Isolation controls reestablishment mechanisms and post-drying community structure in an intermittent stream.
dispersal
disturbance
dormancy
invertebrates
resilience
resistance
stress
Journal
Ecology
ISSN: 1939-9170
Titre abrégé: Ecology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0043541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
accepted:
16
09
2022
pubmed:
7
11
2022
medline:
3
2
2023
entrez:
6
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Biota in disturbance-prone landscapes have evolved a variety of strategies to persist long term, either locally (resistance) or by regional recolonization (resilience). Habitat fragmentation and isolation can limit the availability of recolonization pathways, and thus the dynamics of post-disturbance community reestablishment. However, empirical studies on how isolation may control the mechanisms that enable community recovery remain scarce. Here, we studied a pristine intermittent stream (Chalone Creek, Pinnacles National Park, California) to understand how isolation (distance from a perennial pool) alters invertebrate community recolonization after drying. We monitored benthic invertebrate reestablishment during the rewetting phase along a ~2-km gradient of isolation, using mesh traps that selected for specific recolonization pathways (i.e., drift, flying, swimming/crawling, and vertical migration from the hyporheic). We collected daily emigration samples, surveyed the reestablished benthic community after 6 weeks, and compared assemblages across trap types and sites. We found that isolation mediated migration dynamics by delaying peak vertical migration from the hyporheic by ca. 1 day on average per 250 m of dry streambed. The relative importance of reestablishment mechanisms varied longitudinally-with more resistance strategists (up to 99.3% of encountered individuals) in the upstream reaches, and increased drift and aerial dispersers in the more fragmented habitats (up to 17.2% and 18%, respectively). Resistance strategists persisting in the hyporheic dominated overall (88.2% of individuals, ranging 52.9%-99.3% across sites), but notably most of these organisms subsequently outmigrated downstream (85.6% on average, ranging 52.1%-96% across sites). Thus, contrary to conventional wisdom, resistance strategists largely contributed to downstream resilience as well as to local community recovery. Finally, increased isolation was associated with a general decrease in benthic invertebrate diversity, and up to a 3-fold increase in the relative abundance of drought-resistant stoneflies. Our results advance the notion that understanding spatial context is key to predicting post-disturbance community dynamics. Considering the interaction between disturbance and fragmentation may help inform conservation in ecosystems that are subject to novel environmental regimes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36335551
doi: 10.1002/ecy.3911
pmc: PMC10078480
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['doi.org/10.6078/D1SM5H']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3911Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.
Références
Oecologia. 2020 Dec;194(4):709-722
pubmed: 33175251
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 23;111(38):13894-9
pubmed: 25136090
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 20;5:15455
pubmed: 26482293
Oecologia. 2013 Feb;171(2):545-56
pubmed: 22965268
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11512-9
pubmed: 18695234
Ecol Lett. 2020 Nov;23(11):1635-1642
pubmed: 32881372
Ecol Lett. 2014 Jun;17(6):756-67
pubmed: 24690406
Oecologia. 2004 Jul;140(2):352-60
pubmed: 15138880
Science. 2019 Sep 20;365(6459):
pubmed: 31604208
Ecology. 2022 Feb;103(2):e03586
pubmed: 34767277
Ecology. 2023 Feb;104(2):e3911
pubmed: 36335551
Sci Adv. 2015 Mar 20;1(2):e1500052
pubmed: 26601154
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Sep;27(17):4024-4039
pubmed: 34032337
Oecologia. 1980 Jan;46(2):272-282
pubmed: 28309684
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):740-7
pubmed: 22583795
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):94-100
pubmed: 16701235
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):318-28
pubmed: 18241235
Oecologia. 2017 May;184(1):171-182
pubmed: 28349200
Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1106-14
pubmed: 16972874
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jan;15(1):17-23
pubmed: 22017744
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1:S51-9
pubmed: 25576280
Ecology. 2017 Feb;98(2):565-575
pubmed: 27885655
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52604
pubmed: 23300719