Daily fecal pH pattern and variation in lactating dairy cows.
Journal
JDS communications
ISSN: 2666-9102
Titre abrégé: JDS Commun
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918300983806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
10
08
2021
accepted:
05
01
2022
entrez:
7
11
2022
pubmed:
8
11
2022
medline:
8
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evidence supports a causal link between anomalous intestinal function and impaired performance in dairy cows. Consequently, digesta pH values obtained from colon, cecum, and rectum are increasingly used to monitor intestinal function in dairy cows. We conducted a study to describe the daily dynamics of fecal pH in lactating dairy cows. The study lasted 4 d and individual records of dry matter intake, milk yield, and fecal pH were taken. Samples of feces were taken every 4 h during the 4-d study, and sampling time was adjusted ahead by 1 h daily so that a sample was obtained for each 1-h interval of the day. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effect model including time as fixed effect and cow as a random factor. We performed a cosinor analysis using pH data at different time points to determine whether fecal pH followed a biorhythmic pattern. On average, cows consumed 19.1 ± 1.55 kg/d of dry matter and produced 26.3 ± 4.16 kg/d of milk. The most relevant results confirmed a biorhythmic pattern for feces pH around feeding time: mesor (midline estimating statistic of rhythm) 6.20, amplitude 0.28, and acrophase 5.66. Additionally, we found a positive relationship between dry matter intake and amplitude, possibly because of an increase in the amount of fermentable carbohydrate reaching the hindgut in response to increasing intake. When using fecal pH as an indicator of intestinal function, it is critical to obtain samples at several time points to capture its daily rhythmicity and to report sampling time relative to feeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36339732
doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2021-0158
pii: S2666-9102(22)00016-3
pmc: PMC9623698
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
106-109Informations de copyright
© 2022.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Jul;82(7):1545-54
pubmed: 10416170
Physiol Rev. 1990 Apr;70(2):567-90
pubmed: 2181501
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jan;95(1):294-303
pubmed: 22192209
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jan 25;7:2128
pubmed: 28179895
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Jun;87(6):1840-7
pubmed: 15453500
Dig Dis Sci. 1982 Jan;27(1):33-41
pubmed: 7067570
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992 Jul;27(7):545-52
pubmed: 1641581
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995 Aug;66(8):787-91
pubmed: 7487815
J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):1120-30
pubmed: 21415422
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0221266
pubmed: 31430322
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):1866-1882
pubmed: 30580938
Acta Vet Scand. 2015 Jul 17;57:39
pubmed: 26183694
Mucosal Immunol. 2017 Jan;10(1):18-26
pubmed: 27554295
Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Apr;17(4):219-232
pubmed: 28260787
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018 Feb 1;314(2):G247-G255
pubmed: 29146676
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5336-42
pubmed: 15345418
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97
pubmed: 1660498
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7764-76
pubmed: 25306274
J Anim Sci. 1977 Jan;44(1):131-5
pubmed: 13057
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 21;116(21):10333-10338
pubmed: 31064871
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Oct;99(10):8028-8040
pubmed: 27522430
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jun;102(6):5019-5030
pubmed: 30928269
Vet J. 2008 Apr;176(1):21-31
pubmed: 18329918
Science. 2019 Sep 27;365(6460):1428-1434
pubmed: 31604271