Experiences With Prenatal Care Delivery Reported by Black Patients With Low Income and by Health Care Workers in the US: A Qualitative Study.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 10 2022
03 10 2022
Historique:
entrez:
24
10
2022
pubmed:
25
10
2022
medline:
27
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Black pregnant people with low income face inequities in health care access and outcomes in the US, yet their voices have been largely absent from redesigning prenatal care. To examine patients' and health care workers' experiences with prenatal care delivery in a largely low-income Black population to inform care innovations to improve care coordination, access, quality, and outcomes. For this qualitative study, human-centered design-informed interviews were conducted at prenatal care clinics with 19 low-income Black patients who were currently pregnant or up to 1 year post partum and 19 health care workers (eg, physicians, nurses, and community health workers) in Detroit, Michigan, between October 14, 2019, and February 7, 2020. Questions focused on 2 human-centered design phases: observation (understanding problems from the end user's perspective) and ideation (generating novel potential solutions). Questions targeted participants' experiences with the 3 goals of prenatal care: medical care, anticipatory guidance, and social support. An eclectic analytic strategy, including inductive thematic analysis and matrix coding, was used to identify promising strategies for prenatal care redesign. Preferences for prenatal care redesign. Nineteen Black patients (mean [SD] age, 28.4 [5.9] years; 19 [100%] female; and 17 [89.5%] with public insurance) and 17 of 19 health care workers (mean [SD] age, 47.9 [15.7] years; 15 female [88.2%]; and 13 [76.5%] Black) completed the surveys. A range of health care workers were included (eg, physicians, doulas, and social workers). Although all affirmed the 3 prenatal care goals, participants reported failures and potential solutions for each area of prenatal care delivery. Themes also emerged in 2 cross-cutting areas: practitioners and care infrastructure. Participants reported that, ideally, care structure would enable strong ongoing relationships between patients and practitioners. Practitioners would coordinate all prenatal services, not just medical care. Finally, care would be tailored to individual patients by using care navigators, flexible models, and colocation of services to reduce barriers. In this qualitative study of low-income, Black pregnant people in Detroit, Michigan, and the health care workers who care for them, prenatal care delivery failed to meet many patients' needs. Participants reported that an ideal care delivery model would include comprehensive, integrated services across the health care system, expanding beyond medical care to also include patients' social needs and preferences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36279136
pii: 2797594
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38161
pmc: PMC9593232
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2238161Références
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Feb;4(1):79-86
pubmed: 26823064
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1027-1037
pubmed: 32282594
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct 1;138(4):603-615
pubmed: 34352841
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 7;7(4):e013384
pubmed: 28389486
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Apr;26(4):661-669
pubmed: 34982327
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Apr;93(4):458-466
pubmed: 29545005
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):49
pubmed: 32164681
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):835
pubmed: 29258514
Fam Community Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;38(2):149-57
pubmed: 25739062
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Nov 18;5(4):e200
pubmed: 27864167
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
BMJ. 2010 Aug 13;341:c4078
pubmed: 20709715
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):384.e1-384.e11
pubmed: 33039393
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009 May-Jun;54(3):219-25
pubmed: 19410214
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct 1;138(4):593-602
pubmed: 34352810
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):309-324
pubmed: 31502314
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Mar 16;4(1):e8
pubmed: 28302594
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):250.e1-250.e14
pubmed: 28041927
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1038-1046
pubmed: 32282598
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 03;16(6):e147
pubmed: 24892583
Clin Med Insights Womens Health. 2019 Jun 14;12:1179562X19854778
pubmed: 35237092
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):371-382
pubmed: 31977782
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):638.e1-638.e8
pubmed: 31228414
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):552-556
pubmed: 28189608
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1319-1326
pubmed: 29112666