A Fork in the Road for Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Blogs and Podcasts: Cross-sectional Study.

FOAM blog critical care disruptive innovation emergency free open-access meducation internet based medical education meducation open educational resource open-access podcast social media web based website

Journal

JMIR medical education
ISSN: 2369-3762
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Educ
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101684518

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 31 05 2022
accepted: 12 10 2022
revised: 02 09 2022
entrez: 28 10 2022
pubmed: 29 10 2022
medline: 29 10 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Free open-access meducation (FOAM) refers to open-access, web-based learning resources in medicine. It includes all formats of digital products, including blogs and podcasts. The number of FOAM blog and podcast sites in emergency medicine and critical care increased dramatically from 2002 to 2013, and physicians began to rely on the availability of these resources. The current landscape of these FOAM sites is unknown. This study aims to (1) estimate the current number of active, open-access blogs and podcasts in emergency medicine and critical care and (2) describe observed and anticipated trends in the FOAM movement using the Theory of Disruptive Innovation by Christensen as a theoretical framework. The authors used multiple resources and sampling strategies to identify active, open-access blogs and podcasts between April 25, 2022, and May 8, 2022, and classified these websites as blogs, podcasts, or blogs+podcasts. For each category, they reported the following outcome measures using descriptive statistics: age, funding, affiliations, and team composition. Based on these findings, the authors projected trends in the number of active sites using a positivist paradigm and the Theory of Disruptive Innovation as a theoretical framework. The authors identified 109 emergency medicine and critical care websites, which comprised 45.9% (n=50) blogs, 22.9% (n=25) podcasts, and 31.2% (n=34) blogs+podcasts. Ages ranged from 0 to 18 years; 27.5% (n=30) sold products, 18.3% (n=20) used advertisements, 44.0% (n=48) had institutional funding, and 27.5% (n=30) had no affiliation or external funding sources. Team sizes ranged from 1 (n=26, 23.9%) to ≥5 (n=60, 55%) individuals. There was a sharp decline in the number of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts in the last decade, dropping 40.4% since 2013. The initial growth of FOAM and its subsequent downturn align with principles in the Theory of Disruptive Innovation by Christensen. These findings have important implications for the field of medical education.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Free open-access meducation (FOAM) refers to open-access, web-based learning resources in medicine. It includes all formats of digital products, including blogs and podcasts. The number of FOAM blog and podcast sites in emergency medicine and critical care increased dramatically from 2002 to 2013, and physicians began to rely on the availability of these resources. The current landscape of these FOAM sites is unknown.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to (1) estimate the current number of active, open-access blogs and podcasts in emergency medicine and critical care and (2) describe observed and anticipated trends in the FOAM movement using the Theory of Disruptive Innovation by Christensen as a theoretical framework.
METHODS METHODS
The authors used multiple resources and sampling strategies to identify active, open-access blogs and podcasts between April 25, 2022, and May 8, 2022, and classified these websites as blogs, podcasts, or blogs+podcasts. For each category, they reported the following outcome measures using descriptive statistics: age, funding, affiliations, and team composition. Based on these findings, the authors projected trends in the number of active sites using a positivist paradigm and the Theory of Disruptive Innovation as a theoretical framework.
RESULTS RESULTS
The authors identified 109 emergency medicine and critical care websites, which comprised 45.9% (n=50) blogs, 22.9% (n=25) podcasts, and 31.2% (n=34) blogs+podcasts. Ages ranged from 0 to 18 years; 27.5% (n=30) sold products, 18.3% (n=20) used advertisements, 44.0% (n=48) had institutional funding, and 27.5% (n=30) had no affiliation or external funding sources. Team sizes ranged from 1 (n=26, 23.9%) to ≥5 (n=60, 55%) individuals.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
There was a sharp decline in the number of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts in the last decade, dropping 40.4% since 2013. The initial growth of FOAM and its subsequent downturn align with principles in the Theory of Disruptive Innovation by Christensen. These findings have important implications for the field of medical education.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36306167
pii: v8i4e39946
doi: 10.2196/39946
pmc: PMC9652734
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e39946

Informations de copyright

©Michelle Lin, Mina Phipps, Yusuf Yilmaz, Christopher J Nash, Michael A Gisondi, Teresa M Chan. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 28.10.2022.

Références

West J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 16;22(1):63-70
pubmed: 33439808
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 May;67(5):649-653.e2
pubmed: 26875062
Med Teach. 2019 Nov;41(11):1252-1262
pubmed: 31287741
Emerg Med J. 2014 Oct;31(e1):e76-7
pubmed: 24554447
Acad Med. 2018 Oct;93(10):1497-1502
pubmed: 29877914
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3185
pubmed: 26278340
AEM Educ Train. 2018 May 30;2(3):221-228
pubmed: 30051092
West J Emerg Med. 2018 May;19(3):600-605
pubmed: 29760862
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 08;21(4):883-891
pubmed: 32726260
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 10;22(1):26-32
pubmed: 33439799
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):242-9
pubmed: 25834664
Acad Med. 2022 Jul 1;97(7):1079-1085
pubmed: 34935729
AEM Educ Train. 2019 May 23;3(4):398-402
pubmed: 31637359
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Oct;13(5):699-710
pubmed: 34721800
Acad Med. 2022 Nov 1;97(11):1691-1698
pubmed: 35612927
ATS Sch. 2020 Jun 3;1(2):87-100
pubmed: 33870273
CJEM. 2021 Sep;23(5):696-699
pubmed: 34264507
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Feb;26(1):76-83
pubmed: 24495067
F1000Res. 2021 Oct 15;10:1048
pubmed: 34987772
Cureus. 2018 Feb 24;10(2):e2223
pubmed: 29696101
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Feb 01;6(1):e10725
pubmed: 35224409
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):142-144
pubmed: 29383071
Acad Med. 2020 Jan;95(1):89-96
pubmed: 31517682
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):690-694
pubmed: 31789841
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Nov 02;3(1):86-91
pubmed: 30680352
Cureus. 2022 Mar 21;14(3):e23361
pubmed: 35475051
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;72(6):696-702
pubmed: 29980461
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):219-25
pubmed: 27168891
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;51(1):12-16
pubmed: 34275668

Auteurs

Michelle Lin (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Mina Phipps (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Yusuf Yilmaz (Y)

Education Research, Innovation, and Theory Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Christopher J Nash (CJ)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Michael A Gisondi (MA)

Precision Education and Assessment Research Lab, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Teresa M Chan (TM)

Education Research, Innovation, and Theory Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH