Transcranial magnetic stimulation tractography and the facilitation of gross total resection in a patient with a motor eloquent glioblastoma: illustrative case.

TMS tractography glioma intraoperative mapping motor eloquent

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons
ISSN: 2694-1902
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Case Lessons
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918227275606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 May 2022
Historique:
received: 15 03 2022
accepted: 21 03 2022
entrez: 28 10 2022
pubmed: 29 10 2022
medline: 29 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In patients with perieloquent tumors, neurosurgeons must use a variety of techniques to maximize survival while minimizing postoperative neurological morbidity. Recent publications have shown that conventional anatomical features may not always predict postoperative deficits. Additionally, scientific conceptualizations of complex brain function have shifted toward more dynamic, neuroplastic theories instead of traditional static, localizationist models. Functional imaging techniques have emerged as potential tools to incorporate these advances into modern neurosurgical care. In this case report, we describe our observations using preoperative transcranial magnetic stimulation data combined with tractography to guide a nontraditional surgical approach in a patient with a motor eloquent glioblastoma. The authors detail the use of preoperative functional and structural imaging to perform a gross total resection despite tumor infiltration of conventionally eloquent anatomical structures. The authors resected the precentral gyrus, specifically the paracentral lobule, localized using intraoperative mapping techniques. The patient demonstrated mild transient postoperative weakness and made a full neurological recovery by discharge 1 week later. Preoperative functional and structural imaging has potential to not only optimize patient selection and surgical planning, but also facilitate important intraoperative decisions. Innovative preoperative imaging techniques should be optimized and used to identify safely resectable structures.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In patients with perieloquent tumors, neurosurgeons must use a variety of techniques to maximize survival while minimizing postoperative neurological morbidity. Recent publications have shown that conventional anatomical features may not always predict postoperative deficits. Additionally, scientific conceptualizations of complex brain function have shifted toward more dynamic, neuroplastic theories instead of traditional static, localizationist models. Functional imaging techniques have emerged as potential tools to incorporate these advances into modern neurosurgical care. In this case report, we describe our observations using preoperative transcranial magnetic stimulation data combined with tractography to guide a nontraditional surgical approach in a patient with a motor eloquent glioblastoma.
OBSERVATIONS METHODS
The authors detail the use of preoperative functional and structural imaging to perform a gross total resection despite tumor infiltration of conventionally eloquent anatomical structures. The authors resected the precentral gyrus, specifically the paracentral lobule, localized using intraoperative mapping techniques. The patient demonstrated mild transient postoperative weakness and made a full neurological recovery by discharge 1 week later.
LESSONS CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative functional and structural imaging has potential to not only optimize patient selection and surgical planning, but also facilitate important intraoperative decisions. Innovative preoperative imaging techniques should be optimized and used to identify safely resectable structures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36303481
doi: 10.3171/CASE22128
pii: CASE22128
pmc: PMC9379643
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Neurosurgery. 1996 May;38(5):962-70
pubmed: 8727822
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102435
pubmed: 32980599
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 11;14(2):
pubmed: 35053503
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Feb;28(2):E3
pubmed: 20121438
Neurosurgery. 2012 Dec;71(6):1170-83; discussion 1183-4
pubmed: 22986591
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):774-82
pubmed: 24516010
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1600-9
pubmed: 22659445
Neurosurgery. 2017 Feb 1;80(2):287-299
pubmed: 28175893
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;21(6):1011-7
pubmed: 24679940
Neurosci Res. 2009 Oct;65(2):131-5
pubmed: 19616045
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 13;11:748691
pubmed: 34966669
Epilepsia. 2017 May;58(5):772-780
pubmed: 28332711
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Feb 1;48(2):E6
pubmed: 32006950
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 May 28;16(2):349-354
pubmed: 34268163

Auteurs

Matthew Muir (M)

1Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Sarah Prinsloo (S)

1Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Jeffrey I Traylor (JI)

2Department of Neurological Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Rajan Patel (R)

4Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Chibawanye Ene (C)

1Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Sudhakar Tummala (S)

3Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and.

Sujit S Prabhu (SS)

1Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Classifications MeSH