Sustainable elk harvests in Alberta with increasing predator populations.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 17 05 2022
accepted: 13 09 2022
entrez: 26 10 2022
pubmed: 27 10 2022
medline: 29 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Large predators often are believed to cause declines in hunter harvests of ungulates due to direct competition for prey with hunters. In Alberta, predators of elk (Cervus elaphus), including grizzly bear (Ursus arctos), cougar (Puma concolor), and wolf (Canis lupus), have increased in recent years. We used trend analysis replicated by Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) to examine regional trends in elk harvest and hunter success. Over a 26-yr period, average harvest of elk increased by 5.46% per year for unrestricted bull and by 6.64% per year for limited-quota seasons. Also, over the same time frame, average hunter success increased by 0.2% per year for unrestricted bull and by 0.3% per year for limited-quota seasons, but no trend was detected in hunter effort (P>0.05). Our results show that increasing large-predator populations do not necessarily reduce hunter harvest of elk, and we only found evidence for this in Alberta's mountain WMUs where predation on elk calves has reduced recruitment. Furthermore, data indicate that Alberta's elk harvest management has been sustainable, i.e., hunting has continued while populations of elk have increased throughout most of the province. Wildlife agencies can justify commitments to long-term population monitoring because data allow adaptive management and can inform stakeholders on the status of populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36288266
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269407
pii: PONE-D-22-14168
pmc: PMC9604012
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0269407

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Environ Manage. 2009 Jan;90(1):222-35
pubmed: 18082311
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Dec;21(12):668-73
pubmed: 16919361
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 26;8(1):5204
pubmed: 29581471
Environ Manage. 2018 May;61(5):719-731
pubmed: 29318357
Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Dec;82(4):340-7
pubmed: 23316496
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Nov;80(6):1246-57
pubmed: 21615401
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 22;11(9):e0162989
pubmed: 27657496
J Anim Ecol. 2016 May;85(3):785-97
pubmed: 26790111
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Oct;25(10):547-50
pubmed: 20727614
Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 03;4(10):eaat8281
pubmed: 30306133

Auteurs

Tyler Trump (T)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Kyle Knopff (K)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Golder Associates, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Andrea Morehouse (A)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Winisk Research and Consulting, Pincher Creek, Alberta, Canada.

Mark S Boyce (MS)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH