An objective evaluation of simulated surgical outcomes among surgical trainees using manual small-incision cataract surgery virtual reality simulator.
HelpMeSee simulator
MSICS
VR simulator
trainee surgeons
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
entrez:
29
10
2022
pubmed:
30
10
2022
medline:
2
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate trainee performance across six modules of a virtual reality (VR) simulator. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 10 manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) trainees who practiced cataract surgery on an MSICS VR simulator for one month. They were assessed in six major steps which included scleral groove, tunnel dissection, keratome entry, capsulorhexis, nucleus delivery, and intraocular lens (IOL) insertion under a trainer's supervision. The information included in their score metrics was collected, and their overall performance was evaluated. Thirty attempts were evaluated for scleral groove, tunnel dissection, and capsulorhexis and 15 attempts for keratome entry. Candidates had varied results in the dimensional aspects and their rates of complications with a mean satisfactory score of 3.1 ± 4.17, 6.8 ± 5.75, 5.8 ± 7.74, and 1.8 ± 2.57, respectively. Nucleus delivery (n = 5) had more of iris pull and IOL insertion (n = 5) had more of lost IOL as complications but both had a higher satisfactory outcome. A VR simulator is a useful tool for training surgeons before their entry into live surgery. It is an effective method for evaluating objectively the structural characteristics of each phase in MSICS and their associated complications, helping them anticipate it earlier during live surgery by giving them a near real world experience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36308148
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2022_70_11_4018_359577
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1600_22
pmc: PMC9907272
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4018-4025Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Comput Biol Med. 2009 Nov;39(11):1020-31
pubmed: 19720372
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):188-9; author reply 189
pubmed: 22153114
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1111-1130.e1
pubmed: 25864793
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):10945
pubmed: 34040056
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Feb;40(2):212-6
pubmed: 24461498
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;251(3):777-81
pubmed: 23007233
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec;24(6):460-4
pubmed: 19033842
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1616-7
pubmed: 24075164
Ophthalmology. 2014 Mar;121(3):797-801
pubmed: 24268856
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;104(3):324-329
pubmed: 31142463
Ophthalmology. 2004 Apr;111(4):693-8
pubmed: 15051200
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2017 Aug 22;115:T2
pubmed: 29021716
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1734-41
pubmed: 24160383
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;37(10):1756-61
pubmed: 21840683
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):95-8
pubmed: 21924500
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;247(7):955-63
pubmed: 19172289
Simul Healthc. 2018 Feb;13(1):11-15
pubmed: 29023268
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;173:35-41
pubmed: 22356953
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;104(4):588-592
pubmed: 31266774
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;69(2):410-416
pubmed: 33463600
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;19(1):120-2
pubmed: 22346126
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2456-2461
pubmed: 23796766
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Apr;32(4):604-8
pubmed: 16698480