Do aqueous solutions contain net charge?
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
04
01
2022
accepted:
27
09
2022
entrez:
27
10
2022
pubmed:
28
10
2022
medline:
1
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Solutions with high pH values are sometimes thought to contain net negative charge because of an excess of OH- groups, while solutions with low pH values are thought opposite. To follow up on these speculations, we used a simple electrochemical cell to study three types of solution: electrolyzed waters with differing pH values; acids and bases with different pH values; and various salt solutions. When electrolyzed waters of various pH values were tested against water of pH 7, we found that acidic waters were indeed positively charged, while basic waters were negatively charged. We found much the same when standard acids and bases were compared to reference solutions: acidic solutions were positively charged while basic solutions were negatively charged. Various salts, including NaCl, KCl, Na2SO4, and K2SO4, were also tested against DI water (containing trace amounts of NaCl to lend conductivity). Surprisingly, all salts were found to be negatively charged, more so as their concentrations increased. This collection of results supports the hypothesis that at least some aqueous solutions may contain net charge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36301987
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275953
pii: PONE-D-22-00156
pmc: PMC9612516
doi:
Substances chimiques
Salts
0
Sodium Chloride
451W47IQ8X
Water
059QF0KO0R
Acids
0
Solutions
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0275953Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Jul;121(7):431-4
pubmed: 22844861
J Environ Radioact. 2017 Feb;167:166-169
pubmed: 27839844
Biol Sport. 2017 Sep;34(3):255-261
pubmed: 29158619
Med Gas Res. 2019 Jan 09;8(4):160-166
pubmed: 30713669