Tertiary lymphoid structures associate with improved survival in early oral tongue cancer.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 05 04 2022
accepted: 20 10 2022
entrez: 30 10 2022
pubmed: 31 10 2022
medline: 2 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The clinical significance of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) is not well-documented in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC). A total of 310 cases of early (cT1-2N0) OTSCC were included in this multicenter study. Assessment of TLSs was conducted on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. TLSs were assessed both in the central part of the tumor and at the invasive front area. The presence of TLSs associated with improved survival of early OTSCC as presented by Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for disease-specific survival (P = 0.01) and overall survival (P = 0.006). In multivariable analyses, which included conventional prognostic factors, the absence of TLSs associated with worse disease-specific survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.96 (95% CI 1.09-3.54; P = 0.025) and poor overall survival (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11-2.48; P = 0.014). Histological evaluation of TLSs predicts survival in early OTSCC. TLSs showed superior prognostic power independent of routine WHO grading and TNM staging system.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The clinical significance of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) is not well-documented in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC).
METHODS METHODS
A total of 310 cases of early (cT1-2N0) OTSCC were included in this multicenter study. Assessment of TLSs was conducted on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. TLSs were assessed both in the central part of the tumor and at the invasive front area.
RESULTS RESULTS
The presence of TLSs associated with improved survival of early OTSCC as presented by Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for disease-specific survival (P = 0.01) and overall survival (P = 0.006). In multivariable analyses, which included conventional prognostic factors, the absence of TLSs associated with worse disease-specific survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.96 (95% CI 1.09-3.54; P = 0.025) and poor overall survival (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11-2.48; P = 0.014).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Histological evaluation of TLSs predicts survival in early OTSCC. TLSs showed superior prognostic power independent of routine WHO grading and TNM staging system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36309667
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10208-z
pii: 10.1186/s12885-022-10208-z
pmc: PMC9618224
doi:

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1108

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Almangush A, Pirinen M, Youssef O, Makitie AA, Leivo I. Risk stratification in oral squamous cell carcinoma using staging of the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2020;42:3002–17.
doi: 10.1002/hed.26344 pubmed: 32548858
Hiam-Galvez KJ, Allen BM, Spitzer MH. Systemic immunity in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21:345–59.
doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00347-z pubmed: 33837297 pmcid: 8034277
Zhang NN, Qu FJ, Liu H, Li ZJ, Zhang YC, Han X, et al. Prognostic impact of tertiary lymphoid structures in breast cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:536.
doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02242-x pubmed: 34654433 pmcid: 8520238
Rakaee M, Kilvaer TK, Jamaly S, Berg T, Paulsen EE, Berglund M, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structure score: a promising approach to refine the TNM staging in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:1680–9.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01307-y pubmed: 33723388 pmcid: 8110789
Qin M, Hamanishi J, Ukita M, Yamanoi K, Takamatsu S, Abiko K, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures are associated with favorable survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(6):1431–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-03093-1 . Epub 2021 Oct 23.
doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03093-1 pubmed: 34689225
Yamakoshi Y, Tanaka H, Sakimura C, Deguchi S, Mori T, Tamura T, et al. Immunological potential of tertiary lymphoid structures surrounding the primary tumor in gastric cancer. Int J Oncol. 2020;57:171–82.
pubmed: 32319601 pmcid: 7252463
Zhang WH, Wang WQ, Han X, Gao HL, Xu SS, Li S, et al. Infiltrating pattern and prognostic value of tertiary lymphoid structures in resected non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e001188.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001188 pubmed: 33055204 pmcid: 7559054
Ahmed A, Halama N. Tertiary lymphoid structures in colorectal cancer liver metastases: association with immunological and clinical parameters and chemotherapy response. Anticancer Res. 2020;40:6367–73.
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14657 pubmed: 33109574
Sautes-Fridman C, Petitprez F, Calderaro J, Fridman WH. Tertiary lymphoid structures in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:307–25.
doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0144-6 pubmed: 31092904
Helmink BA, Reddy SM, Gao J, Zhang S, Basar R, Thakur R, et al. B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response. Nature. 2020;577:549–55.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1922-8 pubmed: 31942075 pmcid: 8762581
Cabrita R, Lauss M, Sanna A, Donia M, Skaarup Larsen M, Mitra S, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures improve immunotherapy and survival in melanoma. Nature. 2020;577:561–5.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1914-8 pubmed: 31942071
Alabi RO, Elmusrati M, Sawazaki-Calone I, Kowalski LP, Haglund C, Coletta RD, et al. Comparison of supervised machine learning classification techniques in prediction of locoregional recurrences in early oral tongue cancer. Int J Med Inform. 2020;136:104068.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104068 pubmed: 31923822
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 pubmed: 21376230
Jones GW, Hill DG, Jones SA. Understanding immune cells in tertiary lymphoid organ development: it is all starting to come together. Front Immunol. 2016;7:401.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00401 pubmed: 27752256 pmcid: 5046062
Liu X, Tsang JYS, Hlaing T, Hu J, Ni YB, Chan SK, et al. Distinct tertiary lymphoid structure associations and their prognostic relevance in HER2 positive and negative breast cancers. Oncologist. 2017;22:1316–24.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0029 pubmed: 28701569 pmcid: 5679825
Li H, Liu H, Fu H, Li J, Xu L, Wang G, et al. Peritumoral Tertiary Lymphoid Structures Correlate With Protective Immunity and Improved Prognosis in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2021;12:648812.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.648812 pubmed: 34122408 pmcid: 8187907
Ruffin AT, Cillo AR, Tabib T, Liu A, Onkar S, Kunning SR, et al. B cell signatures and tertiary lymphoid structures contribute to outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3349.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23355-x pubmed: 34099645 pmcid: 8184766
Di Caro G, Bergomas F, Grizzi F, Doni A, Bianchi P, Malesci A, et al. Occurrence of tertiary lymphoid tissue is associated with T-cell infiltration and predicts better prognosis in early-stage colorectal cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2147–58.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2590 pubmed: 24523438
Fridman WH, Zitvogel L, Sautes-Fridman C, Kroemer G. The immune contexture in cancer prognosis and treatment. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:717–34.
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.101 pubmed: 28741618
Barmpoutis P, Di Capite M, Kayhanian H, Waddingham W, Alexander DC, Jansen M, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) identification and density assessment on H&E-stained digital slides of lung cancer. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0256907.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256907 pubmed: 34555057 pmcid: 8460026
van Rijthoven M, Balkenhol M, Silina K, van der Laak J, Ciompi F. HookNet: Multi-resolution convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation in histopathology whole-slide images. Med Image Anal. 2021;68:101890.
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101890 pubmed: 33260110
Editorial Board. Breast Tumours (WHO Classification of Tumours). 5th ed. World Health Organization-IARC. 2019;2.

Auteurs

Alhadi Almangush (A)

Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3, P.O. Box 21, Helsinki, N00014, Finland. alhadi.almangush@helsinki.fi.
Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. alhadi.almangush@helsinki.fi.
Institute of Biomedicine, Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. alhadi.almangush@helsinki.fi.
Faculty of Dentistry, Misurata University, Misurata, Libya. alhadi.almangush@helsinki.fi.

Ibrahim O Bello (IO)

Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3, P.O. Box 21, Helsinki, N00014, Finland.
Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, King Saud University College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Amr Elseragy (A)

Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Jaana Hagström (J)

Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3, P.O. Box 21, Helsinki, N00014, Finland.
Research Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Oral Pathology and Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Caj Haglund (C)

Research Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Luiz Paulo Kowalski (LP)

Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, and University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, São Paulo, SP, 05402-000, Brazil.

Pentti Nieminen (P)

Medical Informatics and Data Analysis Research Group, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Ricardo D Coletta (RD)

Department of Oral Diagnosis and Graduate Program in Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13414-018, Brazil.

Antti A Mäkitie (AA)

Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Tuula Salo (T)

Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3, P.O. Box 21, Helsinki, N00014, Finland.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Ilmo Leivo (I)

Institute of Biomedicine, Pathology, University of Turku, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH