Minimally Traumatic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Expert Opinion in 2010 and 2020.
atraumatic surgery
cochlear implants
electric acoustic stimulation (EAS)
hearing preservation
partial deafness treatment
Journal
Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Sep 2022
21 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
30
08
2022
revised:
14
09
2022
accepted:
17
09
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to discover expert opinion on the surgical techniques and materials most likely to achieve maximum postoperative residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant (CI) surgery and to determine how these opinions have changed since 2010. A previously published questionnaire used in a study published in 2010 was adapted and expanded. The questionnaire was distributed to an international group of experienced CI surgeons. Present results were compared, via descriptive statistics, to those from the 2010 survey. Eighteen surgeons completed the questionnaire. Respondents clearly favored the following: round window insertion, slow array insertion, and the peri- and postoperative use of systematic antibiotics. Insertion depth was regarded as important, and electrode arrays less likely to induce trauma were preferred. The usefulness of dedicated soft-surgery training was also recognized. A lack of agreement was found on whether the middle ear cavity should be flushed with a non-aminoglycoside antibiotic solution or whether a sheath or insertion tube should be used to avoid contaminating the array with blood or bone dust. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates how beliefs about CI soft surgery have changed since 2010 and shows areas of current consensus and disagreement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36294690
pii: jpm12101551
doi: 10.3390/jpm12101551
pmc: PMC9605439
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):962-8
pubmed: 21659922
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2013;(564):3-13
pubmed: 24328756
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jun;34(4):667-74
pubmed: 23640087
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;137(4):384-388
pubmed: 27918225
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Oct;77:101655
pubmed: 31539862
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jun;32(4):565-70
pubmed: 21478788
Laryngoscope. 2018 Aug;128(8):1939-1945
pubmed: 29330858
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Mar;40(3):e326-e335
pubmed: 30741914
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan;36(1):34-42
pubmed: 25299833
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Nov;157(5):837-847
pubmed: 28608735
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec;37(10):1516-1521
pubmed: 27608418
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Mar;37(3):235-40
pubmed: 26825671
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):e353-9
pubmed: 27631659
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jun 04;2019:5849871
pubmed: 31275978
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jun;38(5):678-684
pubmed: 28353622
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1307-13
pubmed: 27579839
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Sep;37(8):1006-15
pubmed: 27309713
Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):17-22
pubmed: 23006502
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;81:66-73
pubmed: 29794479
Cochlear Implants Int. 2018 Jan;19(1):1-13
pubmed: 29073844
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Mar;39(3):299-305
pubmed: 29342054
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):43-50
pubmed: 25549811
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):e256-69
pubmed: 25233333
HNO. 1993 Jul;41(7):356-9
pubmed: 8376183
Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov;124 Suppl 6:S1-7
pubmed: 24764083
Acta Otolaryngol. 2018 Dec;138(12):1080-1085
pubmed: 30702034
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Apr 22;24:2437-2445
pubmed: 29680860
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;22(5):349-52
pubmed: 25101938
Int J Audiol. 2021 Aug;60(8):561-577
pubmed: 33426931
Acta Otolaryngol. 2020 Aug;140(8):632-638
pubmed: 32498646
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):849-857
pubmed: 30252685
PLoS One. 2017 May 15;12(5):e0174900
pubmed: 28505158
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:108-115
pubmed: 19955727