Pre-endoscopy Symptoms and Age, But Not Esophageal Biopsy Number Are Associated With Post-endoscopy Adverse Events.
Journal
Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
ISSN: 1536-4801
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8211545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2022
01 11 2022
Historique:
entrez:
28
10
2022
pubmed:
29
10
2022
medline:
2
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a frequently utilized investigative tool in the management of gastrointestinal conditions in children. Biopsies obtained during EGD may pose risk for post-operative adverse events (AEs), and further understanding of risk is imperative to provide informed consent to families and safe patient care. In particular, the impact of biopsy number and location on the development of AEs has not been studied in pediatric patients. We prospectively assessed for AEs by telephone survey 3-7 days after 209 EGDs performed on patients ages 1-21 years over a 1-year period. Demographic, endoscopic, and histologic data were collected. The most common symptoms reported were throat pain (61%), chest pain (26%), and dysphagia (26%). Binary regression models identified age and pre-operative symptoms as factors that influenced the likelihood of post-operative morbidity. Multiple biopsies from 3 different locations of the esophagus did not impact the risk of post-operative AEs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36305884
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003594
pii: 00005176-202211000-00020
pmc: PMC9627599
mid: NIHMS1830036
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
656-660Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : K08 DK097721
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by European Society for European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Thakkar K, El-Serag HB, Mattek N, et al. Complications of pediatric EGD: a 4-year experience in PEDS-CORI. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:213–21.
Samer AM, Pfefferkorn MD, Croffie JM, et al. Complications after outpatient upper GI endoscopy in children: 30-day follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1508–11.
Kramer RE, Narkewicz MR. Adverse events following gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: classifications, characterization, and implications. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62:828–33.
Attard TM, Miller M, Lee B, et al. Pediatric elective diagnostic procedure complications: a multicenter cohort analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;34:147–53.
Attard TM, Grima AM, Thomson M. Pediatric endoscopic procedure complications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018;20:48.
Hsu EK, Chugh P, Kronman MP, et al. Incidence of perforation in pediatric GI endoscopy and colonoscopy: an 11-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:960–6.
Igbal CW, Askegard-Glesmann JR, Pham TH, et al. Pediatric endoscopic injuries: incidence, management, and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:911–5.
Tringali A, Balassone V, De Angelis P, et al. Complications in pediatric endoscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30:825–39.
Levine DS, Blount PL, Rudolph RE, et al. Safety of a systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1152–7.
Fuentes-Garcia VE, Morales-Perez E, Ramirez-Mora JC, et al. A randomized trial comparing laryngeal mask airway to endotracheal tube in children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Acta Biomed. 2006;77:90–4.
Acquaviva MA, Horn ND, Gupta SK. Endotracheal Intubation versus laryngeal mask airway for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children. JPGN. 2014; 59:54–56.