Outcomes of root canal treatment of first permanent molars among children in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A retrospective cohort study.
Endodontics
Failure
First permanent molar
Root canal treatment
Success
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
27
02
2022
revised:
10
04
2022
accepted:
11
10
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The first permanent molar (FPM) is considered the tooth most susceptible to caries, as it is the first permanent tooth to erupt in the oral cavity, making it susceptible to environmental conditions that may appear as caries, hypoplasia, or hypomineralization This retrospective cohort study was conducted at three major centers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Children aged 9-18 years who underwent an RCT between 2010 and 2019 were included. Clinical and radiographic examinations were also performed. Based on the loose criteria, most of the evaluated teeth (79.6%) were successfully treated. The treatment failed in only 20.4% of participants. Older patients and teeth with acceptable restoration quality had an increased success rate compared to younger patients and teeth with unacceptable restoration quality. A shorter time lapse between treatment and assessment resulted in a lower success rate compared to a longer time lapse. Based on strict criteria, 72.9% of the patients were successfully treated. The use of a microscope and teeth with acceptable restoration quality resulted in an increased success rate compared to teeth treated without the microscope and with unacceptable restoration quality. The success rate of this procedure was high. Several factors, including older age, acceptable restoration quality, and the use of a microscope, increase the probability of success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36299517
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11104
pii: S2405-8440(22)02392-1
pmc: PMC9589176
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11104Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
J Endod. 2011 Jul;37(7):895-902
pubmed: 21689541
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Feb;7(1A):201-26
pubmed: 14972061
Int Endod J. 2003 Apr;36(4):296-301
pubmed: 12702125
Int Dent J. 2002 Apr;52(2):81-6
pubmed: 12013255
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):121
pubmed: 28859642
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):379-384
pubmed: 32440041
J Endod. 1990 Oct;16(10):498-504
pubmed: 2084204
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Autumn;2(3):201-8
pubmed: 20467630
Br Dent J. 2007 Oct 13;203(7):E14; discussion 408-9
pubmed: 17660753
Aust Endod J. 2013 Aug;39(2):48-56
pubmed: 23890259
Pediatr Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;35(5):E157-64
pubmed: 24290544
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994 Oct;22(5 Pt 1):286-8
pubmed: 7813177
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Oct;16(5):409-15
pubmed: 25894249
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983 Jul;56(1):89-96
pubmed: 6576315
J Endod. 2001 Dec;27(12):791-6
pubmed: 11771594
Int Endod J. 2011 Jul;44(7):583-609
pubmed: 21366626
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1970 Oct;30(4):533-6
pubmed: 4917275
Swiss Dent J. 2016;126(11):1007-1027
pubmed: 27874916
J Endod. 2002 May;28(5):391-5
pubmed: 12026926
J Endod. 2004 Dec;30(12):846-50
pubmed: 15564861
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):59
pubmed: 29622000
Int Endod J. 2011 Jul;44(7):610-25
pubmed: 21366627