Adjustment disorder in the Armed Forces: a systematic review.


Journal

Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0567
Titre abrégé: J Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9212352

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 13 9 2023
pubmed: 5 11 2022
entrez: 4 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the UK military, adjustment disorder (AjD) is reported as one of the most diagnosed mental disorders, alongside depression, in personnel presenting to mental health services. Despite this, little is understood about what may predict AjD, common treatment or outcomes for this population. The systematic review aimed to summarise existing research for AjD in Armed Forces (AF) populations, including prevalence and risk factors, and to outline clinical and occupational outcomes. A literature search was conducted in December 2020 to identify research that investigated AjD within an AF population (serving or veteran) following the PRISMA guidelines. Eighty-three studies were included in the review. The AjD prevalence estimates in AF populations with a mental disorder was considerably higher for serving AF personnel (34.9%) compared to veterans (12.8%). Childhood adversities were identified as a risk factor for AjD. AjD was found to increase the risk of suicidal ideation, with one study reporting a risk ratio of 4.70 (95% Confidence Interval: 3.50-6.20). Talking therapies were the most common treatment for AjD, however none reported on treatment effectiveness. This review found that AjD was commonly reported across international AF. Despite heterogeneity in the results, the review identifies several literature gaps.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
In the UK military, adjustment disorder (AjD) is reported as one of the most diagnosed mental disorders, alongside depression, in personnel presenting to mental health services. Despite this, little is understood about what may predict AjD, common treatment or outcomes for this population.
AIM UNASSIGNED
The systematic review aimed to summarise existing research for AjD in Armed Forces (AF) populations, including prevalence and risk factors, and to outline clinical and occupational outcomes.
METHOD UNASSIGNED
A literature search was conducted in December 2020 to identify research that investigated AjD within an AF population (serving or veteran) following the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Eighty-three studies were included in the review. The AjD prevalence estimates in AF populations with a mental disorder was considerably higher for serving AF personnel (34.9%) compared to veterans (12.8%). Childhood adversities were identified as a risk factor for AjD. AjD was found to increase the risk of suicidal ideation, with one study reporting a risk ratio of 4.70 (95% Confidence Interval: 3.50-6.20). Talking therapies were the most common treatment for AjD, however none reported on treatment effectiveness.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
This review found that AjD was commonly reported across international AF. Despite heterogeneity in the results, the review identifies several literature gaps.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36330797
doi: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2140792
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

962-984

Auteurs

Amber McKenzie (A)

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Howard Burdett (H)

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Bethany Croak (B)

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Laura Rafferty (L)

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Neil Greenberg (N)

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Sharon A M Stevelink (SAM)

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH