Challenges of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management From the Perspective of Patients: Conventional Content Analysis.
Iran
challenges
conventional content analysis
diabetes mellitus
disease management
Journal
Interactive journal of medical research
ISSN: 1929-073X
Titre abrégé: Interact J Med Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101598421
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Oct 2022
27 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
15
08
2022
accepted:
23
09
2022
revised:
01
09
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
28
10
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) face significant challenges in the treatment process, which can have a negative impact on disease management. Proper management of the disease can reduce symptoms and complications, improve glycemic indices, and reduce mortality and readmission. Given the influential role of patients in prevention and self-care, this study was conducted to explore the challenges of diabetes management from the perspective of patients. Two rounds of focus group discussions with T2DM patients were conducted. The principal investigator of the study and a research assistant compiled a list of volunteer patients with names and contact information and selected participants based on their medical information. Participants were chosen via a purposive sampling technique. The questions were designed to encourage patients to share their views on how the treatment team communicates and participates in treatment, how they are trained, and the health care system. The discussion continued until data saturation. During 2 rounds of focus group discussions, the voices of the participants were recorded by 2 voice recorders, and one of the team members was a transcriber. After discussion, participant views were transcribed, and common issues were identified, sorted, and reported as categories and subcategories. According to the conventional content analysis, 88 primary codes were extracted from the detailed and in-depth description of the participants. The codes were summarized after repeated readings and classified based on their similarities and semantic relevance. Through analysis and comparison, 4 categories and 7 subcategories were identified: communication challenges (poor medical staff communication, lack of psychological support), challenges to participation in treatment (lack of patient participation), educational challenges (training program bugs, inadequate training), and challenges of the health care system (inefficiency of the care system, caregiver inefficiency). This study showed that the treatment team members should pay more attention to the challenges of care and treatment from the perspective of patients with T2DM. Therefore, recommendations for future policies to overcome these obstacles include establishing a multidisciplinary health care team; using trained health care workers to provide organized treatment and care services; holding individual counseling sessions with patients in need of counseling; and providing counseling services, involving patients in the treatment and self-care process, and designing a comprehensive diabetes education program with an emphasis on education. Necessary information should be provided to the patients, and effective communicate should address patient concerns.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) face significant challenges in the treatment process, which can have a negative impact on disease management. Proper management of the disease can reduce symptoms and complications, improve glycemic indices, and reduce mortality and readmission.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Given the influential role of patients in prevention and self-care, this study was conducted to explore the challenges of diabetes management from the perspective of patients.
METHODS
METHODS
Two rounds of focus group discussions with T2DM patients were conducted. The principal investigator of the study and a research assistant compiled a list of volunteer patients with names and contact information and selected participants based on their medical information. Participants were chosen via a purposive sampling technique. The questions were designed to encourage patients to share their views on how the treatment team communicates and participates in treatment, how they are trained, and the health care system. The discussion continued until data saturation. During 2 rounds of focus group discussions, the voices of the participants were recorded by 2 voice recorders, and one of the team members was a transcriber. After discussion, participant views were transcribed, and common issues were identified, sorted, and reported as categories and subcategories.
RESULTS
RESULTS
According to the conventional content analysis, 88 primary codes were extracted from the detailed and in-depth description of the participants. The codes were summarized after repeated readings and classified based on their similarities and semantic relevance. Through analysis and comparison, 4 categories and 7 subcategories were identified: communication challenges (poor medical staff communication, lack of psychological support), challenges to participation in treatment (lack of patient participation), educational challenges (training program bugs, inadequate training), and challenges of the health care system (inefficiency of the care system, caregiver inefficiency).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that the treatment team members should pay more attention to the challenges of care and treatment from the perspective of patients with T2DM. Therefore, recommendations for future policies to overcome these obstacles include establishing a multidisciplinary health care team; using trained health care workers to provide organized treatment and care services; holding individual counseling sessions with patients in need of counseling; and providing counseling services, involving patients in the treatment and self-care process, and designing a comprehensive diabetes education program with an emphasis on education. Necessary information should be provided to the patients, and effective communicate should address patient concerns.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36301605
pii: v11i2e41933
doi: 10.2196/41933
pmc: PMC9650573
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e41933Informations de copyright
©Soghra Nikpour, Neda Mehrdad, Mahnaz Sanjari, Maryam Aalaa, Ramin Heshmat, Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad, Bagher Larijani, Mahin Nomali, Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 27.10.2022.
Références
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;14(2):88-98
pubmed: 29219149
J Diabetes Complications. 2020 Dec;34(12):107688
pubmed: 32917487
Health Care Women Int. 1992 Jul-Sep;13(3):313-21
pubmed: 1399871
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 18;7(1):13461
pubmed: 29044139
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
J Diabetes. 2018 May;10(5):353-356
pubmed: 29345068
Br Dent J. 2018 Oct 05;:
pubmed: 30287965
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jun;5(12):254
pubmed: 28706922
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 4;15(9):e0237542
pubmed: 32886663
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(2):104-109
pubmed: 30961501
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;93(1):1-9
pubmed: 21382643
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Mar 21;10(1):131
pubmed: 28327202
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jan;29(1):149-156
pubmed: 29952223
Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Dec;26(6):431-442
pubmed: 33222755
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 08;9:1413-22
pubmed: 26504375
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107840
pubmed: 31733978
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Oct 30;30(11):1973-1979
pubmed: 32811740
Nurse Res. 2021 Mar 11;29(1):14-20
pubmed: 33629547
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0136202
pubmed: 26383535
Int J Integr Care. 2010 Sep 27;10:
pubmed: 20922068
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 29;22(1):127
pubmed: 35093046
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 13;19(2):e36
pubmed: 28193599
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Mar;115:103842
pubmed: 33383271
Semin Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;34(1):47-53
pubmed: 33757635
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 27;11:534873
pubmed: 33329377
Popul Health Metr. 2016 Nov 21;14:43
pubmed: 27895533
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Oct;42(5):470-477.e2
pubmed: 29449096
Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):498-501
pubmed: 26759142
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017 Jul 31;9(1):e1-e8
pubmed: 28828879
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Sep;16(9):841-9
pubmed: 24635880
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Jul 8;2018:4930157
pubmed: 30225268
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Dec;26(2_suppl):55-63
pubmed: 31766913
Prim Care Diabetes. 2011 Dec;5(4):251-5
pubmed: 21782539
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jul;28(8):1267-1282
pubmed: 29542395
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Oct;25(10):952-959
pubmed: 30372366
Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2018 Feb 17;34(1):
pubmed: 29453924
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 14;15:377
pubmed: 26369788
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 Feb;25(1):72-93
pubmed: 24509014