How was the Earth-Moon system formed? New insights from the geodynamo.
Earth–Moon system
geodynamo
giant impact theory
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
entrez:
24
10
2022
pubmed:
25
10
2022
medline:
27
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The most widely accepted scenario for the formation of the Earth-Moon system involves a dramatic impact between the proto-Earth and some other cosmic body. Many features of the present-day Earth-Moon system provide constraints on the nature of this impact. Any model of the history of the Earth must account for the physical, geochemical, petrological, and dynamical evidence. These constraints notwithstanding, there are several radically different impact models that could in principle account for all the evidence. Thus, in the absence of further constraints, we may never know for sure how the Earth-Moon system was formed. Here, we put forward the idea that additional constraints are indeed provided by the fact that the Earth is strongly magnetized. It is universally accepted that the Earth's magnetic field is maintained by a dynamo operating in the outer liquid core. However, because of the rapid rotation of the Earth, this dynamo has the peculiar property that it can maintain a strong field but cannot amplify a weak one. Therefore, the Earth must have been magnetized at a very early epoch, either preimpact or as a result of the impact itself. Either way, any realistic model of the formation of the Earth-Moon system must include magnetic field evolution. This requirement may ultimately constrain the models sufficiently to discriminate between the various candidates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36279439
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120682119
pmc: PMC9636973
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2120682119Références
Science. 1976 Jan 9;191(4222):81-3
pubmed: 17834942
Nature. 2012 Apr 11;485(7398):355-8
pubmed: 22495307
Rep Prog Phys. 2013 Sep;76(9):096801
pubmed: 24004491
Nature. 2011 Nov 09;479(7372):215-8
pubmed: 22071767
Nature. 2006 Jan 12;439(7073):155-60
pubmed: 16407944