Guillain-Barre Syndrome After COVID-19 Vaccination: A Secondary Analysis of Domestic Safety Data by the Japanese Government.
adverse reactions
covid-19
guillan-barre syndrome
japan
mrna vaccines
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
accepted:
31
10
2022
entrez:
7
11
2022
pubmed:
8
11
2022
medline:
8
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Purpose The purpose of this study was to figure out the risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, which has been reported as a rare adverse reaction. Methods Elucidating the characteristics, we performed a secondary analysis of the cases from February 2020 through January 2022, based on the publicly available spontaneous adverse reaction reports in Japan. Results We identified 115 cases, and all were after messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination. Of all the cases, 69 (60.0%) were female and 44 (38.2%) were older than 65 years old. Severe GBS was reported by 38 males (median age 61.5 years) and 51 females (median age 55 years). The median interval from vaccination to the onset of symptoms was eight days for males and four days for females. Sequelae were reported in 18 patients (7 males, median age 81 years; 11 females, median age 51 years), 11 of whom were older than 65 years old. The estimated incidence was about 0.0001% (0.000058% for the Pfizer vaccine and about 0.000046% for the Moderna vaccine, respectively). Conclusions Spontaneous reports would have various biases, the incidence of GBS after mRNA vaccination was as low as in other existing vaccination programs, and it is important not to interpret that risk expansively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36337786
doi: 10.7759/cureus.30905
pmc: PMC9620737
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e30905Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Kaneda et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.
Références
JAMA. 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1390-1399
pubmed: 34477808
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Feb;25(3):1663-1669
pubmed: 33629336
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul;67:102540
pubmed: 34249353
Neurology. 2010 May 25;74(21):1680-6
pubmed: 20427754
J Travel Med. 2021 Oct 11;28(7):
pubmed: 34128049
JAMA. 2021 Apr 20;325(15):1562-1565
pubmed: 33683290
Cureus. 2021 Feb 18;13(2):e13426
pubmed: 33758714
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228879
pubmed: 35471572
Vaccine. 2021 Jun 8;39(25):3313-3314
pubmed: 34020815
QJM. 2022 May 10;115(5):331-333
pubmed: 35426946
Drug Saf. 2009;32(4):309-23
pubmed: 19388722
J Neuroimmunol. 2021 Nov 15;360:577719
pubmed: 34560365
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2294-304
pubmed: 22694000
JAMA. 2022 Jan 25;327(4):319-320
pubmed: 34935863
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Jul 30;14(7):
pubmed: 34330729
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Sep;208:106887
pubmed: 34418708
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020 Oct;26(5):1184-1204
pubmed: 33002998
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Sep 20;11(5):597-600
pubmed: 34567447
Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar;43(3):1491-1493
pubmed: 34981285
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep-Oct;12(5):703-710
pubmed: 35173924
JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1101-1102
pubmed: 33576785