Quadrature transceive wireless coil: Design concept and application for bilateral breast MRI at 1.5 T.
Helmholtz coil
SNR enhancement
breast MRI
metasolenoid
quadrature coil
transmit efficiency
wireless coil
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
revised:
20
09
2022
received:
21
04
2022
accepted:
09
10
2022
pubmed:
7
11
2022
medline:
29
12
2022
entrez:
6
11
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Development of a novel quadrature inductively driven transceive wireless coil for breast MRI at 1.5 T. A quadrature wireless coil (HHMM-coil) design has been developed as a combination of two linearly polarized coils: a pair of 'metasolenoid' coils (MM-coil) and a pair of Helmholtz-type coils (HH-coil). The MM-coil consisted of an array of split-loop resonators. The HH-coil design included two electrically connected flat spirals. All the wireless coils were coupled to a whole-body birdcage coil. The HHMM-coil was studied and compared to the linear coils in terms of transmit and SAR efficiencies via numerical simulations. A prototype of HHMM-coil was built and tested on a 1.5 T scanner in a phantom and healthy volunteer. We also proposed an extended design of the HHMM-coil and compared its performance to a dedicated breast array. Numerical simulations of the HHMM-coil with a female voxel model have shown more than a 2.5-fold increase in transmit efficiency and a 1.7-fold enhancement of SAR efficiency compared to the linearly polarized coils. Phantom and in vivo imaging showed good agreement with the numerical simulations. Moreover, the HHMM-coil provided good image quality, visualizing all areas of interest similar to a multichannel breast array with a 32% reduction in signal-to-noise ratio. The proposed quadrature HHMM-coil allows the
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1251-1264Informations de copyright
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
Mansfield P, Morris PG. Advances in Magnetic Resonance: NMR Imaging in Biomedicine Suppt. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 1982.
Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L. Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology. 2019;292:520-536. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182947
Wasif N, Garreau J, Terando A, Kirsch D, Mund DF, Giuliano AE. MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Am Surgeon. 2009;75:970-975. doi:10.1177/000313480907501024
Saadatmand S, Geuzinge H, Rutgers E, et al. MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;06:20.
Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM, et al. Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. New Engl J Med. 2019;381:2091-2102. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1903986
Juanpere S, Perez E, Huc O, Motos N, Pont J, Pedraza S. Imaging of breast implants-A pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:653-670. doi:10.1007/s13244-011-0122-3
Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E. MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet. 2011;378:1804-1811. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673611613500
Wang L, Wang D, Chai W, Fei X, Luo R, Li X. MRI features of breast lymphoma: preliminary experience in seven cases. Diagnost Intervent Radiol. 2015;21:441-447. doi:10.5152/dir.2015.14534
Consul N, Amini B, Ibarra-Rovira JJ, et al. Li-Fraumeni syndrome and whole-body MRI screening: screening guidelines, imaging features, and impact on patient management. Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216:252-263. doi:10.2214/ajr.20.23008
Seo M, Cho N, Ahn HS, Moon HG. Cowden syndrome presenting as breast cancer: imaging and clinical features. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:586. doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.586
Lachlan KL, Lucassen AM, Bunyan D, Temple IK. Cowden syndrome and Bannayan Riley Ruvalcaba syndrome represent one condition with variable expression and age-related penetrance: results of a clinical study of PTEN mutation carriers. J Med Genet. 2007;44:579-585. doi:10.1136/jmg.2007.049981
Hendrick RE. High-quality breast MRI. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014;52:547-562. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033838913002339
Dietzel M, Wenkel E, Hammon M, et al. Does higher field strength translate into better diagnostic accuracy? A prospective comparison of breast MRI at 3 and 1.5 Tesla. Eur J Radiol. 2019;114:51-56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X19300865
Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Wendy DMB, Thursten B, Lehman CD. Clinical and technical considerations for high quality breast MRI at 3 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:778-790.
Vaughan JT, Griffiths JR, eds. RF Coils for MRI. eMagRes Books. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
Nnewihe AN, Grafendorfer T, Daniel BL, et al. Custom-fitted 16-channel bilateral breast coil for bidirectional parallel imaging. Magnet Reson Med. 2011;66:281-289. doi:10.1002/mrm.22771
Marshall H, Devine PM, Shanmugaratnam N, et al. Evaluation of multicoil breast arrays for parallel imaging. JMagnet Reson Imaging. 2010;31:328-338. doi:10.1002/jmri.22023
Del Bosque R, Cui J, Ogier S, et al. A 32-channel receive array coil for bilateral breast imaging and spectroscopy at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85:551-559.
Lee YH, Song KH, Yang J, et al. Fabrication and evaluation of bilateral Helmholtz radiofrequency coil for thermo-stable breast image with reduced artifacts. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23:e13483.
Smith MR, Zhai X, Kurpad KN, Harter RD, Fain SB. Excite and receive solenoid radiofrequency coil for MRI-guided breast interventions. Magnet Reson Med. 2011;65:1799-1804. doi:10.1002/mrm.22759
Cui J, Bosshard JC, Rispoli JV, et al. A switched-mode breast coil for 7 T MRI using forced-current excitation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:1777-1783.
Deshmane A, Gulani V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J Magnet Reson Imaging. 2012;36:55-72. doi:10.1002/jmri.23639
Wang Y. Description of parallel imaging in MRI using multiple coils. Magnet Reson Med. 2000;44:495-499. doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200009)44:3<495::aid-mrm23>3.0.co;2-s
Glockner JF, Hu HH, Stanley DW, Angelos L, King K. Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide. Radiographics. 2005;25:1279-1297.
Zivkovic I, Teeuwisse W, Slobozhanyuk A, Nenasheva E, Webb A. High permittivity ceramics improve the transmit field and receive efficiency of a commercial extremity coil at 1.5 Tesla. J Magnet Reson. 2019;299:59-65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780718303367
Wang A, Rupprecht S, Sica CT, et al. Initial evaluation utilizing ultra-high dielectric constant (uHDC) materials in breast imaging in 3T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2018;26:4310.
Rupprecht S, Sica CT, Chen W, Lanagan MT, Yang QX. Improvements of transmit efficiency and receive sensitivity with ultrahigh dielectric constant (uHDC) ceramics at 1.5 T and 3 T. Magnet Reson Med. 2018;79:2842-2851. doi:10.1002/mrm.26943
Shchelokova A, Ivanov V, Mikhailovskaya A, et al. Ceramic resonators for targeted clinical magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Nature Commun. 2020;11:3840. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17598-3
Ivanov V, Shchelokova A, Andreychenko A, Slobozhanyuk A. Coupled very-high permittivity dielectric resonators for clinical MRI. Appl Phys Lett. 2020;117:103701. doi:10.1063/5.0016086
Vorobyev V, Shchelokova A, Zivkovic I, et al. An artificial dielectric slab for ultra high-field MRI: proof of concept. J Magnet Reson. 2020;320:106835.
Vorobyev V, Shchelokova A, Efimtcev A, et al. Improving homogeneity in abdominal imaging at 3 T with light, flexible, and compact metasurface. Magnet Reson Med. 2022;87:496-508. doi:10.1002/mrm.28946
Mikhailovskaya AA, Shchelokova AV, Dobrykh DA, Sushkov IV, Slobozhanyuk AP, Webb A. A new quadrature annular resonator for 3 T MRI based on artificial-dielectrics. J Magnet Reson. 2018;291:47-52. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2018.04.010
Schmidt R, Slobozhanyuk A, Belov P, Webb A. Flexible and compact hybrid metasurfaces for enhanced ultra high field in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1-7. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01932-9
Shchelokova AV, van den Berg CAT, Dobrykh DA, Glybovski SB, Zubkov MA, Brui EA, et al. Volumetric wireless coil based on periodically coupled split-loop resonators for clinical wrist imaging. Magnet Reson Med 2018;80:1726-1737. 10.1002/mrm.27140
Puchnin V, Solomakha G, Nikulin A, Magill AW, Andreychenko A, Shchelokova A. Metamaterial inspired wireless coil for clinical breast imaging. J Magnet Reson. 2021;322:106877.
Schmidt R, Webb A. Metamaterial combining electric- and magnetic-dipole-based configurations for unique dual-band signal enhancement in ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2017;9:34618-34624. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b06949
Motovilova E, Sandeep S, Hashimoto M, Huang SY. Water-tunable highly sub-wavelength spiral resonator for magnetic field enhancement of MRI coils at 1.5 T. IEEE Access. 2019;7:90304-90315. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2927359
Glover GH, Hayes CE, Pelc NJ, et al. Comparison of linear and circular polarization for magnetic resonance imaging. J Magnet Reson. 1969;64:255-270. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002223648590349X
Hoult DI, Chen CN, Sank VJ. Quadrature detection in the laboratory frame. Magnet Reson Med. 1984;1:339-353. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910010305
Peshkovsky AS, Kennan RP, Fabry ME, Avdievich NI. Open half-volume quadrature transverse electromagnetic coil for high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Magnet Reson Med 2005;53:937-943. 10.1002/mrm.20422
Peshkovsky A, Kennan RP, Nagel RL, Avdievich NI. Sensitivity enhancement and compensation of RF penetration artifact with planar actively detunable quadrature surface coil. Magnet Reson Imaging. 2006;24:81-87. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2004.08.026
Tomanek B, Volotovskyy V, Tyson R, Yin D, Sharp J, Blasiak B. A quadrature volume RF coil for vertical B0 field open MRI systems. Concepts Magnet Reson B Magnet Reson Eng. 2016;46B:118-122. doi:10.1002/cmr.b.21327
Hurshkainen A, Dubois M, Nikulin A, Vilmen C, Bendahan D, Enoch S, et al. Radio frequency coil for dual-nuclei MR muscle energetics investigation based on two capacitively coupled periodic wire arrays. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 2020;19(:721-725. 10.1109/lawp.2019.2960610
Jylhä L, Maslovski S, Tretyakov S. High-order resonant modes of a metasolenoid. J Electromagnet Waves Appl. 2005;19:1327-1342. doi:10.1163/156939305775525891
Shchelokova AV, Dobrykh DA, Glybovski SB, Melchakova IV, Belov PA. A metasolenoid-like resonator for MRI applications. Proceedings of the 2017 11th International Congress on Engineered Materials Platforms for Novel Wave Phenomena (Metamaterials); 2017:1-3; IEEE. 10.1109/metamaterials.2017.8107846
Xu MB, Selamet A, Kim H. Dual Helmholtz resonator. Appl Acoust. 2010;71:822-829. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.04.007
Christ A, Kainz W, Hahn EG, et al. The virtual family-Development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2009;55:N23-N38. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/n01
Burfeindt MJ, Colgan TJ, Mays RO, et al. MRI-derived 3-D-printed breast phantom for microwave breast imaging validation. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2012;11:1610-1613.
Koreshin E, Zubkov M. Cylindrical resonators in penile magnetic resonance imaging: solenoids versus birdcage. AIP Conf Proc. 2020;2300:020063. doi:10.1063/5.0031744
de Miranda CM, Pichorim SF. Self-resonant frequencies of air-core single-layer solenoid coils calculated by a simple method. Electr Eng (Berl, Print). 2015;97:57-64.
Solomakha G, Hurshkainen A, Glybovski S, Andreychenko A. Volume metasolenoid-based coil for 23Na MRI at 7 Tesla. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1461:012056.
Jandaliyeva A, Puchnin V, Slobozhanyuk A, Shchelokova A. Control of the near magnetic field pattern uniformity inside metamaterial-inspired volumetric resonators. Photon Nanostruct-Fund Appl. 2022;48:100989.
Price ER. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy of the breast. Magnet Reson Imaging Clin North Am. 2013;21:571-581. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2013.03.002
Brui EA, Rapacchi S, Bendahan D, Andreychenko AE. Comparative analysis of SINC-shaped and SLR pulses performance for contiguous multi-slice fast spin-echo imaging using metamaterial-based MRI. Magnet Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2021;34:929-938. doi:10.1007/s10334-021-00937-w
Hu Q, Whitney HM, Giger ML. A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1-10. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67441-4
Jiang Y, Edwards AV, Newstead GM. Artificial intelligence applied to breast MRI for improved diagnosis. Radiology. 2021;298:38-46. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200292
Sheth D, Giger ML. Artificial intelligence in the interpretation of breast cancer on MRI. J Magnet Reson Imaging. 2019;51:1310-1324.