Evaluating the impact of pop-off mechanisms in boys with posterior urethral valves.
VURD
bladder diverticula
pop-off mechanism
posterior urethral valves
renal function
urinoma
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
08
08
2022
accepted:
20
09
2022
entrez:
4
11
2022
pubmed:
5
11
2022
medline:
5
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Posterior urethral valves are urethral leaflets that cause Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (LUTO) in boys and are associated with congenital renal dysplasia and abnormal bladder function. They affect 1:4,000 to 1:25,000 births and can be responsible for End-Stage Renal Failure in childhood. There have been several studies on the effect of pop-off mechanisms in boys with posterior urethral valves, but results are contradictory. We aimed to assess and discuss the effect of pop-off mechanisms on renal function in a large cohort of patients. Boys with PUV with and without pop-off mechanisms (urinoma, VURD or giant bladder diverticula) were divided into three severity groups for renal function according to their nadir creatinine (low-risk NC < 35 μmol/L, intermediate-risk NC between 35 and 75 μmol/L, and high-risk NC > 75 μmol/L). We compared children with and children without pop-off mechanisms for mean renal function as well as patient distribution within each severity group. We included 137 boys of which 39 had a pop-off mechanism. Patients had complete data for at least 5 years follow-up. Though there was no significant statistical difference in mean renal function between the pop-off and non-pop-off group, patient distribution within each severity group varied according to whether patients had a pop-off mechanism or not. Though there was no significant difference in mean renal function between boys with and without pop-off mechanisms, it is possible that these are two different patient populations and direct comparison is not possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36330367
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1014422
pmc: PMC9622767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1014422Informations de copyright
© 2022 Delefortrie, Ferdynus, Paye-Jaouen, Michel, Dobremez, Peycelon, El Ghoneimi and Harper.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Pediatr Urol. 2010 Apr;6(2):143-7
pubmed: 19679514
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 May;15(3):241.e1-241.e7
pubmed: 30982696
J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1433-5; discussion 1435
pubmed: 16145457
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5 Suppl):1523-6
pubmed: 24679861
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Aug;16(4):488.e1-488.e8
pubmed: 32605875
J Urol. 1982 Nov;128(5):994-7
pubmed: 7176067
Pediatr Radiol. 1990;20(7):543-5
pubmed: 2216590
J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Oct;7(5):538-42
pubmed: 20829118
J Urol. 1983 Oct;130(4):733-8
pubmed: 6684182
J Urol. 1997 Sep;158(3 Pt 2):1004-7
pubmed: 9258130
J Urol. 1988 Nov;140(5):993-6
pubmed: 3139895
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Dec;11(6):356.e1-5
pubmed: 26292912
J Urol. 1995 Aug;154(2 Pt 2):708-11
pubmed: 7609159