Qualitative Examination of the Role and Influence of Mothers-in-Law on Young Married Couples' Family Planning in Rural Maharashtra, India.
Journal
Global health, science and practice
ISSN: 2169-575X
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Sci Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101624414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 10 2022
31 10 2022
Historique:
received:
22
02
2022
accepted:
23
08
2022
entrez:
31
10
2022
pubmed:
1
11
2022
medline:
3
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Unmet need for family planning (FP) continues to be high in India, especially among young and newly married women. Mothers-in-law (MILs) often exert pressure on couples for fertility and control decision making and behaviors around fertility and FP, yet there is a paucity of literature to understand their perspectives. Ten focus group discussions (FGDs) were carried out with MILs of young married women (aged 18-29 years) participating in a couple-focused FP intervention as a part of a cluster-randomized intervention evaluation trial (the CHARM2 study) in rural Maharashtra, India. FGDs included questions on their roles, attitudes, and decision making around fertility and FP. Audio-recorded data were translated/transcribed into English and analyzed for key themes using a deductive coding method. MILs reported having social norms of early fertility and son preference. They understood that family size norms are lower among daughters-in-law and that spacing can be beneficial but were not supportive of short-term contraceptives, especially before the first child. They preferred female sterilization, opposed abortion, had apprehensions around side effects from contraceptive use, and had misconceptions about the intrauterine device, with particular concerns around its coercive insertion. MILs mostly believed that decision making should be done jointly by a husband and wife, but that as elders, they should be consulted and involved in the decision-making process. These findings highlight the need for engagement of MILs for FP promotion in rural India and the potential utility of social norms interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36316150
pii: GHSP-D-22-00050
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00050
pmc: PMC9622279
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD084453
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD001259
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Dixit et al.
Références
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Nov 20;9:100484
pubmed: 31998826
Contraception. 2010 Jun;81(6):457-9
pubmed: 20472110
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 25;16(1):88
pubmed: 31238954
Stud Fam Plann. 2017 Dec;48(4):377-389
pubmed: 29165824
Reprod Health. 2021 Mar 9;18(1):60
pubmed: 33750403
World Med Health Policy. 2016 Dec;8(4):382-408
pubmed: 28503353
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):865
pubmed: 32503485
Reprod Health Matters. 2010 May;18(35):154-62
pubmed: 20541094
Reprod Health. 2016 Feb 20;13:14
pubmed: 26897656
J Biosoc Sci. 2003 Oct;35(4):545-58
pubmed: 14621251
Reprod Health Matters. 2006 Nov;14(28):144-55
pubmed: 17101433
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 10;6:90-101
pubmed: 30547108
Eur J Popul. 2016;32(5):629-660
pubmed: 27980351
Reprod Health. 2015 Jan 12;12:4
pubmed: 25582429
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 May 03;22:100359
pubmed: 32382722
Asian J Res Soc Sci Humanit. 2015;5(6):18-33
pubmed: 29430437
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 13;15(1):63
pubmed: 29653571
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jan;20(1):149-157
pubmed: 26440937
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):122-8
pubmed: 24331859
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 13;15(4):e0231392
pubmed: 32282817
Cult Health Sex. 2022 Apr 24;:1-16
pubmed: 35465833
Reprod Health. 2016 Sep 08;13:109
pubmed: 27608805
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):96
pubmed: 32552745
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Aug;15(6):700-12
pubmed: 20680670
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 18;21:100318
pubmed: 32322807
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;64(4S):S4-S6
pubmed: 30914167
J Biosoc Sci. 2006 Mar;38(2):203-20
pubmed: 16490154