PFAS levels and determinants of variability in exposure in European teenagers - Results from the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021).
Adolescents
Determinants
Exposure
Food consumption
HBM4EU
Perfluoroalkyl substances
Journal
International journal of hygiene and environmental health
ISSN: 1618-131X
Titre abrégé: Int J Hyg Environ Health
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100898843
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
08
07
2022
revised:
14
09
2022
accepted:
21
10
2022
pubmed:
4
11
2022
medline:
7
12
2022
entrez:
3
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are man-made fluorinated chemicals, widely used in various types of consumer products, resulting in their omnipresence in human populations. The aim of this study was to describe current PFAS levels in European teenagers and to investigate the determinants of serum/plasma concentrations in this specific age group. PFAS concentrations were determined in serum or plasma samples from 1957 teenagers (12-18 years) from 9 European countries as part of the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021). Questionnaire data were post-harmonized by each study and quality checked centrally. Only PFAS with an overall quantification frequency of at least 60% (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS and PFNA) were included in the analyses. Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were analysed together with food consumption frequencies to identify determinants of PFAS exposure. The variables study, sex and the highest educational level of household were included as fixed factors in the multivariable linear regression models for all PFAS and each dietary variable was added to the fixed model one by one and for each PFAS separately. The European exposure values for PFAS were reported as geometric means with 95% confidence intervals (CI): PFOS [2.13 μg/L (1.63-2.78)], PFOA ([0.97 μg/L (0.75-1.26)]), PFNA [0.30 μg/L (0.19-0.45)] and PFHxS [0.41 μg/L (0.33-0.52)]. The estimated geometric mean exposure levels were significantly higher in the North and West versus the South and East of Europe. Boys had significantly higher concentrations of the four PFAS compared to girls and significantly higher PFASs concentrations were found in teenagers from households with a higher education level. Consumption of seafood and fish at least 2 times per week was significantly associated with 21% (95% CI: 12-31%) increase in PFOS concentrations and 20% (95% CI: 10-31%) increase in PFNA concentrations as compared to less frequent consumption of seafood and fish. The same trend was observed for PFOA and PFHxS but not statistically significant. Consumption of eggs at least 2 times per week was associated with 11% (95% CI: 2-22%) and 14% (95% CI: 2-27%) increase in PFOS and PFNA concentrations, respectively, as compared to less frequent consumption of eggs. Significantly higher PFOS concentrations were observed for participants consuming offal (14% (95% CI: 3-26%)), the same trend was observed for the other PFAS but not statistically significant. Local food consumption at least 2 times per week was associated with 40% (95% CI: 19-64%) increase in PFOS levels as compared to those consuming local food less frequently. This work provides information about current levels of PFAS in European teenagers and potential dietary sources of exposure to PFAS in European teenagers. These results can be of use for targeted monitoring of PFAS in food.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are man-made fluorinated chemicals, widely used in various types of consumer products, resulting in their omnipresence in human populations. The aim of this study was to describe current PFAS levels in European teenagers and to investigate the determinants of serum/plasma concentrations in this specific age group.
METHODS
PFAS concentrations were determined in serum or plasma samples from 1957 teenagers (12-18 years) from 9 European countries as part of the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021). Questionnaire data were post-harmonized by each study and quality checked centrally. Only PFAS with an overall quantification frequency of at least 60% (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS and PFNA) were included in the analyses. Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were analysed together with food consumption frequencies to identify determinants of PFAS exposure. The variables study, sex and the highest educational level of household were included as fixed factors in the multivariable linear regression models for all PFAS and each dietary variable was added to the fixed model one by one and for each PFAS separately.
RESULTS
The European exposure values for PFAS were reported as geometric means with 95% confidence intervals (CI): PFOS [2.13 μg/L (1.63-2.78)], PFOA ([0.97 μg/L (0.75-1.26)]), PFNA [0.30 μg/L (0.19-0.45)] and PFHxS [0.41 μg/L (0.33-0.52)]. The estimated geometric mean exposure levels were significantly higher in the North and West versus the South and East of Europe. Boys had significantly higher concentrations of the four PFAS compared to girls and significantly higher PFASs concentrations were found in teenagers from households with a higher education level. Consumption of seafood and fish at least 2 times per week was significantly associated with 21% (95% CI: 12-31%) increase in PFOS concentrations and 20% (95% CI: 10-31%) increase in PFNA concentrations as compared to less frequent consumption of seafood and fish. The same trend was observed for PFOA and PFHxS but not statistically significant. Consumption of eggs at least 2 times per week was associated with 11% (95% CI: 2-22%) and 14% (95% CI: 2-27%) increase in PFOS and PFNA concentrations, respectively, as compared to less frequent consumption of eggs. Significantly higher PFOS concentrations were observed for participants consuming offal (14% (95% CI: 3-26%)), the same trend was observed for the other PFAS but not statistically significant. Local food consumption at least 2 times per week was associated with 40% (95% CI: 19-64%) increase in PFOS levels as compared to those consuming local food less frequently.
CONCLUSION
This work provides information about current levels of PFAS in European teenagers and potential dietary sources of exposure to PFAS in European teenagers. These results can be of use for targeted monitoring of PFAS in food.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36327670
pii: S1438-4639(22)00140-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114057
pmc: PMC9758614
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorocarbons
0
Alkanesulfonic Acids
0
Environmental Pollutants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
114057Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.
Références
Chemosphere. 2020 Mar;242:125250
pubmed: 31896205
EFSA J. 2020 Sep 17;18(9):e06223
pubmed: 32994824
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Dec;112(17):1691-6
pubmed: 15579415
Environ Res. 2019 Feb;169:114-121
pubmed: 30447498
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 May;234:113740
pubmed: 33774419
Environ Int. 2014 Aug;69:58-66
pubmed: 24815340
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110740
pubmed: 33460636
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Aug;237:113809
pubmed: 34455198
Environ Int. 2010 Oct;36(7):772-8
pubmed: 20579735
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 1;733:139186
pubmed: 32474294
Environ Int. 2021 Feb;147:106340
pubmed: 33422968
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 6;49(19):11849-58
pubmed: 26333069
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jun 15;412:125159
pubmed: 33951855
Food Nutr Res. 2018 Aug 28;62:
pubmed: 30186087
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Feb;20(2):1193-202
pubmed: 23184128
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016 Nov;219(8):867-875
pubmed: 27451073
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Aug;237:113821
pubmed: 34375847
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 01;19(11):
pubmed: 35682369
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Mar;220(2 Pt A):152-166
pubmed: 27914867
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 20;52(6):3738-3747
pubmed: 29516726
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015 Jul;218(5):437-43
pubmed: 25921520
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 07;18(24):
pubmed: 34948492
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Aug 19;48(16):9600-8
pubmed: 25026485
Chemosphere. 2017 Mar;171:617-624
pubmed: 28056448
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022 May;242:113972
pubmed: 35453051
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Mar;220(2 Pt A):94-97
pubmed: 28284775
Environ Int. 2015 Nov;84:71-81
pubmed: 26232143
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Nov;115(11):1596-602
pubmed: 18007991
Environ Int. 2011 Oct;37(7):1206-12
pubmed: 21620474
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 15;847:157481
pubmed: 35868372
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):382-8
pubmed: 27063603
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:357-65
pubmed: 27132161
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Mar;220(2 Pt A):36-45
pubmed: 28160993
Environ Res. 2007 Feb;103(2):176-84
pubmed: 16893538
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209255
pubmed: 30596681
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2014 Jan;217(1):52-61
pubmed: 23601780
Environ Int. 2018 Oct;119:165-173
pubmed: 29958117
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 2):1304-1310
pubmed: 30420127
Chemosphere. 2015 Jun;129:203-9
pubmed: 25147004
Environ Int. 2020 Oct;143:105985
pubmed: 32731096
Environ Pollut. 2022 Aug 15;307:119478
pubmed: 35588958