Histomorphometrical and CBCT Evaluation of Tissue Loss Progression Induced by Consecutive, Alternate Ligatures in Experimental Peri-Implantitis in a Dog Model: A Pilot Study.
animal study
cone-beam CT
dental implant
histomorphometry
ligature induced
naturally occurring
peri-implantitis
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Oct 2022
20 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
08
09
2022
revised:
29
09
2022
accepted:
17
10
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soft and hard tissue breakdown was histologically and radiologically assessed around implants with alternate, consecutively placed ligatures on the same edentulous dog hemimandible. The influence of ligatured implants (LI) on adjacent non-ligatured implants (NLI, as a possible naturally induced peri-implantitis) was also evaluated. Three months after tooth extraction, five dental implants were placed in the dog hemimandible. Two months after abutment placement, ligatures were placed subsequently two months apart on alternate implants, while both intermediate implants were left without ligatures. Ligatures were kept in place during the entire experiment, and no plaque control measures were taken. Eleven months post-implantation, the animal was sacrificed. Undecalcified ground sections were cut, stained with Masson Goldner and MOVAT Pentachrome and evaluated by light microscopy. Soft and hard tissue loss was assessed using histomorphometric and CBCT parameters. All NLI presented deep false peri-implant pockets on the oral aspect and pronounced vertical bone resorption on the buccal aspect. After 2, 4 and 6 months, during the breakdown period, more than 30% of the bone was lost in LI in all directions, while, despite immediate vicinity, NLI displayed less destruction. Intense inflammation, typical for induced peri-implantitis, was present, with similar intensity in LI as NLI, but in different parts of the lesions. Morphometry confirmed intense soft tissue inflammation, more bone resorption and higher amounts of infiltrated connective tissue in LI when compared with NLI. Within the limits of the present pilot study, the adequacy of the experimental dog model based on ligature-induced peri-implantitis was able to be successfully challenged by non-ligature models of spontaneously occurring peri-implant inflammation, while meeting the requirements for experimental designs with a very small numbers of animals. The influence of implants with severe peri-implantitis on adjacent implants resulted in less than expected tissue loss in the latter accession numbers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36294510
pii: jcm11206188
doi: 10.3390/jcm11206188
pmc: PMC9605274
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):142-7
pubmed: 18184340
J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-3
pubmed: 12787220
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Mar;28(3):258-63
pubmed: 11284540
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S267-S290
pubmed: 29926957
J Periodontol. 2018 Dec;89(12):1442-1451
pubmed: 30014465
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Feb;15(1):23-33
pubmed: 14731174
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):403-8
pubmed: 25466474
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jan;38(1):58-64
pubmed: 21092053
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3121-3132
pubmed: 31916034
J Periodontol. 2000 Apr;71(4):546-9
pubmed: 10807116
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):292-304
pubmed: 18724857
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Aug;16(4):440-6
pubmed: 16117768
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 Mar;3(1):9-16
pubmed: 1420727
Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 07;2022:9984871
pubmed: 35178092
J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39(2):182-7
pubmed: 22136592
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Apr;10(2):111-9
pubmed: 10219130
Biomedicines. 2021 Oct 26;9(11):
pubmed: 34829765
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):997-1002
pubmed: 18828815
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993 Mar;4(1):12-22
pubmed: 8329532
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 25;8(2):
pubmed: 30823574
J Clin Med. 2018 Nov 28;7(12):
pubmed: 30486492
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):597-604
pubmed: 29575168
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Mar;38 Suppl 11:188-202
pubmed: 21323715
J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1367-78
pubmed: 20507230
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018 Jan 1;23(1):e30-e37
pubmed: 29274159
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021 Nov;57:78-84
pubmed: 34158874
J Oral Pathol. 1982 Aug;11(4):318-26
pubmed: 6809919
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Mar/Apr;37(3):e170-e179
pubmed: 28402352
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jan-Feb;22(1):117-26
pubmed: 17340905
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Aug;18(4):840-9
pubmed: 27238274
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Oct;38(10):939-49
pubmed: 21883358
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):655-61
pubmed: 17608738
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):783-91
pubmed: 23199435
Ann Periodontol. 2000 Dec;5(1):22-31
pubmed: 11885179
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Jun;10(3):195-203
pubmed: 10522179
Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;160(7):1577-9
pubmed: 20649561
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):845-9
pubmed: 15367187
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Oct;25(10):1119-24
pubmed: 23937287
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;16(4):349-54
pubmed: 22476693
J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Jun;22(6):475-9
pubmed: 7560227
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;18(4):355-72
pubmed: 23430020
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):534-45
pubmed: 26009904
J Invest Surg. 2014 Feb;27(1):50-6
pubmed: 23977842
J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Apr;33(4):290-5
pubmed: 16553638
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):533-44
pubmed: 10960987
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020 May 20;50(3):183-196
pubmed: 32617183
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Apr;20(4):366-71
pubmed: 19309770
Scand J Dent Res. 1975 May;83(3):189-92
pubmed: 1056098
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):690-6
pubmed: 22743774
Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;177(16):3617-3624
pubmed: 32662519
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Feb;42(2):196-203
pubmed: 25385434
Dent J (Basel). 2019 May 02;7(2):
pubmed: 31052495