Factors associated with total coliform and total viable bacterial count in camel milk from Isiolo County, Kenya.

camels coliform counts milk pastoralists total bacterial count

Journal

Veterinary world
ISSN: 0972-8988
Titre abrégé: Vet World
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101504872

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 02 03 2022
accepted: 20 06 2022
entrez: 31 10 2022
pubmed: 1 11 2022
medline: 1 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Camels have adaptive features to harsh climatic conditions, which make them a valued stable source of livelihood in arid lands. This study estimated the total bacterial and coliform counts (CCs), their associated factors in raw camel milk from the pastoral camel keepers, and the entire milk value chain in Isiolo County and Nairobi, Kenya. This study elucidates the bacterial load in camel milk and its potential risk. Moreover, this study provides recommendations on how to avert a human health hazard. This cross-sectional study targeted the camel pastoralists in Isiolo County, in the northern central part of Kenya. The study was conducted in July and August 2021. In addition, camel milk samples were collected along the value chain key points, including the producers, transporters, one bulker, and small traders in Isiolo town, and other retailers in Nairobi City. Eight camel herds were purposively selected and visited for a sample collection from pooled milking containers (10 mL each). In addition, milk was collected from pooled milk through the transporters, two milk bulkers, and several milk retailers in Isiolo town. Milk was further collected from retailers in Eastleigh town, Nairobi City. At each sampling point, 20 mL of milk sample was collected aseptically. The milk samples were assessed for total viable bacterial counts (TVBC) and CCs using the plate count and digital colony count, respectively. A total of 76 respondents were selected and 213 milk samples were collected in this study. The respondents included the 1 (1.3%) bulker, 32 (42.1%) producers, 26 (34.2%) traders, and 17 (22.4%) transporters. Most respondents were male (62%), with most being over 40 years old. Overall, the TVBC had a mean of 2436835 ± 9276636 and a median of 3600. Furthermore, the multivariable multilevel mixed-effects linear regression model indicated that gender and practice of smoking milk-handling containers were positively and negatively associated with high counts of the natural logarithm of total viable bacteria, respectively. Of the milk samples evaluated for the CC, 10.3% (22/213) had counts greater than or equal to (≥) 100,000, where some also indicated extreme outliers of about 9.3 million. This study reports a low proportion of camel milk samples with high total viable bacterial and CCs. The material of the milk container and level of education interactively affected the total viable bacteria.

Sections du résumé

Background and Aim UNASSIGNED
Camels have adaptive features to harsh climatic conditions, which make them a valued stable source of livelihood in arid lands. This study estimated the total bacterial and coliform counts (CCs), their associated factors in raw camel milk from the pastoral camel keepers, and the entire milk value chain in Isiolo County and Nairobi, Kenya. This study elucidates the bacterial load in camel milk and its potential risk. Moreover, this study provides recommendations on how to avert a human health hazard.
Materials and Methods UNASSIGNED
This cross-sectional study targeted the camel pastoralists in Isiolo County, in the northern central part of Kenya. The study was conducted in July and August 2021. In addition, camel milk samples were collected along the value chain key points, including the producers, transporters, one bulker, and small traders in Isiolo town, and other retailers in Nairobi City. Eight camel herds were purposively selected and visited for a sample collection from pooled milking containers (10 mL each). In addition, milk was collected from pooled milk through the transporters, two milk bulkers, and several milk retailers in Isiolo town. Milk was further collected from retailers in Eastleigh town, Nairobi City. At each sampling point, 20 mL of milk sample was collected aseptically. The milk samples were assessed for total viable bacterial counts (TVBC) and CCs using the plate count and digital colony count, respectively.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 76 respondents were selected and 213 milk samples were collected in this study. The respondents included the 1 (1.3%) bulker, 32 (42.1%) producers, 26 (34.2%) traders, and 17 (22.4%) transporters. Most respondents were male (62%), with most being over 40 years old. Overall, the TVBC had a mean of 2436835 ± 9276636 and a median of 3600. Furthermore, the multivariable multilevel mixed-effects linear regression model indicated that gender and practice of smoking milk-handling containers were positively and negatively associated with high counts of the natural logarithm of total viable bacteria, respectively. Of the milk samples evaluated for the CC, 10.3% (22/213) had counts greater than or equal to (≥) 100,000, where some also indicated extreme outliers of about 9.3 million.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
This study reports a low proportion of camel milk samples with high total viable bacterial and CCs. The material of the milk container and level of education interactively affected the total viable bacteria.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36313840
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1954-1960
pii: Vetworld-15-1954
pmc: PMC9615505
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1954-1960

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © Gitau, et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4294-301
pubmed: 25958278
Zoonoses Public Health. 2012 Mar;59(2):118-25
pubmed: 21824377
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Jan;84(1):292-8
pubmed: 11210044
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2009 Sep;6(7):793-806
pubmed: 19737059
Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2016;44(6):701-713
pubmed: 28018023
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Oct;84(10):2157-62
pubmed: 11699446

Auteurs

George Karuoya Gitau (GK)

Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625 Nairobi, Kenya.

Peter Kimeli (P)

Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625 Nairobi, Kenya.

Davis Ikiror (D)

Vétérinaires Sans Frontières Suisse, Muthangari Road, off Gitanga Road, P.O. Box 25656-00603, Nairobi, Kenya.

Willy Mwangi (W)

Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625 Nairobi, Kenya.

Douglas Machuchu (D)

Vétérinaires Sans Frontières Suisse, Muthangari Road, off Gitanga Road, P.O. Box 25656-00603, Nairobi, Kenya.

Moses Irungu Gakuru (MI)

Department of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625 Nairobi, Kenya.

Genevieve Owuor (G)

Vétérinaires Sans Frontières Suisse, Muthangari Road, off Gitanga Road, P.O. Box 25656-00603, Nairobi, Kenya.

Classifications MeSH