Long-Term Prognosis Value of Paravalvular Leak and Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Insight from the France-TAVI Registry.

TAVI mismatch paravalvular leak

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 02 09 2022
revised: 07 10 2022
accepted: 11 10 2022
entrez: 27 10 2022
pubmed: 28 10 2022
medline: 28 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) in a majority of patients across all surgical risks. Paravalvular leak (PVL) and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) are two frequent complications of TAVI. Therefore, based on the large France-TAVI registry, we planned to report the incidence of both complications following TAVI, evaluate their respective risk factors, and study their respective impacts on long-term clinical outcomes, including mortality. We identified 47,494 patients in the database who underwent a TAVI in France between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Within this population, 17,742 patients had information regarding PPM status (5138 with moderate-to-severe PPM, 29.0%) and 20,878 had information regarding PVL (4056 with PVL ≥ 2, 19.4%). After adjustment, the risk factors for PVL ≥ 2 were a lower body mass index (BMI), a high baseline mean aortic gradient, a higher body surface area, a lower ejection fraction, a smaller diameter of TAVI, and a self-expandable TAVI device, while for moderate-to-severe PPM we identified a younger age, a lower BMI, a larger body surface area, a low aortic annulus area, a low ejection fraction, and a smaller diameter TAVI device (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86) as predictors. At 6.5 years, PVL ≥ 2 was an independent predictor of mortality and was associated with higher mortality risk. PPM was not associated with increased risk of mortality. Our analysis from the France-TAVI registry showed that both moderate-to-severe PPM and PVL ≥ 2 continue to be frequently observed after the TAVI procedure. Different risk factors, mostly related to the patient's anatomy and TAVI device selection, for both complications have been identified. Only PVL ≥ 2 was associated with higher mortality during follow-up.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) in a majority of patients across all surgical risks.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
Paravalvular leak (PVL) and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) are two frequent complications of TAVI. Therefore, based on the large France-TAVI registry, we planned to report the incidence of both complications following TAVI, evaluate their respective risk factors, and study their respective impacts on long-term clinical outcomes, including mortality.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 47,494 patients in the database who underwent a TAVI in France between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Within this population, 17,742 patients had information regarding PPM status (5138 with moderate-to-severe PPM, 29.0%) and 20,878 had information regarding PVL (4056 with PVL ≥ 2, 19.4%). After adjustment, the risk factors for PVL ≥ 2 were a lower body mass index (BMI), a high baseline mean aortic gradient, a higher body surface area, a lower ejection fraction, a smaller diameter of TAVI, and a self-expandable TAVI device, while for moderate-to-severe PPM we identified a younger age, a lower BMI, a larger body surface area, a low aortic annulus area, a low ejection fraction, and a smaller diameter TAVI device (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86) as predictors. At 6.5 years, PVL ≥ 2 was an independent predictor of mortality and was associated with higher mortality risk. PPM was not associated with increased risk of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our analysis from the France-TAVI registry showed that both moderate-to-severe PPM and PVL ≥ 2 continue to be frequently observed after the TAVI procedure. Different risk factors, mostly related to the patient's anatomy and TAVI device selection, for both complications have been identified. Only PVL ≥ 2 was associated with higher mortality during follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36294438
pii: jcm11206117
doi: 10.3390/jcm11206117
pmc: PMC9604905
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20
pubmed: 27040324
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705
pubmed: 30883058
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;77(9):1149-1161
pubmed: 33663731
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1466-1477
pubmed: 34238557
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746
pubmed: 33888385
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Feb 1;19(2):225-233
pubmed: 28329317
JAMA. 2014 Apr 16;311(15):1503-14
pubmed: 24682026
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715
pubmed: 30883053
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 15;119(4):618-622
pubmed: 28010874
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;17(6):589-90
pubmed: 27143783
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2492-2516
pubmed: 33213729
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 20;76(16):1830-1843
pubmed: 33059828
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 3;366(18):1705-15
pubmed: 22551129
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Aug - Sep;113(8-9):534-541
pubmed: 32712203
Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):260-268
pubmed: 31736332
Circulation. 1978 Jul;58(1):20-4
pubmed: 348341
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 4;72(22):2701-2711
pubmed: 30257798
Circulation. 2014 Apr 1;129(13):1415-27
pubmed: 24566199
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):882-896
pubmed: 35241222
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632
pubmed: 34453165
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Sep;22(9):975-1014; quiz 1082-4
pubmed: 19733789
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 4;70(1):42-55
pubmed: 28662806
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2173-2182
pubmed: 31564593
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 11;68(15):1637-1647
pubmed: 27712776
Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):243-259
pubmed: 31736356
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 10;14(9):964-976
pubmed: 33958170

Auteurs

Pierre Deharo (P)

Département de Cardiologie, CHU Timone, 13385 Marseille, France.
INSERM, Inra, C2VN, Aix Marseille La Timone University, 13005 Marseille, France.
Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France.

Lionel Leroux (L)

Département de Cardiologie, CHU Bordeaux, 33075 Bordeaux, France.

Alexis Theron (A)

Département de Chirurgie Cardiaque, CHU Timone, 13005 Marseille, France.

Jérome Ferrara (J)

Département de Cardiologie, CHU Timone, 13385 Marseille, France.

Antoine Vaillier (A)

Département de Cardiologie, CHU Timone, 13385 Marseille, France.

Nicolas Jaussaud (N)

Département de Chirurgie Cardiaque, CHU Timone, 13005 Marseille, France.

Alizée Porto (A)

Département de Chirurgie Cardiaque, CHU Timone, 13005 Marseille, France.

Pierre Morera (P)

Département de Chirurgie Cardiaque, CHU Timone, 13005 Marseille, France.

Vlad Gariboldi (V)

INSERM, Inra, C2VN, Aix Marseille La Timone University, 13005 Marseille, France.
Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France.
Département de Chirurgie Cardiaque, CHU Timone, 13005 Marseille, France.

Bernard Iung (B)

AP-HP, Cardiology Department, Bichat Hospital, Université Paris Cité, INSERM 1148, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France.

Thierry Lefevre (T)

Hopital Privé Jacques Cartier, 6 Av. Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France.

Philippe Commeau (P)

Cardiologie Interventionnelle, Polyclinique Les Fleurs, Groupe ELSAN, 83190 Ollioules, France.

Margaux Gouysse (M)

Clinityx, 78620 Acheres, France.

Florence du Chayla (F)

Clinityx, 78620 Acheres, France.

Nicolas Glatt (N)

Clinityx, 78620 Acheres, France.

Guillaume Cayla (G)

Department of Cardiology, CHU Nîmes, 30029 Nimes, France.

Herve Le Breton (H)

Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, 35033 Rennes, France.

Hakim Benamer (H)

Hopital Privé Jacques Cartier, 6 Av. Noyer Lambert, 91300 Massy, France.

Sylvain Beurtheret (S)

Saint-Joseph Hospital, 13000 Marseille, France.

Jean Philippe Verhoye (JP)

Rennes University Hospital, 35033 Rennes, France.

Helene Eltchaninoff (H)

Department of Cardiology, Normandie University, UNIROUEN, U1096, CHU Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France.

Martine Gilard (M)

Department of Cardiology, CHRU Brest, 29200 Brest, France.

Jean Philippe Collet (JP)

Department of Cardiology, Sorbonne Université, INSERM UMRS_1166, Pitié Salpêtrière (AP-HP), 75000 Paris, France.

Nicolas Dumonteil (N)

Groupe CardioVasculaire Interventionnel, Clinique Pasteur, 31300 Toulouse, France.

Frederic Collart (F)

INSERM, Inra, C2VN, Aix Marseille La Timone University, 13005 Marseille, France.
Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France.
Département de Cardiologie, CHU Bordeaux, 33075 Bordeaux, France.

Thomas Modine (T)

Département de Cardiologie, CHU Bordeaux, 33075 Bordeaux, France.

Thomas Cuisset (T)

Département de Cardiologie, CHU Timone, 13385 Marseille, France.
INSERM, Inra, C2VN, Aix Marseille La Timone University, 13005 Marseille, France.
Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France.

Classifications MeSH