Retinal layer segmentation in a cohort of healthy children via optical coherence tomography.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
26
03
2022
accepted:
18
10
2022
entrez:
3
11
2022
pubmed:
4
11
2022
medline:
8
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows the detection of macular pathology and involvement of the optic nerve in a wide spectrum of diseases. For the differentiation of diseased and healthy status, normal values of retinal layer segmentation are critical. Yet, normative values mostly cover adult populations with only sparse data for paediatric cohorts. We present data of retinal layer characteristics via OCT in a healthy paediatric cohort. This prospective cross-sectional study screened 75 healthy children (male = 42, female = 33, range 4-17 years) without visual problems. OCT was performed with a peripapillary ring and macula scan protocol to determine paediatric normative values for routine parameters (peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (pRNFL), total macular volume (TMV), macular retinal thickness (RT)). The macula scan (6mm grid) was segmented using the device-inherent automated segmentation software (Heidelberg Eye Explorer) for retinal layers: RNFL, ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL) in 9 segments each and mean of the 9 segments. We obtained OCT data of 72 children with mean age 12.49 years (standard deviation, SD, 2.18; minimum 3.93). Mean global pRNFL was 102.20 μm (SD 8.24), mean TMV 8.81 mm3 (0.30) and mean RT (all segments) 318.22 μm (10.19). Segmented macular retinal layer thicknesses (mean of all segments) were: RNFL 27.67 μm (2.14), GCL 41.94 μm (2.50), IPL 34.97 μm (2.10), INL 35.18 μm (2.15), OPL 29.06 μm (2.24), ONL 68.35 μm (6.20). The OCT is a useful non-invasive imaging technique for the examination of the retina in children with short duration, high imaging resolution and no known adverse effects. Normative values may serve as a comparator for different neuropaediatric disorders and are first presented with this study using an up-to-date and standardized OCT imaging technique.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
High-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows the detection of macular pathology and involvement of the optic nerve in a wide spectrum of diseases. For the differentiation of diseased and healthy status, normal values of retinal layer segmentation are critical. Yet, normative values mostly cover adult populations with only sparse data for paediatric cohorts. We present data of retinal layer characteristics via OCT in a healthy paediatric cohort.
METHODS
This prospective cross-sectional study screened 75 healthy children (male = 42, female = 33, range 4-17 years) without visual problems. OCT was performed with a peripapillary ring and macula scan protocol to determine paediatric normative values for routine parameters (peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (pRNFL), total macular volume (TMV), macular retinal thickness (RT)). The macula scan (6mm grid) was segmented using the device-inherent automated segmentation software (Heidelberg Eye Explorer) for retinal layers: RNFL, ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL) in 9 segments each and mean of the 9 segments.
RESULTS
We obtained OCT data of 72 children with mean age 12.49 years (standard deviation, SD, 2.18; minimum 3.93). Mean global pRNFL was 102.20 μm (SD 8.24), mean TMV 8.81 mm3 (0.30) and mean RT (all segments) 318.22 μm (10.19). Segmented macular retinal layer thicknesses (mean of all segments) were: RNFL 27.67 μm (2.14), GCL 41.94 μm (2.50), IPL 34.97 μm (2.10), INL 35.18 μm (2.15), OPL 29.06 μm (2.24), ONL 68.35 μm (6.20).
CONCLUSION
The OCT is a useful non-invasive imaging technique for the examination of the retina in children with short duration, high imaging resolution and no known adverse effects. Normative values may serve as a comparator for different neuropaediatric disorders and are first presented with this study using an up-to-date and standardized OCT imaging technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36327296
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276958
pii: PONE-D-22-08997
pmc: PMC9632928
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0276958Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
RG has received speaker and board honoraria from Baxter, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Bristol Meyer Squibb, CSL Behring, Eisai, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Stendhal, Talecris and TEVA. His department has received grant support from Bayer Schering, BiogenIdec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and TEVA. All of RG’s declarations are unrelated to the content of this manuscript. AS has received speaker honoraria and/or travel compensation for activities with Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Roche, and research support by the Swiss MS Society and Baasch Medicus Foundation, not related to this manuscript. AKR, MA, JR, TF, DB, KWU, TL, RG, AS have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Références
Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):786-91
pubmed: 16650674
Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1583-92
pubmed: 16949443
Neurology. 2020 Jan 21;94(3):e323-e329
pubmed: 31848256
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;87(7):899-901
pubmed: 12812895
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;62(4):412-8
pubmed: 24817744
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;153(3):552-559.e1
pubmed: 22019223
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1046-52
pubmed: 17210181
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Dec 17;54(13):8104-11
pubmed: 24150754
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(12):e699
pubmed: 25816043
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147448
pubmed: 26808961
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 22;14:53
pubmed: 24755354
Eye (Lond). 2012 Dec;26(12):1563-70
pubmed: 23079750
Eye (Lond). 2021 Mar;35(3):714-738
pubmed: 32929184
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;155(2):354-360.e1
pubmed: 23127751
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Nov 1;60(14):4792-4802
pubmed: 31743936
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan;155(1):171-176.e1
pubmed: 22967864
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;127(1):50-8
pubmed: 19139338
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;148(2):266-71
pubmed: 19427616
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 13;8(1):10605
pubmed: 30006534
Semin Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;28(2):97-102
pubmed: 23448566
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:219-23
pubmed: 22347793
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):151-8
pubmed: 19878103
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;139(3):509-17
pubmed: 15767062
J Glaucoma. 2010 Sep;19(7):475-82
pubmed: 20051888
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;91(1):e56-63
pubmed: 23347665
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0180450
pubmed: 28678834
Eye (Lond). 2009 Nov;23(11):2071-8
pubmed: 19079147
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):5285-5291
pubmed: 30383200