Total body irradiation for standard treatment rooms: a robust sweeping beam technique with respect to the body shape.

TBI arc therapy patient comfort sweeping beam technique total body irradiation

Journal

Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
ISSN: 1507-1367
Titre abrégé: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 100885761

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 15 12 2022
accepted: 23 02 2022
entrez: 27 10 2022
pubmed: 28 10 2022
medline: 28 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The purpose of this work is to improve a sweeping beam technique for total body irradiation (TBI) on a low flat couch using a varying patient thickness model. We designed a flat couch for total body irradiation in supine and prone position. Three generic arcs with rectangular segments for a patient torso thickness of 16, 22 and 28 cm were generated with respect to varying patient thickness of four particular parts of the body: head, torso, thighs and calves. Longitudinal and transversal dose profiles were measured using an ionization chamber and the EBT3 gafchromic film in a solid water slab phantom. The robustness of the method was examined in phantoms of different thicknesses. Measured dose homogeneity stays within ±10% of prescribed dose for all of the three patient thickness models. The robustness of the method was evaluated as the increase in dose in the phantom center of 0.7% per 1 cm reduction in phantom thickness. The method is applicable for the broad range of patient sizes, comfortable for patients, robust and suitable for standard treatment rooms with a standard linear accelerator. It requires minimal investments into equipment.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this work is to improve a sweeping beam technique for total body irradiation (TBI) on a low flat couch using a varying patient thickness model. We designed a flat couch for total body irradiation in supine and prone position. Three generic arcs with rectangular segments for a patient torso thickness of 16, 22 and 28 cm were generated with respect to varying patient thickness of four particular parts of the body: head, torso, thighs and calves.
Materials and methods UNASSIGNED
Longitudinal and transversal dose profiles were measured using an ionization chamber and the EBT3 gafchromic film in a solid water slab phantom. The robustness of the method was examined in phantoms of different thicknesses.
Results UNASSIGNED
Measured dose homogeneity stays within ±10% of prescribed dose for all of the three patient thickness models. The robustness of the method was evaluated as the increase in dose in the phantom center of 0.7% per 1 cm reduction in phantom thickness.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The method is applicable for the broad range of patient sizes, comfortable for patients, robust and suitable for standard treatment rooms with a standard linear accelerator. It requires minimal investments into equipment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36299377
doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0039
pii: rpor-27-2-268
pmc: PMC9591034
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

268-274

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest None declared.

Références

Med Phys. 2009 Aug;36(8):3844-55
pubmed: 19746817
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 29;11:47-53
pubmed: 33458277
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 18;13(1):180
pubmed: 30227866
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Mar;18(5):981-6
pubmed: 10694547
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):553-7
pubmed: 24440045
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Mar;19(2):103-110
pubmed: 29368389
J Med Phys. 2006 Jan;31(1):5-12
pubmed: 21206634
Cancer. 2014 Sep 1;120(17):2760-5
pubmed: 24804873
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan;20(1):200-211
pubmed: 30592152
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Mar 08;17(2):63-73
pubmed: 27074473
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012 Aug 21;17(6):367-75
pubmed: 24377040

Auteurs

Iva Bratova (I)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Petr Paluska (P)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Jakub Grepl (J)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Department of Radiobiology, University of Defence in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Igor Sirak (I)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Jiri Petera (J)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Milan Vosmik (M)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH