Retrospective Analysis of Doses Delivered during Embolization Procedures over the Last 10 Years.
CT scan
dose optimization
embolization
interventional radiology
Journal
Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Oct 2022
12 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
09
07
2022
revised:
31
08
2022
accepted:
06
10
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: This study aimed to retrospectively analyze dosimetric indicators recorded since 2012 for thoracic, abdominal or pelvic embolizations to evaluate the contribution of new tools and technologies in dose reduction. Methods: Dosimetric indicators (dose area product (DAP) and air kerma (AK)) from 1449 embolizations were retrospectively reviewed from August 2012 to March 2022. A total of 1089 embolizations were performed in an older fixed C-Arm system (A1), 222 in a newer fixed C-Arm system (A2) and 138 in a 4DCT system (A3). The embolization procedures were gathered to compare A1, A2 and A3. Results: DAP were significantly lower with A2 compared to A1 for all procedures (median −50% ± 5%, p < 0.05), except for uterine elective embolizations and gonadal vein embolization. The DAP values were significantly lower with A3 than with A1 (p < 0.001). CT scan was used for guidance in 90% of embolization procedures. Conclusions: The last C-Arm technology allowed a median reduction of 50% of the X-ray dose. The implementation of a CT scan inside the IR room allowed for more precise 3D-guidance with no increase of the dose delivered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36294840
pii: jpm12101701
doi: 10.3390/jpm12101701
pmc: PMC9605272
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022 Jul-Aug;103(7-8):338-344
pubmed: 35183486
Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332
pubmed: 18082557
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018 May;99(5):321-329
pubmed: 29396087
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021 Jul-Aug;102(7-8):479-487
pubmed: 33893060
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Nov;42(11):1609-1618
pubmed: 31222382
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:284-288
pubmed: 28027761
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jul;20(7 Suppl):S263-73
pubmed: 19560006
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):5071-5081
pubmed: 32333144
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Nov;101(11):707-713
pubmed: 33012694
Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):326-41
pubmed: 20093507
Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):321-32
pubmed: 20959547
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Dec;97:115-118
pubmed: 29153361
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Aug;28(8):1129-1135.e1
pubmed: 28457758
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jul;177(1):3-11
pubmed: 11418388
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Aug;14(8):977-90
pubmed: 12902555
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4281-4290
pubmed: 28289939
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505
pubmed: 22681860
Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3255-62
pubmed: 25956933
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021 Mar;102(3):119-120
pubmed: 33518450
Acta Radiol. 2018 Dec;59(12):1446-1450
pubmed: 29486598
Ann ICRP. 2000;30(2):7-67
pubmed: 11459599
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):502-508
pubmed: 29090348
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 07;12(3):
pubmed: 35330414
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022 Jan;103(1):3-11
pubmed: 34456172
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):5743-5755
pubmed: 34418110