A Narrative Review on Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tools for the Analysis of Dental Arches in Orofacial Cleft Patients.
cleft lip
cleft palate
dental arches
diagnosis
imaging
three-dimensional
Journal
Children (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9067
Titre abrégé: Children (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648936
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Oct 2022
07 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
19
08
2022
revised:
27
09
2022
accepted:
01
10
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is necessary to analyze and monitor the facial growth of orofacial cleft patients. The documentation should therefore begin before and after primary surgeries. Technological evolution has transformed plaster models into 3D images through scanners that allow rational storage, manipulation, and rotation without the possibility of breakage or damage. Based on this fact, this narrative review aims to provide a feature on the three-dimensional tools available for the assessment of dental arches in children with orofacial cleft and mixed dentition. Three databases were chosen (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) and keywords were used to select papers. During the database screening, 292 potentially relevant papers were found. After removing duplicates, titles, and abstracts, 32 papers presented qualifications for analysis. Through evaluating each document by reading it one by one, 24 papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria. It was concluded that digital tools-i.e., benchtop scanners which evaluate the dental arches of children with cleft lip, palate, and mixed dentition-are reproducible and reliable, without the use of ionizing radiation, allow storage, manipulation with sustainability, and help preserve the environment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It is necessary to analyze and monitor the facial growth of orofacial cleft patients. The documentation should therefore begin before and after primary surgeries. Technological evolution has transformed plaster models into 3D images through scanners that allow rational storage, manipulation, and rotation without the possibility of breakage or damage. Based on this fact, this narrative review aims to provide a feature on the three-dimensional tools available for the assessment of dental arches in children with orofacial cleft and mixed dentition.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
Three databases were chosen (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) and keywords were used to select papers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
During the database screening, 292 potentially relevant papers were found. After removing duplicates, titles, and abstracts, 32 papers presented qualifications for analysis. Through evaluating each document by reading it one by one, 24 papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
It was concluded that digital tools-i.e., benchtop scanners which evaluate the dental arches of children with cleft lip, palate, and mixed dentition-are reproducible and reliable, without the use of ionizing radiation, allow storage, manipulation with sustainability, and help preserve the environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36291469
pii: children9101533
doi: 10.3390/children9101533
pmc: PMC9600360
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Nov 30;39(6):641-645
pubmed: 28371800
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Sep;31(5):606-612
pubmed: 32970887
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1041-1050
pubmed: 29943366
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 30;8:e9631
pubmed: 32821547
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2018;59(3):183-191
pubmed: 30224612
Arch Oral Biol. 2006 Mar;51(3):222-35
pubmed: 16139239
Cureus. 2022 Mar 11;14(3):e23067
pubmed: 35308184
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):768-72
pubmed: 21828358
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 May 1;32(3):964-966
pubmed: 33405460
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jun 05;31:e46
pubmed: 28591242
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;44(9):1117-22
pubmed: 27460947
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jul;28(5):e449-e451
pubmed: 28570403
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Jul;49(4):477-83
pubmed: 21417780
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jun;20(5):943-50
pubmed: 26462656
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;33(2):e143-e145
pubmed: 34636766
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;38(3):155-9
pubmed: 19447636
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1511-1514
pubmed: 30029840
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Jan 01;15(1):46-55
pubmed: 24939264
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 Jan;53(1):16-21
pubmed: 25794014
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Dec;126(6):463-468
pubmed: 30249537
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Sep-Oct;21(5):437-42
pubmed: 24212990
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Apr;56(4):495-501
pubmed: 29870280
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;109:1-6
pubmed: 29728158
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Sep;29(6):1657-1660
pubmed: 30028406
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Aug;38(4):341-4
pubmed: 26283326
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep;31(6):e534-e538
pubmed: 32371703
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Oct;5(4):319-331
pubmed: 31860800
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;48(2):141-147
pubmed: 31917062
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1975-1983
pubmed: 34665341
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Sep;68(9):2129-35
pubmed: 20646812
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Mar;50(2):182-6
pubmed: 22420605
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004 Nov;41(6):646-50
pubmed: 15516169
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Jul;44(4):434-43
pubmed: 17608548
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(8):2456-2458
pubmed: 31369497
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 Sep;53(5):578-83
pubmed: 26406557
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 May;60(4):437-442
pubmed: 35351327
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Sep;49(5):530-4
pubmed: 21214319