Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Free Nipple-Areola Graft after Circumareolar (Skin Reducing) Mastectomy.
DIEP-flap
circumareolar mastectomy
free nipple areola graft
immediate autologous breast reconstruction
inner thigh-flap
large/ptotic breasts
oncological safety
risk-reducing mastectomy
scarless mastopexy
Journal
Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Sep 2022
26 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
12
09
2022
revised:
19
09
2022
accepted:
22
09
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) led to a paradigm shift in breast reconstruction. Primary reconstructions have become the therapy of choice. At the same time, immediate autologous reconstructions are oncologically safe and aesthetically pleasing. Our preferred SSM incision is the circumareolar with removal of nipple and areola (NAC). Adjustment of the skin envelope is well accomplished in mild-to-moderate ptotic breasts. We describe our technique consisting of circumareolar incision in SSM, keeping the NAC as a free graft, and immediate autologous reconstruction and immediate free NAC grafting on the flap. Aesthetic indications are slight asymmetries, ptotic breasts, large breasts where the reconstructed breast will be smaller than the original breast and where a Wise pattern is not indicated. Oncologic indications are risk-reducing mastectomies and tumors close to the NAC where resection would compromise the vitality of the NAC. We evaluated the healing of the NAC and the NAC position with regard to the breast shape. From 2019-2022, 296 autologous flaps were used for breast reconstruction. In 36 flaps, this technique was applied. Eighteen flaps were bilateral (nine patients). In total, we performed 15 inner thigh flaps and 21 DIEP flaps. No flap or NAC loss occurred. There was no wound healing complication at the breast, and no adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy needed to be postponed. The advantages of this technique are (1) scar reduction with only one periareolar scar on the breast, which is also well concealed; (2) oncological safety in relation to the nipple and optimal visibility of the mastectomy cavity, which allows a meticulous mastectomy, especially important in risk-reducing mastectomies; (3) generally, fewer wound healing problems, especially fewer than with Wise pattern incision; (4) primary adjustment of the skin envelope and positioning of the NAC are easier to perform than in a secondary procedure; and (5) that the NAC is spared, and no secondary reconstruction is necessary. Disadvantages are that (1) the NAC must heal as a free graft and (2) that the sensitivity of the NAC is lower than in pedicled NAC transposition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36294726
pii: jpm12101588
doi: 10.3390/jpm12101588
pmc: PMC9605625
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Genes (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;12(2):
pubmed: 33578759
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;43(2):313-327
pubmed: 30746565
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Dec;74(12):3443-3476
pubmed: 34697003
Br J Plast Surg. 2000 Mar;53(2):126-9
pubmed: 10878835
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 23;12(3):
pubmed: 35330332
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Dec;72(12):1930-1935
pubmed: 31628083
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):123-129
pubmed: 28903167
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 May;26(5):1254-1262
pubmed: 30830538
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 May 1;88(5):485-489
pubmed: 34711731
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 28;8(9):e3138
pubmed: 33133977
Clin Plast Surg. 1984 Apr;11(2):369-81
pubmed: 6723201
Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):276-81
pubmed: 16400706
Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(6):S112-5
pubmed: 24374396
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 02;10(3):e4167
pubmed: 35261843
Br J Plast Surg. 1974 Oct;27(4):308-10
pubmed: 4473242
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 25;12(3):
pubmed: 35330347
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017 Mar 13;9:141-152
pubmed: 28331365
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):44S-50S
pubmed: 29064921
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):535-541
pubmed: 32032724
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Apr;143(4):688e-697e
pubmed: 30921113
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Apr;101(5):1228-34
pubmed: 9529206
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977 Feb;59(2):200-5
pubmed: 834777