Global, regional, and national burden and quality of care index of liver cirrhosis by cause from global burden of disease 1990-2019.
Global Burden of Disease
gender disparity
liver cirrhosis
quality of care index
socioeconomic factors
Journal
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN: 1440-1746
Titre abrégé: J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 8607909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
revised:
21
09
2022
received:
29
06
2022
accepted:
17
10
2022
pubmed:
27
10
2022
medline:
18
1
2023
entrez:
26
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases are complex disorders with a known burden. Currently health systems have different approaches to dealing with this issue. The objective of this study is to describe the burden attributed to and quality of care for cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases. Data of cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases extracted from Global-Burden-of-Diseases 2019. Four indicators, including mortality to incidence ratio, prevalence to incidence ratio, disability-adjusted-life-years (DALYs) to prevalence ratio, and years-of-life-lost (YLLs) to years-lived-with-disability (YLDs) ratio, were defined and combined by the principal-components-analysis to construct the Quality-of-Care-Index (QCI). The global QCI of cirrhosis increased from 71.0 in 1990 to 79.3 in 2019. The QCI showed a favorable situation in higher SDI countries compared with lower SDI countries, with a QCI of 86.8 in high SDI countries and 60.1 in low SDI countries. The highest QCI was found in Western Pacific Region (90.2), and the lowest was for African Region (60.4). Highest QCI belonged to the 50-54 age group (99.5), and the lowest was for the 30.34 age group (70.9). Among underlying causes of cirrhosis, the highest QCI belonged to alcohol use, followed by hepatitis C and NAFLD with QCIs of 86.1, 85.3, and 81.1. There was a considerable variation in the QCI of cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases. Countries with low QCI, mainly located in developing regions, need organized action to control the burden of cirrhosis and its underlying causes and improve their quality of care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases are complex disorders with a known burden. Currently health systems have different approaches to dealing with this issue. The objective of this study is to describe the burden attributed to and quality of care for cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases.
METHODS
METHODS
Data of cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases extracted from Global-Burden-of-Diseases 2019. Four indicators, including mortality to incidence ratio, prevalence to incidence ratio, disability-adjusted-life-years (DALYs) to prevalence ratio, and years-of-life-lost (YLLs) to years-lived-with-disability (YLDs) ratio, were defined and combined by the principal-components-analysis to construct the Quality-of-Care-Index (QCI).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The global QCI of cirrhosis increased from 71.0 in 1990 to 79.3 in 2019. The QCI showed a favorable situation in higher SDI countries compared with lower SDI countries, with a QCI of 86.8 in high SDI countries and 60.1 in low SDI countries. The highest QCI was found in Western Pacific Region (90.2), and the lowest was for African Region (60.4). Highest QCI belonged to the 50-54 age group (99.5), and the lowest was for the 30.34 age group (70.9). Among underlying causes of cirrhosis, the highest QCI belonged to alcohol use, followed by hepatitis C and NAFLD with QCIs of 86.1, 85.3, and 81.1.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There was a considerable variation in the QCI of cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases. Countries with low QCI, mainly located in developing regions, need organized action to control the burden of cirrhosis and its underlying causes and improve their quality of care.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-128Informations de copyright
© 2022 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Nishikawa H, Osaki Y. Liver Cirrhosis: Evaluation, Nutritional Status, and Prognosis. Mediators Inflamm. 2015; 2015: 872152.
Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet (London, England). 2014; 383: 1749-1761.
Schuppan D, Afdhal NH. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet (London, England). 2008; 371: 838-851.
Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J. Hepatol. 2019; 70: 151-171.
Kruk ME, Kelley E, Syed SB, Tarp F, Addison T, Akachi Y. Measuring quality of health-care services: what is known and where are the gaps? Bull. World Health Organ. 2017; 95: 389-A.
Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, McGlynn EA, Campbell S, Brook RH, Roland MO. Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003; 12: 8-12.
Mohammad MA. Healthcare service quality: towards a broad definition. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2013; 26: 203-219.
Jepsen P, Vilstrup H, Andersen PK, Sorensen HT. Socioeconomic status and survival of cirrhosis patients: a Danish nationwide cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009; 9: 35.
Guss D, Sherigar J, Mohanty SR. Missed Diagnosis of Liver Cirrhosis Leads to Disparities in Care for Older Patients. Gastroenterology Res. 2018; 11: 333-339.
Saberifiroozi M. Improving Quality of Care in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis. Middle East J. Dig. Dis. 2017; 9: 189-200.
Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392: 1736-1788.
Network GBoDC. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Cause List Mapped to ICD Codes. Seattle, United States of America: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2020. 2020 [Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2019-cause-icd-code-mappings
Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020; 396: 1204-1222.
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396: 1204-1222.
Mohammadi E, Ghasemi E, Saeedi Moghaddam S et al. Quality of Care Index (QCI). Protocolsio 2020; 2021 (24 Jan 2021).
Keykhaei M, Masinaei M, Mohammadi E et al. A global, regional, and national survey on burden and Quality of Care Index (QCI) of hematologic malignancies; global burden of disease systematic analysis 1990-2017. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2021; 10: 11.
Azadnajafabad S, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Mohammadi E et al. Global, regional, and national burden and quality of care index (QCI) of thyroid cancer: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2017. Cancer Med. 2021; 10: 2496-2508.
Mohammadi E, Ghasemi E, Azadnajafabad S et al. A global, regional, and national survey on burden and Quality of Care Index (QCI) of brain and other central nervous system cancers; global burden of disease systematic analysis 1990-2017. PLoS One. 2021; 16: e0247120.
Aryannejad A, Tabary M, Ebrahimi N et al. Global, regional, and national survey on the burden and quality of care of pancreatic cancer: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 1990-2017. Pancreatology 2021.
Aminorroaya A, Yoosefi M, Rezaei N et al. Global, regional, and national quality of care of ischaemic heart disease from 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2022;29(2):371-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwab066
Ghamari SH, Yoosefi M, Abbasi-Kangevari M et al. Trends in Global, Regional, and National Burden and Quality of Care Index for Liver Cancer by Cause from Global Burden of Disease 1990-2019. Hepatol. Commun. 2022;6(7):1764-1775. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1910
Lee H-L, Peng C-M, Huang C-Y et al. Is mortality-to-incidence ratio associated with health disparity in pancreatic cancer? A cross-sectional database analysis of 57 countries. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e020618.
Ellis L, Belot A, Rachet B, Coleman MP. The Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio Is Not a Valid Proxy for Cancer Survival. J Glob Oncol. 2019; 5: 1-9.
Rencher AC. A review of “Methods of Multivariate Analysis”. Taylor & Francis, 2005.
Network GBoDC. Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017) Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) 1950-2017. United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Seattle, 2018.
Sepanlou SG, Safiri S, Bisignano C et al. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020; 5: 245-266.
Jepsen P, Younossi ZM. The global burden of cirrhosis: A review of disability-adjusted life-years lost and unmet needs. J. Hepatol. 2021; 75: S3-S13.
Murray CJ, Aravkin AY, Zheng P et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020; 396: 1223-1249.
Saver BG, Martin SA, Adler RN et al. Care that Matters: Quality Measurement and Health Care. PLoS Med. 2015; 12: e1001902.
Lazar EJ, Fleischut P, Regan BK. Quality measurement in healthcare. Annu. Rev. Med. 2013; 64: 485-496.
Mokdad AA, Lopez AD, Shahraz S et al. Liver cirrhosis mortality in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. BMC Med. 2014; 12: 145.
Cainelli F. Liver diseases in developing countries. World J. Hepatol. 2012; 4: 66-67.
Wright CM, Boudarène L, Ha NT, Wu O, Hawkins N. A systematic review of hepatitis B screening economic evaluations in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health 2018; 18: 373.
Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Valla D-C, Roudot-Thoraval F. The burden of liver disease in Europe: A review of available epidemiological data. J. Hepatol. 2013; 58: 593-608.
Kew MC. Progress towards the comprehensive control of hepatitis B in Africa: a view from South Africa. Gut 1996; 38: S31-S36.
Becker G, Newsom E. Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction with health care among chronically ill African Americans. Am. J. Public Health 2003; 93: 742-748.
Vaz J, Strömberg U, Eriksson B, Buchebner D, Midlöv P. Socioeconomic and marital status among liver cirrhosis patients and associations with mortality: a population-based cohort study in Sweden. BMC Public Health 2020; 20: 1820.
Wright C, Boudarene L, Ha N, Wu O, Hawkins N. A systematic review of hepatitis B screening economic evaluations in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health 2018; 18: 373.
Pazokian M, Esmaeili M. Quality of Life in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review. Hospital Pract. Res. 2019; 4: 111-116.
Di Pascoli M, Ceranto E, De Nardi P et al. Hospitalizations Due to Cirrhosis: Clinical Aspects in a Large Cohort of Italian Patients and Cost Analysis Report. Dig. Dis. 2017; 35: 433-438.
Neff GW, Duncan CW, Schiff ER. The current economic burden of cirrhosis. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011; 7: 661-671.
Neff GW, Kemmer N, Duncan C, Alsina A. Update on the management of cirrhosis - focus on cost-effective preventative strategies. Clinico Econ. Outcomes Res. CEOR. 2013; 5: 143-152.
Hirode G, Saab S, Wong RJ. Trends in the Burden of Chronic Liver Disease Among Hospitalized US Adults. JAMA Netw. Open 2020; 3: e201997.
Setoyama H, Tanaka Y, Kanto T. Seamless support from screening to anti-HCV treatment and HCC/decompensated cirrhosis: Subsidy programs for HCV elimination. Global Health Med 2021; 3: 335, 2021.01079-342.
Oza N, Isoda H, Ono T, Kanto T. Current activities and future directions of comprehensive hepatitis control measures in Japan: The supportive role of the Hepatitis Information Center in building a solid foundation. Hepatol. Res. 2017; 47: 487-496.
Enomoto H, Ueno Y, Hiasa Y et al. Transition in the etiology of liver cirrhosis in Japan: a nationwide survey. J. Gastroenterol. 2020; 55: 353-362.
Allen A, Hay J. The management of cirrhosis in women. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014; 40: 1146-1154.
Guy J, Peters MG. Liver disease in women: the influence of gender on epidemiology, natural history, and patient outcomes. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013; 9: 633-639.
Wu EM, Wong LL, Hernandez BY et al. Gender differences in hepatocellular cancer: disparities in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis and liver transplantation. Hepatoma Research. 2018; 4: 66.
Chen C-Y, Wu C-J, Pan C-F, Chen H-H, Chen Y-W. Influence of age on critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Int. J. Gerontol. 2015; 9: 233-238.
Kamimura K, Sakamaki A, Kamimura H et al. Considerations of elderly factors to manage the complication of liver cirrhosis in elderly patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019; 25: 1817-1827.