Retromuscular drain versus no drain in robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.
Abdominal core health quality collaborative
Retromuscular drain
Robotic ventral hernia repair
Journal
Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
ISSN: 1248-9204
Titre abrégé: Hernia
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9715168
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
16
08
2022
accepted:
09
10
2022
medline:
26
4
2023
pubmed:
29
10
2022
entrez:
28
10
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drains may be placed during robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (rVHR) to decrease wound morbidity, but their use is controversial. We aimed to assess the impact of retromuscular drain placement on wound morbidity after robotic rVHR. Patients with and without drains after robotic rVHR in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. Outcomes included surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions (SSOPI) at 30 days. Propensity score matching compared 580 patients with drains to 580 without drains. The groups were well matched with respect to hernia width (drain: 8.0 cm [IQR 6.0; 10.0] vs no drain: 8.0 cm [IQR 5.0; 10.0]; P = 0.399) and transversus abdominis release (drain: 409 (70.5%) vs no drain: 408 (70.3%); P = 0.949). At 30 days, patients with drains had fewer seromas than those without drains (22 (3.8%) vs 88 (15.2%); P < 0.0001). Rates of SSIs and SSOPIs were similar between the two groups at 30 days. Logistic regression analysis showed drain placement lowered the risk of an SSO compared to no drain placement (OR 0.32, CI 0.21-0.47; P < 0.0001). Hospital stay was longer for patients with drains than those without drains (2.0 days [IQR 1.0; 3.0] vs 1.0 day [IQR 1.0; 2.0], respectively; P < .0001). Drain placement during robotic rVHR is associated with decreased postoperative seroma occurrence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Drains may be placed during robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (rVHR) to decrease wound morbidity, but their use is controversial. We aimed to assess the impact of retromuscular drain placement on wound morbidity after robotic rVHR.
METHODS
Patients with and without drains after robotic rVHR in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. Outcomes included surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions (SSOPI) at 30 days.
RESULTS
Propensity score matching compared 580 patients with drains to 580 without drains. The groups were well matched with respect to hernia width (drain: 8.0 cm [IQR 6.0; 10.0] vs no drain: 8.0 cm [IQR 5.0; 10.0]; P = 0.399) and transversus abdominis release (drain: 409 (70.5%) vs no drain: 408 (70.3%); P = 0.949). At 30 days, patients with drains had fewer seromas than those without drains (22 (3.8%) vs 88 (15.2%); P < 0.0001). Rates of SSIs and SSOPIs were similar between the two groups at 30 days. Logistic regression analysis showed drain placement lowered the risk of an SSO compared to no drain placement (OR 0.32, CI 0.21-0.47; P < 0.0001). Hospital stay was longer for patients with drains than those without drains (2.0 days [IQR 1.0; 3.0] vs 1.0 day [IQR 1.0; 2.0], respectively; P < .0001).
CONCLUSION
Drain placement during robotic rVHR is associated with decreased postoperative seroma occurrence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36307620
doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02696-6
pii: 10.1007/s10029-022-02696-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
409-413Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Brucale U, Corcione F, Neola D, Castiglioni S, Cavallaro G, Stabilini C, Botteri E, Sodo M, Imperatore N, Peltrini R (2021) Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hernia 25(6):1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02487-5
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02487-5
Kushner B, Smith E, Han B, Otegbeye E, Holden S, Blatnik J (2021) Early drain removal does not increase the rate of surgical site infections following open transversus abdominis release. Hernia 25:411–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02362-9
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02362-9
pubmed: 33400031
pmcid: 8058248
Nguyen MT, Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Suliburk JW, Leong M, Kao LS, Berger DH, Liang MK (2013) Readmission following open ventral hernia repair: incidence, indications, and predictors. Am J Surg 206(6):942–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.022
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.022
pubmed: 24296099
Stoikes N, Roan E, Webb D, Voeller GR (2018) The problem of seroma after ventral hernia repair. Surg Technol Int 32:93–98
pubmed: 29791714
Kaafarani HMA, Hur K, Hirter A, Kim LT, Thomas A, Berger DH, Reda D, Itani KMG (2009) Seroma in ventral incisional herniorrhaphy: incidence, predictors and outcome. Am J Surg 198:639–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.019
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.019
pubmed: 19887192
Ramshaw B, Dean J, Forman B, Heidel E, Gamenthaler E, Fabian M (2016) Can abdominal wall reconstruction be safely performed without drains? Am Surg 82(8):707–712
doi: 10.1177/000313481608200829
pubmed: 27657586
Gurusamy KS, Allen VB, Samraj K (2012) Wound drains after incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: Chichester, UK.
Plymale MA, Harris JW, Davenport DL, Smith N, Levy S, Roth JS (2016) Abdominal wall reconstruction: the uncertainty of the impact of drain duration upon outcomes. Am Surg 82(3):207–211
doi: 10.1177/000313481608200312
pubmed: 27099055
Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Carbonell AM, Haskins IN, Phillips S, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ (2017) Drain placement does not increase infectious complications after retromuscular ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh: an AHSQC analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 21:2083–2089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3601-0
doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3601-0
pubmed: 28983795
Poulose BK, Roll S, Murphy JW, Matthews BD, Heniford BT, Voeller G, Hope WW, Goldblatt MI, Adrales GL, Rosen MJ (2016) Design and implementation of the Americas hernia society quality collaborative (AHSQC): improving value in hernia care. Hernia 20(2):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1477-7
doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1477-7
pubmed: 26936373
Haskins IN, Horne CM, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Tastaldi L, Perez AJ, Rosenblatt S, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ (2018) A call for standardization of wound events reporting following ventral hernia repair. Hernia 22(5):729–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1748-6
doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1748-6
pubmed: 29429064
Miller BT, Baier KF, Zolin SJ, Huang LC, Phillips S, Petro CC, Beffa LRA, Krpata DM, Rosen MJ, Prabhu AS (2022) Long-term outcomes of seromas after ventral hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02613-x
doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02613-x
pubmed: 36418793