Unrealized fertility among women in low and middle-income countries.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
23
09
2021
accepted:
11
10
2022
entrez:
4
11
2022
pubmed:
5
11
2022
medline:
9
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There has been little research on women who have fewer than their ideal number of children toward the end of their childbearing years in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examine the level and distribution of unrealized fertility in LMICs across three geographical regions. We also examine the role of sex preference and other factors associated with unrealized fertility. We used Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data for women age 44-48 in 36 countries from the three geographical regions of Western and Central Africa, Eastern and Southern Africa, and South and Southeast Asia. We conducted descriptive analysis to examine the distribution of unwanted fertility and unrealized fertility, and fit adjusted logistic regressions of unrealized fertility. The main variables are number of living children (including by sex) and the sex composition of children. Other variables included education, marital status, age at first childbirth, wealth quintile, place of residence, exposure to family planning messages, contraceptive use, and country. Unrealized fertility was highest in Western and Central Africa, followed by Eastern and Southern Africa. In all regions, there was a decrease in unrealized fertility with an increasing number of children. Findings for sex preference varied with little sex preference in the African regions, and some limited evidence of preference for sons in South and Southeast Asia. In most regions, higher levels of education, higher wealth quintile, and use of contraceptive methods were associated with decreased unrealized fertility. Family planning programs and messages should consider regional and socioeconomic differences in unrealized fertility in order to give women and families the right to achieve the family size they desire regardless of their status.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There has been little research on women who have fewer than their ideal number of children toward the end of their childbearing years in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examine the level and distribution of unrealized fertility in LMICs across three geographical regions. We also examine the role of sex preference and other factors associated with unrealized fertility.
DATA AND METHODS
We used Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data for women age 44-48 in 36 countries from the three geographical regions of Western and Central Africa, Eastern and Southern Africa, and South and Southeast Asia. We conducted descriptive analysis to examine the distribution of unwanted fertility and unrealized fertility, and fit adjusted logistic regressions of unrealized fertility. The main variables are number of living children (including by sex) and the sex composition of children. Other variables included education, marital status, age at first childbirth, wealth quintile, place of residence, exposure to family planning messages, contraceptive use, and country.
RESULTS
Unrealized fertility was highest in Western and Central Africa, followed by Eastern and Southern Africa. In all regions, there was a decrease in unrealized fertility with an increasing number of children. Findings for sex preference varied with little sex preference in the African regions, and some limited evidence of preference for sons in South and Southeast Asia. In most regions, higher levels of education, higher wealth quintile, and use of contraceptive methods were associated with decreased unrealized fertility.
CONCLUSION
Family planning programs and messages should consider regional and socioeconomic differences in unrealized fertility in order to give women and families the right to achieve the family size they desire regardless of their status.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36331909
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276595
pii: PONE-D-21-30775
pmc: PMC9635705
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0276595Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Assaf, Moonzwe Davis. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Jul;71(2):187-209
pubmed: 28440109
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):848-60
pubmed: 21652599
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Nov 07;3:19
pubmed: 29142757
Popul Stud (Camb). 2020 Nov;74(3):351-361
pubmed: 32633630
Demography. 2020 Dec;57(6):2047-2056
pubmed: 33001419
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219736
pubmed: 31318943
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 18;13(9):e0203344
pubmed: 30226852
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 1;12(1):374
pubmed: 31262350
J Pregnancy. 2019 Jan 30;2019:2920491
pubmed: 30834145
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):749-54
pubmed: 16522408
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0220970
pubmed: 31398240
Popul Dev Rev. 2013 Feb;38(Suppl 1):153-168
pubmed: 24812439
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Aug;23(8):1034-1049
pubmed: 32589103
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356
pubmed: 23271957