Reinforcing nature-based solutions through tools providing social-ecological-technological integration.
Climate change adaptation
Functional diversity
Nature-based solutions (NbS)
Remote sensing
Resilience
Social-ecological-technological systems (SETS)
Journal
Ambio
ISSN: 1654-7209
Titre abrégé: Ambio
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 0364220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
25
02
2022
accepted:
04
10
2022
revised:
09
07
2022
pubmed:
27
10
2022
medline:
21
1
2023
entrez:
26
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While held to be a means for climate change adaptation and mitigation, nature-based solutions (NbS) themselves are vulnerable to climate change. To find ways of compensating for this vulnerability we combine a focused literature review on how information technology has been used to strengthen positive social-ecological-technological feedback, with the development of a prototype decision-support tool. Guided by the literature review, the tool integrates recent advances in using globally available remote sensing data to elicit information on functional diversity and ecosystem service provisioning with information on human service demand and population vulnerability. When combined, these variables can inform climate change adaptation strategies grounded in local social-ecological realities. This type of integrated monitoring and packaging information to be actionable have potential to support NbS management and local knowledge building for context-tailored solutions to societal challenges in urban environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36287383
doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01801-4
pii: 10.1007/s13280-022-01801-4
pmc: PMC9849649
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
489-507Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
ID : 821242
Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
ID : No730222-2
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : FKZ 01LE1910A/01LE1910A1
Organisme : NordForsk
ID : 95377
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Afzalan, N., and B. Muller. 2014. The role of social media in green infrastructure planning: A case study of neighborhood participation in park siting. Journal of Urban Technology 21: 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.940701 .
doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.940701
Afzalan, N., and B. Muller. 2018. Online participatory technologies: Opportunities and challenges for enriching participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 84: 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1434010 .
doi: 10.1080/01944363.2018.1434010
Almenar, J.B., T. Elliot, B. Rugani, B. Philippe, T.N. Gutierrez, G. Sonnemann, and D. Geneletti. 2021. Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges. Land Use Policy 100: 104898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898
Andersson, E., S. Barthel, S. Borgström, J. Colding, T. Elmqvist, C. Folke, and Å. Gren. 2014. Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio 43: 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y .
doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
Andersson, E., S. Borgström, and T. McPhearson. 2017. Double insurance in dealing with extremes: Ecological and social factors for making nature-based solutions last. In Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas, ed. N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, and A. Bonn, 51–64. Cham: Springer.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_4
Andersson, E., J. Langemeyer, S. Borgström, T. McPhearson, D. Haase, J. Kronenberg, D.N. Barton, M. Davis, et al. 2019. Enabling green and blue infrastructure to improve contributions to human well-being and equity in urban systems. BioScience 69: 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz058 .
doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz058
Andersson, E., D. Haase, S. Scheuer, and T. Wellmann. 2020. Neighbourhood character affects the spatial extent and magnitude of the functional footprint of urban green infrastructure. Landscape Ecology 35: 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01039-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01039-z
Andersson, E., D. Haase, P. Andersson, C. Cortinovis, J. Goodness, D. Kendal, A. Lausch, T. McPhearson, et al. 2021. What are the traits of a social-ecological system? Towards a framework in support of urban sustainability. Npj Urban Sustainability 1: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-020-00008-4 .
doi: 10.1038/s42949-020-00008-4
Bellamy, C., A. van der Jagt, S. Barbour, M. Smith, and D. Moseley. 2017. A spatial framework for targeting urban planning for pollinators and people with local stakeholders: A route to healthy, blossoming communities? Environmental Research 158: 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023
de Bello, F., S. Lavorel, L. Hallett, E. Valencia, E. Garnier, C. Roscher, L. Conti, T. Galland, et al. 2021. Functional trait effects on ecosystem stability: Assembling the jigsaw puzzle. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 36: 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.05.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.05.001
Boegh, E., H. Soegaard, N. Broge, C.B. Hasager, N.O. Jensen, K. Schelde, and A. Thomsen. 2002. Airborne multispectral data for quantifying leaf area index, nitrogen concentration, and photosynthetic efficiency in agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment 81: 179–193.
doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00342-X
Brink, E., T. Aalders, D. Ádám, R. Feller, Y. Henselek, A. Hoffmann, K. Ibe, A. Matthey-Doret, et al. 2016. Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Global Environmental Change 36: 111–123.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003
Buurman, J., M.J.P. Mens, and R.J. Dahm. 2017. Strategies for urban drought risk management: A comparison of 10 large cities. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33: 31–50.
doi: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1138398
Chrysoulakis, N., G. Somarakis, S. Stagakis, Z. Mitraka, and M. Wong. 2021. Monitoring and evaluating nature-based solutions implementation in urban areas by means of earth observation. Remote Sensing 13: 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081503 .
doi: 10.3390/rs13081503
Cohen-Shacham, E., G. Walters, C. Janzen, and S. Maginnis. 2016. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN: Gland. Switzerland 97: 2016–2036.
Croeser, T., G. E. Garrard, F. M. Thomas, T. D. Tran, I. Mell, S. Clement, R. Sánchez, and S. Bekessy. 2021. Diagnosing delivery capabilities on a large international nature-based solutions project. npj Urban Sustainability 1: 1–9.
Deutscher Wetterdienst. 2022. Climate data Germany (Klimadaten Deutschland). www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/klimadatendeutschland/klimadatendeutschland.html . Accessed 10 Aug 2022.
Dhakal, K.P., and L.R. Chevalier. 2016. Urban stormwater governance: The need for a paradigm shift. Environmental Management 57: 1112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0667-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0667-5
Díaz, S., and M. Cabido. 2001. Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2 .
doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2
Dodman, D. M., B. Hayward, M. Pelling, V. Castan Broto, W. Chow, E. Chu, R. Dawson, L. Khirfan, et al. 2022. Cities, settlements and key infrastructure. In Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, ed. H. Pörtner, D. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegria, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, et al., 907–1040. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Dumitru, A., and L. Wendling. 2021. Evaluating the impact of nature-based solutions: A handbook for practitioners. Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/244577 .
doi: 10.2777/244577
Dumitru, A., N. Frantzeskaki, and M. Collier. 2020. Identifying principles for the design of robust impact evaluation frameworks for nature-based solutions in cities. Environmental Science and Policy 112: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.024 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.024
Egerer, M., D. Haase, T. McPhearson, N. Frantzeskaki, E. Andersson, H. Nagendra, and A. Ossola. 2021. Urban change as an untapped opportunity for climate adaptation. npj Urban Sustainability 1: 1–9.
Elmqvist, T., J. Siri, E. Andersson, P. Anderson, X. Bai, P.K. Das, T. Gatere, A. Gonzalez, et al. 2018. Urban tinkering. Sustainability Science 13: 1549–1564.
doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0611-0
Endreny, T.A. 2018. Strategically growing the urban forest will improve our world. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03622-0 .
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03622-0
Fastenrath, S., J. Bush, and L. Coenen. 2020. Scaling-up nature-based solutions. Lessons from the Living Melbourne strategy. Geoforum 116: 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.011 .
doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.011
Finewood, M.H., A.M. Matsler, and J. Zivkovich. 2019. Green infrastructure and the hidden politics of urban stormwater governance in a postindustrial city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109: 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813 .
doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813
Fu, X., H. Goddard, X. Wang, and M.E. Hopton. 2019. Development of a scenario-based stormwater management planning support system for reducing combined sewer overflows (CSOs). Journal of Environmental Management 236: 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.089 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.089
Grêt-Regamey, A., M. Switalski, N. Fagerholm, S. Korpilo, S. Juhola, M. Kyttä, N. Käyhkö, T. McPhearson, et al. 2021. Harnessing sensing systems towards urban sustainability transformation. npj Urban Sustainability 1: 1–9.
Gulsrud, N.M., C.M. Raymond, R.L. Rutt, A.S. Olafsson, T. Plieninger, M. Sandberg, T.H. Beery, and K.I. Jönsson. 2018. ‘Rage against the machine’? The opportunities and risks concerning the automation of urban green infrastructure. Landscape and Urban Planning 180: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.012
Haase, D., and R. Hellwig. 2022. Trees, forests and people effects of heat and drought stress on the health status of six urban street tree species in Leipzig, Germany. Trees, Forests and People 8: 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100252 .
doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100252
Haralick, R., K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3: 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 .
doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
Hasala, D., S. Supak, and L. Rivers. 2020. Green infrastructure site selection in the Walnut Creek wetland community: A case study from southeast Raleigh, North Carolina. Landscape and Urban Planning 196: 103743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103743 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103743
Homolová, L., Z. Malenovský, J. Clevers, G. García-Santos, and M. Schaepman. 2013. Review of optical-based remote sensing for plant trait mapping. Ecological Complexity 15: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.06.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.06.003
Kabisch, N., N. Frantzeskaki, S. Pauleit, S. Naumann, M. Davis, M. Artmann, D. Haase, S. Knapp, et al. 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society 21: 39.
doi: 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
Kabisch, N., N. Frantzeskaki, and R. Hansen. 2022. Principles for urban nature-based solutions. Ambio 51: 1388–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w .
doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w
Kahila-Tani, M., A. Broberg, M. Kyttä, and T. Tyger. 2016. Let the citizens map—public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process. Planning Practice & Research 31: 195–214.
doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203
Kattge, J., G. Bönisch, S. Diaz, S. Lavorel, I.C. Prentice, P. Leadley, S. Tautenhahn, G.D.A. Werner, et al. 2020. TRY plant trait database–enhanced coverage and open access. Global Change Biology 26: 119–188.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14904
Konijnendijk, C.C., R.M. Ricard, A. Kenney, and T.B. Randrup. 2006. Defining urban forestry–A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4: 93–103.
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.11.003
Kumar, P., S.E. Debele, J. Sahani, N. Rawat, B. Marti-cardona, S. Maria, B. Basu, A. Sarkar, et al. 2021. An overview of monitoring methods for assessing the performance of nature-based solutions against natural hazards. Earth-Science Reviews 217: 103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103603 .
doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103603
Lausch, A., O. Bastian, F. Herzog, P. Leitão, D. Rocchini, L. Tischendorf, B. Olaf, K. Stefan, et al. 2018. Understanding and assessing vegetation health by in-situ species and remote sensing approaches. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 1799–1809. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13025 .
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13025
Leonard, L., B. Miles, B. Heidari, L. Lin, A.M. Castronova, B. Minsker, J. Lee, C. Scaife, et al. 2019. Development of a participatory Green Infrastructure design, visualization and evaluation system in a cloud supported jupyter notebook computing environment. Environmental Modelling and Software 111: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.003
Li, J., and J.I. Nassauer. 2021. Technology in support of nature-based solutions requires understanding everyday experiences. Ecology and Society 26: 35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12838-260435 .
doi: 10.5751/ES-12838-260435
Lin, B.B., A. Ossola, M. Alberti, E. Andersson, X. Bai, C. Dobbs, T. Elmqvist, K.L. Evans, et al. 2021. Integrating solutions to adapt cities for climate change. The Lancet Planetary Health 5: e479–e486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00135-2 .
doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00135-2
Lloret, F., A. Lobo, H. Estevan, P. Maisongrande, J. Vayreda, and J. Terradas. 2007. Woody plant richness and NDVI response to drought events in Catalonian (Northeastern Spain) forests. Ecology 88: 2270–2279.
doi: 10.1890/06-1195.1
Marselle, M.R., D.E. Bowler, J. Watzema, D. Eichenberg, T. Kirsten, and A. Bonn. 2020. Urban street tree biodiversity and antidepressant prescriptions. Scientific Reports 10: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79924-5 .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79924-5
McPhearson, T., E.M. Cook, M. Berbés-Blázquez, C. Cheng, N.B. Grimm, E. Andersson, O. Barbosa, D.G. Chandler, et al. 2022. A social-ecological-technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services. One Earth 5: 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.007
Meerow, S., J.P. Newell, and M. Stults. 2016. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 147: 38–49.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Møller, M.S., and A.S. Olafsson. 2018. The use of e-tools to engage citizens in urban green infrastructure governance: Where do we stand and where are we going? Sustainability 10: 3513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103513 .
doi: 10.3390/su10103513
Møller, M.S., A.S. Olafsson, K. Vierikko, K. Sehested, B. Elands, A. Buijs, and C.K. van den Bosch. 2019. Participation through place-based e-tools: A valuable resource for urban green infrastructure governance? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 40: 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.003
Nash, C., J. Clough, D. Gedge, R. Lindsay, D. Newport, M.A. Ciupala, and S. Connop. 2016. Initial insights on the biodiversity potential of biosolar roofs: A London Olympic Park green roof case study. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 62: 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15659801.2015.1045791 .
doi: 10.1080/15659801.2015.1045791
Nayak, S.G., S. Shrestha, P.L. Kinney, Z. Ross, S.C. Sheridan, C.I. Pantea, W.H. Hsu, N. Muscatiello, et al. 2018. Development of a heat vulnerability index for New York State. Public Health 161: 127–137.
doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.09.006
Nesshöver, C., T. Assmuth, K.N. Irvine, G.M. Rusch, K.A. Waylen, B. Delbaere, D. Haase, L. Jones-Walters, et al. 2017. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the Total Environment 579: 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
Newton, P., and N. Frantzeskaki. 2021. Creating a national urban research and development platform for advancing urban experimentation. Sustainability (switzerland) 13: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020530 .
doi: 10.3390/su13020530
Nock, C.A., A. Paquette, M. Follett, D.J. Nowak, and C. Messier. 2013. Effects of urbanization on tree species functional diversity in Eastern North America. Ecosystems 16: 1487–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9697-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s10021-013-9697-5
O’Donnell, E.C., J.E. Lamond, and C.R. Thorne. 2018. Learning and Action Alliance framework to facilitate stakeholder collaboration and social learning in urban flood risk management. Environmental Science and Policy 80: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.013 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.013
Olazabal, M., E. Chu, V.C. Broto, and J. Patterson. 2021. Subaltern forms of knowledge are required to boost local adaptation. One Earth 4: 828–838.
doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.006
Othengrafen, F., and M. Levin-Keitel. 2019. Planners between the chairs: How planners (do not) adapt to transformative practices. Urban Planning 4: 111–125. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i4.2237 .
doi: 10.17645/up.v4i4.2237
Palliwoda, J., and J.A. Priess. 2021. What do people value in urban green? Linking characteristics of urban green spaces to users’ perceptions of nature benefits, disturbances, and disservices. Ecology and Society 26: 28. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12204-260128 .
doi: 10.5751/ES-12204-260128
Palliwoda, J., E. Banzhaf, and J.A. Priess. 2020. How do the green components of urban green infrastructure influence the use of ecosystem services? Examples from Leipzig, Germany. Landscape Ecology 35: 1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01004-w .
doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01004-w
Pan, H., J. Page, C. Cong, S. Barthel, and Z. Kalantari. 2021. How ecosystems services drive urban growth: Integrating nature-based solutions. Antropocene 35: 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2021.100297 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2021.100297
Pan, H., Y. Kwak, and B. Deal. 2022. Participatory development of planning support systems to improve empowerment and localization. Journal of Urban Technology 29: 33–54.
doi: 10.1080/10630732.2022.2031431
Paquette, A., R. Sousa-Silva, F. Maure, E. Cameron, M. Belluau, and C. Messier. 2021. Praise for diversity: A functional approach to reduce risks in urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 62: 127157.
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127157
Partelow, S., and K.J. Winkler. 2016. Interlinking ecosystem services and Ostrom’s framework through orientation in sustainability research. Ecology and Society 21: 27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08524-210327 .
doi: 10.5751/ES-08524-210327
Pineda-Pinto, M., N. Frantzeskaki, and C.A. Nygaard. 2021. The potential of nature-based solutions to deliver ecologically just cities: Lessons for research and urban planning from a systematic literature review. Ambio 51: 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7
Planet Labs. 2022. Planet Imagery Product Specifications. www.assets.planet.com/docs/Planet_Combined_Imagery_Product_Specs_letter_screen.pdf Accessed 05 June 2022
Plitt, S., M. Johnson, and E. Andersson. 2022. Assessing the potential of E-tools for knowledge sharing and stewardship of urban green infrastructure. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 48: 124–137. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2022.010 .
doi: 10.48044/jauf.2022.010
Rink, D., and C. Schmidt. 2021. Afforestation of urban brownfields as a nature-based solution. Experiences from a project in Leipzig (Germany). Land 10: 893.
Scheuer, S., D. Haase, A. Haase, M. Wolff, and T. Wellmann. 2021. A glimpse into the future of exposure and vulnerabilities in cities? Modelling of residential location choice of urban population with random forest. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 21: 203–217. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-203-2021 .
doi: 10.5194/nhess-21-203-2021
Schneider, F., F. Morsdorf, B. Schmid, O. Petchey, A. Hueni, D. Schimel, and M. Schaepman. 2017. Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits. Nature Communications 8: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01530-3 .
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01530-3
Schönfeld, P. 2019. “Climate trees”—which species can be planted in the future? (In German). LWG aktuell: 1–9.
Shahtahmassebi, A.R., C. Li, Y. Fan, Y. Wu, M. Gan, K. Wang, A. Malik, G.A. Blackburn, et al. 2021. Remote sensing of urban green spaces: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 57: 126946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126946 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126946
Sjöman, H., A.D. Hirons, and N.L. Bassuk. 2018. Improving confidence in tree species selection for challenging urban sites: A role for leaf turgor loss. Urban Ecosystems 21: 1171–1188.
doi: 10.1007/s11252-018-0791-5
Somarakis, G., S. Stagakis, and N. Chrysoulakis, ed. 2019. ThinkNature Nature-Based Solutions Handbook. ThinkNature project funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 730338. https://doi.org/10.26225/jerv-w202 .
Stadt Leipzig. Open Data Leipzig, Available at: www.opendata.leipzig.de . 10-Sept-2021.
Taylor, J.R., M. Hanumappa, L. Miller, B. Shane, and M.L. Richardson. 2021. Facilitating multifunctional green infrastructure planning in washington, dc through a tableau interface. Sustainability 13: 8390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158390 .
doi: 10.3390/su13158390
Tengö, M., R. Hill, P. Malmer, C.M. Raymond, M. Spierenburg, F. Danielsen, T. Elmqvist, and C. Folke. 2017. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26: 17–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005
Toxopeus, H., P. Kotsila, M. Conde, A. Katona, A.P.N. van der Jagt, and F. Polzin. 2020. How ‘just’ is hybrid governance of urban nature-based solutions? Cities 105: 102839.
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102839
Tzoulas, K., J. Galan, S. Venn, M. Dennis, B. Pedroli, H. Mishra, D. Haase, S. Pauleit, et al. 2021. A conceptual model of the social–ecological system of nature-based solutions in urban environments. Ambio 50: 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01380-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01380-2
Ugolini, F., L. Massetti, G. Sanesi, and D. Pearlmutter. 2015. Knowledge transfer between stakeholders in the field of urban forestry and green infrastructure: Results of a European survey. Land Use Policy 49: 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.019
Venter, Z.S., D.N. Barton, L. Martinez-Izquierdo, J. Langemeyer, F. Baró, and T. McPhearson. 2021. Interactive spatial planning of urban green infrastructure—Retrofitting green roofs where ecosystem services are most needed in Oslo. Ecosystem Services 50: 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101314 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101314
Violle, C., M. Navas, D. Vile, E. Kazakou, C. Fortunel, I. Hummel, and E. Garnier. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116: 882–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15559.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15559.x
Wang, L., J.J. Qu, X. Hao, and E.R. Hunt Jr. 2011. Estimating dry matter content from spectral reflectance for green leaves of different species. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32: 7097–7109.
doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.494641
Wang, Q., S. Adiku, J. Tenhunen, and A. Granier. 2005. On the relationship of NDVI with leaf area index in a deciduous forest site. Remote Sensing of Environment 94: 244–255.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.006
Watkins, H., A. Hirons, H. Sjöman, R. Cameron, and J.D. Hitchmough. 2021. Can trait-based schemes be used to select species in urban forestry? Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 3: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.654618 .
doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.654618
Weise, H., H. Auge, C. Baessler, I. Bärlund, E.M. Bennett, U. Berger, F. Bohn, A. Bonn, et al. 2020. Resilience trinity: Safeguarding ecosystem functioning and services across three different time horizons and decision contexts. Oikos 129: 445–456.
doi: 10.1111/oik.07213
Wellmann, T., D. Haase, S. Knapp, C. Salbach, P. Selsam, and A. Lausch. 2018. Urban land use intensity assessment: The potential of spatio-temporal spectral traits with remote sensing. Ecological Indicators 85: 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.029 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.029
Wellmann, T., A. Lausch, E. Andersson, S. Knapp, C. Cortinovis, J. Jache, S. Scheuer, P. Kremer, et al. 2020. Remote sensing in urban planning: Contributions towards ecologically sound policies? Landscape and Urban Planning 204: 103921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103921 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103921
Werners, S.E., R.M. Wise, J.R.A. Butler, E. Totin, and K. Vincent. 2021. Adaptation pathways: A review of approaches and a learning framework. Environmental Science and Policy 116: 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.003
Wickenberg, B., K. McCormick, and J.A. Olsson. 2021. Advancing the implementation of nature-based solutions in cities: A review of frameworks. Environmental Science and Policy 125: 44–53.
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.016
Xie, C., J. Wang, D. Haase, T. Wellmann, and A. Lausch. 2023. Measuring spatio-temporal heterogeneity and interior characteristics of green spaces in urban neighborhoods: A new approach using gray level co-occurrence matrix. Science of the Total Environment 855: 158608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158608 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158608
Yang, J., P. Yin, J. Sun, B. Wang, M. Zhou, M. Li, S. Tong, B. Meng, et al. 2019. Heatwave and mortality in 31 major Chinese cities: Definition, vulnerability and implications. Science of the Total Environment 649: 695–702.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.332
Zhang, Y., M. Migliavacca, J. Penuelas, and W. Ju. 2021. Advances in hyperspectral remote sensing of vegetation traits and functions. Remote Sensing of Environment 252: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112121 .
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112121
Zheng, Z., Y. Zeng, F.D. Schneider, Y. Zhao, D. Zhao, B. Schmid, M.E. Schaepman, and F. Morsdorf. 2020. Mapping functional diversity using individual tree-based morphological and physiological traits in a subtropical forest. Remote Sensing of Environment 252: 112170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112170 .
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112170
Zhu, Z., Y. Zhou, K.C. Seto, E.C. Stokes, C. Deng, S.T.A. Pickett, and H. Taubenböck. 2019. Understanding an urbanizing planet: Strategic directions for remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 228: 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.020 .
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.020
Zingraff-Hamed, A., F. Hüesker, C. Albert, M. Brillinger, J. Huang, G. Lupp, S. Scheuer, M. Schlätel, et al. 2021. Governance models for nature-based solutions: Seventeen cases from Germany. Ambio 50: 1610–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01412-x
doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01412-x