Drug-Coated Balloons: Drugs Beyond Paclitaxel?


Journal

Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)
ISSN: 2768-6698
Titre abrégé: Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101612996

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 10 2022
Historique:
received: 13 06 2022
revised: 06 09 2022
accepted: 15 09 2022
entrez: 7 11 2022
pubmed: 8 11 2022
medline: 9 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although controversially discussed, paclitaxel is the only clinically proven drug that inhibits restenosis when released from drug-coated balloons (DCBs). Limus drugs are currently being explored as alternatives. The aim of the preclinical studies was to investigate drug candidates beyond paclitaxel considered for balloon coating. Drugs were tested with respect to dissolution in organic solvents, coating on balloons, and drug transfer to the vessel wall. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation was tested in the porcine model of coronary in-stent stenosis. Intravascular drug treatment was achieved by DCBs at the time of stent implantation. Coating had to be adjusted for each drug. Doses on the balloons ranged from 1.0 to 8.6 μg/mm2 balloon surface. Satisfactory amounts of drug ranging from 5% to 29% of initial doses were transferred into the vessel wall. Angiographic parameters such as late lumen loss (LLL) at 4 weeks did not show reduction of in-stent neointimal proliferation by treatment with arsenic trioxide (0.87 ± 0.44 mm), betamethasone dipropionate (1.00 ± 0.54 mm), bortezomib (1.74 ± 0.46 mm), green tea extract (1.24 ± 0.51 mm), fantolon, an epothilone (0.86 ± 0.61 mm), methotrexate (1.09 ± 0.72 mm), and thalidomide (1.59 ± 0.55 mm) compared to treatment with uncoated balloons (1.07 ± 0.60 mm), while coatings with paclitaxel reliably reduced in-stent stenosis (LLL = 0.36 ± 0.25 mm). Despite the proven antiproliferative and/or anti-inflammatory effect of the drugs, none of the coatings significantly reduced LLL compared to uncoated balloons and thus, based on the results presented here, none of the tested coatings may be considered a substitute for the paclitaxel-based coatings currently in clinical use.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although controversially discussed, paclitaxel is the only clinically proven drug that inhibits restenosis when released from drug-coated balloons (DCBs). Limus drugs are currently being explored as alternatives. The aim of the preclinical studies was to investigate drug candidates beyond paclitaxel considered for balloon coating.
METHODS
Drugs were tested with respect to dissolution in organic solvents, coating on balloons, and drug transfer to the vessel wall. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation was tested in the porcine model of coronary in-stent stenosis. Intravascular drug treatment was achieved by DCBs at the time of stent implantation.
RESULTS
Coating had to be adjusted for each drug. Doses on the balloons ranged from 1.0 to 8.6 μg/mm2 balloon surface. Satisfactory amounts of drug ranging from 5% to 29% of initial doses were transferred into the vessel wall. Angiographic parameters such as late lumen loss (LLL) at 4 weeks did not show reduction of in-stent neointimal proliferation by treatment with arsenic trioxide (0.87 ± 0.44 mm), betamethasone dipropionate (1.00 ± 0.54 mm), bortezomib (1.74 ± 0.46 mm), green tea extract (1.24 ± 0.51 mm), fantolon, an epothilone (0.86 ± 0.61 mm), methotrexate (1.09 ± 0.72 mm), and thalidomide (1.59 ± 0.55 mm) compared to treatment with uncoated balloons (1.07 ± 0.60 mm), while coatings with paclitaxel reliably reduced in-stent stenosis (LLL = 0.36 ± 0.25 mm).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the proven antiproliferative and/or anti-inflammatory effect of the drugs, none of the coatings significantly reduced LLL compared to uncoated balloons and thus, based on the results presented here, none of the tested coatings may be considered a substitute for the paclitaxel-based coatings currently in clinical use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36336862
pii: S2768-6701(22)00642-6
doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2710283
doi:

Substances chimiques

Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D
Coated Materials, Biocompatible 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

283

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

US and BSche are shareholder of InnoRa GmbH. TH, SBie, ML, NB, DS, BK are employees of InnoRa.

Auteurs

Tobias Haase (T)

Experimental Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
InnoRa GmbH, 10115 Berlin, Germany.

Ulrich Speck (U)

Experimental Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Stephanie Bienek (S)

InnoRa GmbH, 10115 Berlin, Germany.

Melanie Löchel (M)

InnoRa GmbH, 10115 Berlin, Germany.

Nadia Brunacci (N)

InnoRa GmbH, 10115 Berlin, Germany.

Ole Gemeinhardt (O)

Experimental Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Denise Schütt (D)

InnoRa GmbH, 10115 Berlin, Germany.

Stephanie Bettink (S)

Clinical and Experimental Interventional Cardiology, University of Saarland, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Bettina Kelsch (B)

Experimental Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
InnoRa GmbH, 10115 Berlin, Germany.

Bruno Scheller (B)

Clinical and Experimental Interventional Cardiology, University of Saarland, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Beatrix Schnorr (B)

Experimental Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Articles similaires

1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH