Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Disease-modifying therapy
Multiple sclerosis therapie
Real-wolrd data
Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Siponimod
Sphingosine 1-phosphate
Journal
Neurological research and practice
ISSN: 2524-3489
Titre abrégé: Neurol Res Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101767802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Nov 2022
07 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
27
05
2022
accepted:
10
10
2022
entrez:
6
11
2022
pubmed:
7
11
2022
medline:
7
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing-remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions. Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy. Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing-remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36336685
doi: 10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3
pii: 10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3
pmc: PMC9639325
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
55Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Neurol. 2021 Apr;268(4):1210-1221
pubmed: 31363847
Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1263-1273
pubmed: 29576505
Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1526-1540
pubmed: 35261318
Mult Scler. 2022 Sep;28(10):1591-1605
pubmed: 35380078
Neurology. 2022 May 24;98(21):e2120-e2131
pubmed: 35379762
Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Apr;44(2):367-73
pubmed: 866038
Neurology. 2014 Jul 15;83(3):278-86
pubmed: 24871874
BMC Med. 2016 May 31;14:81
pubmed: 27246898
Front Immunol. 2019 Jan 10;9:3116
pubmed: 30687321
Neurology. 2008 Mar 25;70(13 Pt 2):1084-91
pubmed: 18184917
Lancet. 2016 Mar 12;387(10023):1075-1084
pubmed: 26827074
Lancet. 1991 Feb 23;337(8739):441-6
pubmed: 1671468
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Sep;21(9):1219-25, e71-2
pubmed: 24850580
Ann Neurol. 1990 Jun;27(6):591-605
pubmed: 2193613
Neurology. 2021 Jan 19;96(3):e376-e386
pubmed: 33328324
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):711-720
pubmed: 28206826
Lancet. 1988 Jul 23;2(8604):179-83
pubmed: 2899660
Neurology. 2021 Jan 5;96(1):e111-e120
pubmed: 33106389
Neurology. 2013 Apr 16;80(16):1509-17
pubmed: 23535489
Brain. 2016 Sep;139(Pt 9):2395-405
pubmed: 27401521
Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 10;8:577
pubmed: 29176956
Cells. 2020 Jul 24;9(8):
pubmed: 32722245