A flexible Python-based touchscreen chamber for operant conditioning reveals improved visual perception of cardinal orientations in mice.
Python
behavior
natural scenes
operant conditioning
orientation discrimination
touchscreen chamber
Journal
Frontiers in cellular neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5102
Titre abrégé: Front Cell Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477935
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
01
2022
accepted:
09
09
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Natural scenes are composed of a wide range of edge angles and spatial frequencies, with a strong overrepresentation of vertical and horizontal edges. Correspondingly, many mammalian species are much better at discriminating these cardinal orientations compared to obliques. A potential reason for this increased performance could be an increased number of neurons in the visual cortex that are tuned to cardinal orientations, which is likely to be an adaptation to the natural scene statistics. Such biased angular tuning has recently been shown in the mouse primary visual cortex. However, it is still unknown if mice also show a perceptual dominance of cardinal orientations. Here, we describe the design of a novel custom-built touchscreen chamber that allows testing natural scene perception and orientation discrimination performance by applying different task designs. Using this chamber, we applied an iterative convergence towards orientation discrimination thresholds for cardinal or oblique orientations in different cohorts of mice. Surprisingly, the expert discrimination performance was similar for both groups but showed large inter-individual differences in performance and training time. To study the discrimination of cardinal and oblique stimuli in the same mice, we, therefore, applied, a different training regime where mice learned to discriminate cardinal and oblique gratings in parallel. Parallel training revealed a higher task performance for cardinal orientations in an early phase of the training. The performance for both orientations became similar after prolonged training, suggesting that learning permits equally high perceptual tuning towards oblique stimuli. In summary, our custom-built touchscreen chamber offers a flexible tool to test natural visual perception in rodents and revealed a training-induced increase in the perception of oblique gratings. The touchscreen chamber is entirely open-source, easy to build, and freely available to the scientific community to conduct visual or multimodal behavioral studies. It is also based on the FAIR principles for data management and sharing and could therefore serve as a catalyst for testing the perception of complex and natural visual stimuli across behavioral labs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36299493
doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.866109
pmc: PMC9588922
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
866109Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wiesbrock, Musall and Kampa.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Mar 10;10:42
pubmed: 27014004
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 03;8:14637
pubmed: 28256514
Neuron. 2022 Jul 6;110(13):2080-2093.e10
pubmed: 35609615
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jun;3(6):535-6
pubmed: 10816307
Front Mol Neurosci. 2020 Feb 28;13:30
pubmed: 32180705
Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):549-53
pubmed: 11484056
Somatosens Mot Res. 2010;27(4):131-48
pubmed: 20954892
Science. 2021 Apr 16;372(6539):
pubmed: 33859006
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jan;46(2):432-441
pubmed: 33007776
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Nov;15(11):1596-603
pubmed: 23023292
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jan 31;11:16
pubmed: 28197083
Science. 2013 May 10;340(6133):756-9
pubmed: 23661762
Nat Protoc. 2013 Oct;8(10):1985-2005
pubmed: 24051960
Learn Mem. 2008 Jul 08;15(7):516-23
pubmed: 18612068
Elife. 2018 Sep 17;7:
pubmed: 30222107
Neuron. 2007 Oct 4;56(1):43-57
pubmed: 17920014
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10
pubmed: 19198666
Vision Res. 2000;40(16):2201-9
pubmed: 10878281
Elife. 2019 Dec 11;8:
pubmed: 31825307
J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 16;26(33):8451-64
pubmed: 16914670
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Oct;22(10):1677-1686
pubmed: 31551604
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Sep 03;14:159
pubmed: 33088265
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(19):3128-3135.e8
pubmed: 30220502
Neuron. 2015 Jun 17;86(6):1478-90
pubmed: 26051421
Psychol Bull. 1972 Oct;78(4):266-78
pubmed: 4562947
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Dec;108(12):3416-23
pubmed: 23019000
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 15;40(3):648-660
pubmed: 31792152
Vision Res. 2016 Oct;127:74-83
pubmed: 27497283
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16309-17
pubmed: 22072682
Int J Neurosci. 1989 Sep;48(1-2):29-69
pubmed: 2684886
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 22;8(1):1379
pubmed: 29358739
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1193-216
pubmed: 11520932
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13
pubmed: 17254636
Vision Res. 1997 Jan;37(2):235-42
pubmed: 9068823
Curr Biol. 2020 May 18;30(10):1866-1880.e5
pubmed: 32243857
J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 11;32(28):9716-26
pubmed: 22787057
Nat Methods. 2019 Jan;16(1):11-13
pubmed: 30573833
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep;21(9):1281-1289
pubmed: 30127430
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 Jan;28(8):811-25
pubmed: 15642623
Front Cell Neurosci. 2010 Mar 12;4:3
pubmed: 20407583
Nature. 2018 Feb 15;554(7692):368-372
pubmed: 29414944
Genes Brain Behav. 2021 Jan;20(1):e12695
pubmed: 32812350
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7852):86-92
pubmed: 33473216
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun 05;14(7):926-32
pubmed: 21642976
Elife. 2019 Aug 14;8:
pubmed: 31411559
Nat Protoc. 2013 Oct;8(10):1961-84
pubmed: 24051959
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 24;11(1):1986
pubmed: 32332741