Characterizing Determinants of Near-Road Ambient Air Quality for an Urban Intersection and a Freeway Site.
Journal
Research report (Health Effects Institute)
ISSN: 1041-5505
Titre abrégé: Res Rep Health Eff Inst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8812230
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
entrez:
31
10
2022
pubmed:
1
11
2022
medline:
2
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Near-road ambient air pollution concentrations that are affected by vehicle emissions are typically characterized by substantial spatial variability with respect to distance from the roadway and temporal variability based on the time of day, day of week, and season. The goal of this work is to identify variables that explain either temporal or spatial variability based on case studies for a freeway site and an urban intersection site. The key hypothesis is that dispersion modeling of near-road pollutant concentrations could be improved by adding estimates or indices for site-specific explanatory variables, particularly related to traffic. Based on case studies for a freeway site and an urban intersection site, the specific aims of this project are to (1) develop and test regression models that explain variability in traffic-related air pollutant (TRAP) ambient concentration at two near-roadway locations; (2) develop and test refined proxies for land use, traffic, emissions and dispersion; and (3) prioritize inputs according to their ability to explain variability in ambient concentrations to help focus efforts for future data collection and model development. The key pollutants that are the key focus of this work include nitrogen oxides (NO The methodological approach includes case studies for which variables are identified and assesses their ability to explain either temporal or spatial variability in pollutant ambient concentrations. The case studies include one freeway location and one urban intersection. The case studies address (1) temporal variability at a fixed monitor 10 meters from a freeway; (2) downwind concentrations perpendicular to the same location; (3) variability in 24-hour average pollutant concentrations at five sites near an urban intersection; and (4) spatiotemporal variability along a walking path near that same intersection. The study boundary encompasses key factors in the continuum from vehicle emissions to near-road exposure concentrations. These factors include land use, transportation infrastructure and traffic control, vehicle mix, vehicle (traffic) flow, on-road emissions, meteorology, transport and evolution (transformation) of primary emissions, and production of secondary pollutants, and their resulting impact on measured concentrations in the near-road environment. We conducted field measurements of land use, traffic, vehicle emissions, and near-road ambient concentrations in the vicinity of two newly installed fixed-site monitors. One is a monitoring station jointly operated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) on I-40 between Airport Boulevard and I-540 in Wake County, North Carolina. The other is a fixed-site monitor for measuring PM We quantified land use metrics at each site, such as distances to the nearest bus stop. For the freeway site, we quantified lane-by-lane total vehicle count, heavy vehicle (HV) count, and several vehicle-activity indices that account for distance from each lane to the roadside monitor. For the urban site, we quantified vehicle counts for all 12 turning movements through the intersection. At each site, we measured microscale vehicle tailpipe emissions using a portable emission measurement system. At the freeway site, we measured the spatial gradient of NO At the urban site, we measured daily average concentrations of nitric oxide (NO), NO Statistical models were developed for each site for selected pollutants. With variables for local wind direction, heavy-vehicle index, temperature, and day type, the multiple coefficient of determination (R Among the set of candidate explanatory variables, typically only a few were needed to explain most of the variability in observed ambient concentrations. At the freeway site, the concentration gradients perpendicular to the road were influenced by dilution, season, time of day, and whether the pollutant underwent chemical or physical transformations. The explanatory variables that were useful in explaining temporal variability in measured ambient concentrations, as well as spatial variability at the urban site, were typically localized real-time traffic-volume indices and local wind direction. However, the specific set of useful explanatory variables was site, context (e.g., next to road, quadrants around an intersection, pedestrian transects), and pollutant specific. Among the most novel of the indicators, variability in real-time measured tailpipe exhaust emissions was found to help explain variability in pedestrian transect UFP concentrations. UFP particle counts were very sensitive to real-time traffic indicators at both the freeway and urban sites. Localized site-specific data on traffic and meteorology contributed to explaining variability in ambient concentrations. HV traffic influenced near-road air quality at the freeway site more so than at the urban site. The statistical models typically explained most of the observed variability but were relatively simple. The results here are site-specific and not generalizable, but they are illustrative that near-road air quality can be highly sensitive to localized real-time indicators of traffic and meteorology.
Substances chimiques
Vehicle Emissions
0
Air Pollutants
0
Particulate Matter
0
Soot
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-73Informations de copyright
© 2022 Health Effects Institute. All rights reserved.
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 27;11(9):8777-93
pubmed: 25166917
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):49-64
pubmed: 20502493
Atmos Environ (1994). 2018 Jun;182:213-224
pubmed: 33897264
Atmos Environ (1994). 2017;155:137-10
pubmed: 31632181
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Sep 15;407(19):5247-56
pubmed: 19596394
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Feb 7;51(3):1074-1093
pubmed: 28000440
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011 Oct;61(10):1046-56
pubmed: 22070037
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Apr 15;450-451:307-16
pubmed: 23500830
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Jun;63(6):724-36
pubmed: 23858998
Environ Int. 2017 Feb;99:151-160
pubmed: 28043651
Atmos Chem Phys. 2010;10(2):5599-5626
pubmed: 22427751
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010 Mar;60(3):328-36
pubmed: 20397562
Environ Pollut. 2018 Feb;233:235-245
pubmed: 29096296
Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Jan 1;40(1):155-62
pubmed: 16433346
Atmos Chem Phys. 2013 Jan 11;13(1):
pubmed: 24244208
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jun 6;51(11):6542-6552
pubmed: 28441489
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Dec 09;11(12):12739-66
pubmed: 25501000
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2016 Nov;65(5):731-753
pubmed: 27789915
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 20;49(20):12525-34
pubmed: 26401623
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Apr 1;42(7):2483-9
pubmed: 18504985
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2017 Jan;66(1):3-28
pubmed: 28239196
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 5;50(7):3695-705
pubmed: 26923334
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2223-30
pubmed: 17438767
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Mar 1;42(5):1651-6
pubmed: 18441816
Atmos Environ (1994). 2015 Apr;107:351-363
pubmed: 25844042
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 22;7:89
pubmed: 17519039
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008 Jul;58(7):865-78
pubmed: 18672711
Environ Pollut. 2017 Feb;221:130-140
pubmed: 27914859
Environ Res. 2016 Apr;146:65-72
pubmed: 26720396
Air Qual Atmos Health. 2017 Jun;10(5):611-625
pubmed: 30245748
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):450-462
pubmed: 29064065
Science. 2007 Mar 2;315(5816):1259-62
pubmed: 17332409
Atmos Environ (1994). 2012 Dec;63:250-260
pubmed: 24415904
Environ Pollut. 1998;99(3):347-60
pubmed: 15093299
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;11(6):470-89
pubmed: 11791164
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Aug;53(8):992-1002
pubmed: 12943319
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 15;538:905-21
pubmed: 26363146
Environmetrics. 2015 Nov;26(7):477-487
pubmed: 27547047
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015 Aug;218(6):535-42
pubmed: 26013401
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):135-47
pubmed: 22252279
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2422-8
pubmed: 17438795
Stat Biosci. 2017;9(2):559-581
pubmed: 29225714
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;22(5):483-8
pubmed: 22669499
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Sep 15;11(9):9553-77
pubmed: 25226412
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Sep;65(9):1062-71
pubmed: 26067547
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Apr 15;584-585:849-855
pubmed: 28148457
Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Apr 15;40(8):2531-6
pubmed: 16683588
Toxicol Sci. 2014 Jul;140(1):61-72
pubmed: 24718702
Air Qual Atmos Health. 2018;11(2):239-244
pubmed: 29568338
Environ Int. 2016 Mar;88:44-52
pubmed: 26708280
Environ Int. 2014 May;66:1-10
pubmed: 24503484
Atmos Environ (1994). 2009 Mar 1;43(9):1641-1649
pubmed: 20041038
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Nov 1;438:389-403
pubmed: 23022723
Environ Int. 2018 Feb;111:144-151
pubmed: 29207286
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jan 3;51(1):384-392
pubmed: 27966909
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jul 21;54(14):8968-8979
pubmed: 32584562
Environ Pollut. 2017 Sep;228:201-210
pubmed: 28544997
Sci Total Environ. 2016 May 15;553:474-485
pubmed: 26938315
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Mar 1;419:7-15
pubmed: 22281040
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 May 1;44(9):3594-600
pubmed: 20377172
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 5;55(1):100-108
pubmed: 33284612
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 15;44(14):5334-44
pubmed: 20560612
Atmos Environ (1994). 2014 Dec 1;99:309-321
pubmed: 25364295
Environ Res. 2016 May;147:193-206
pubmed: 26894815
Environ Int. 2014 Dec;73:372-81
pubmed: 25233101
Environ Int. 2017 Oct;107:154-162
pubmed: 28735152
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Feb 21;46(4):2234-41
pubmed: 22185611
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Nov 7;51(21):12473-12480
pubmed: 28948787
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2002 Sep;52(9):1032-42
pubmed: 12269664
Environ Int. 2018 May;114:167-180
pubmed: 29514111
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 01;12(4):3646-66
pubmed: 25837345
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2018 Jun;68(6):514-563
pubmed: 29589998
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2403-2410
pubmed: 30292996
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Feb;54(2):130-40
pubmed: 14977314
Environ Health. 2020 Jan 21;19(1):8
pubmed: 31964412
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 May 19;49(10):6085-92
pubmed: 25905923
Environ Health. 2010 Jun 25;9:29
pubmed: 20579353