Future public health emergencies and disasters: sustainability and insights into support programs for healthcare providers.
COVID-19 pandemic
Disaster
Emergency
Healthcare delivery
Healthcare workers
Mental health provider
Mental health supports
Work and Mental Health
Workplace-based programs
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 10 2022
27 10 2022
Historique:
received:
13
03
2022
accepted:
04
10
2022
entrez:
28
10
2022
pubmed:
29
10
2022
medline:
1
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) has been at the forefront throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While workplace-based support programs have been developed in hospitals globally, few systematically collected data. While critical to their success, information on these programs and the experience of mental healthcare providers (MHP) who support colleagues is limited. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of MHP caring for HCW colleagues within a novel workplace-based mental health support program during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide insights on facilitators, areas for improvement and barriers to program sustainability. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews conducted by videoconference between September 2020 to October 2021. UHN CARES (University Health Network Coping and Resilience for Employees and Staff) Program was developed during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. It supports over 21,000 staff members within the UHN, Canada's largest academic health research institution, in Toronto, Canada. Purposive sampling was used to select 10 of the 22 MHP in the UHN CARES Program (n = 10). Using a critical realism framework, key components required to sustain a successful workplace-based mental health support program for HCWs and balance the needs of MHP were determined. Six psychiatrists and four psychologists (n = 10) with varying roles at UHN participated in 17 interviews, including seven repeat interviews exploring changes over time within the pandemic and program. Components which facilitated the success of the program included flexibility in scheduling, confidential health record storage, comprehensive administrative support, availability of resources and adaptive quality improvement approach. Recommendations for improvement included opportunities for peer supervision, triaging of cases, and managing HCW expectations. MHP found caring for HCWs to be meaningful and they utilized existing clinical skills during sessions. Challenges included working in a virtual setting, navigating boundaries when caring for colleagues, and managing the range of service users and their needs. These findings suggest how support programs can be structured for HCWs, how to provide support, and how to sustain this support, allowing health systems to balance the needs of HCWs and MHPs in preparation for future public health emergencies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) has been at the forefront throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While workplace-based support programs have been developed in hospitals globally, few systematically collected data. While critical to their success, information on these programs and the experience of mental healthcare providers (MHP) who support colleagues is limited. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of MHP caring for HCW colleagues within a novel workplace-based mental health support program during the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide insights on facilitators, areas for improvement and barriers to program sustainability.
METHODS
This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews conducted by videoconference between September 2020 to October 2021. UHN CARES (University Health Network Coping and Resilience for Employees and Staff) Program was developed during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. It supports over 21,000 staff members within the UHN, Canada's largest academic health research institution, in Toronto, Canada. Purposive sampling was used to select 10 of the 22 MHP in the UHN CARES Program (n = 10). Using a critical realism framework, key components required to sustain a successful workplace-based mental health support program for HCWs and balance the needs of MHP were determined.
RESULTS
Six psychiatrists and four psychologists (n = 10) with varying roles at UHN participated in 17 interviews, including seven repeat interviews exploring changes over time within the pandemic and program. Components which facilitated the success of the program included flexibility in scheduling, confidential health record storage, comprehensive administrative support, availability of resources and adaptive quality improvement approach. Recommendations for improvement included opportunities for peer supervision, triaging of cases, and managing HCW expectations. MHP found caring for HCWs to be meaningful and they utilized existing clinical skills during sessions. Challenges included working in a virtual setting, navigating boundaries when caring for colleagues, and managing the range of service users and their needs.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest how support programs can be structured for HCWs, how to provide support, and how to sustain this support, allowing health systems to balance the needs of HCWs and MHPs in preparation for future public health emergencies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36303172
doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04309-z
pii: 10.1186/s12888-022-04309-z
pmc: PMC9612620
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
664Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
CMAJ. 2003 May 13;168(10):1245-51
pubmed: 12743065
Respirology. 2022 Jun;27(6):411-426
pubmed: 35048469
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3336
pubmed: 32876293
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Jan;59(1):91-5
pubmed: 18182545
BJPsych Open. 2021 Mar 23;7(2):e70
pubmed: 33752774
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jun;66(4):353-60
pubmed: 22624741
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 21;5(9):e30280
pubmed: 34406967
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Sep;55(9):1055-7
pubmed: 15345768
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Int Nurs Rev. 2018 Mar;65(1):41-53
pubmed: 28295314
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Nov - Dec;67:62-69
pubmed: 33059217
Clin Med Res. 2016 Mar;14(1):7-14
pubmed: 26847480
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):495-504
pubmed: 34237771
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;:7067437221111372
pubmed: 35854421
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 12;21(1):250
pubmed: 33980215
J Health Psychol. 2020 Jun;25(7):883-887
pubmed: 32370621
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):s11-8
pubmed: 18702283
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022 Jan-Apr;22(1):100256
pubmed: 34429729
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;8(4):
pubmed: 33138164