Multimodal parameter spaces of a complex multi-channel neuron model.
Bayesian framework
Hodgkin–Huxley
Markov chain Monte Carlo
computational neuroscience
model fitting
multimodal posterior
parameter estimation
Journal
Frontiers in systems neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5137
Titre abrégé: Front Syst Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477946
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
accepted:
28
09
2022
entrez:
7
11
2022
pubmed:
8
11
2022
medline:
8
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One of the most common types of models that helps us to understand neuron behavior is based on the Hodgkin-Huxley ion channel formulation (HH model). A major challenge with inferring parameters in HH models is non-uniqueness: many different sets of ion channel parameter values produce similar outputs for the same input stimulus. Such phenomena result in an objective function that exhibits multiple modes (i.e., multiple local minima). This non-uniqueness of local optimality poses challenges for parameter estimation with many algorithmic optimization techniques. HH models additionally have severe non-linearities resulting in further challenges for inferring parameters in an algorithmic fashion. To address these challenges with a tractable method in high-dimensional parameter spaces, we propose using a particular Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, which has the advantage of inferring parameters in a Bayesian framework. The Bayesian approach is designed to be suitable for multimodal solutions to inverse problems. We introduce and demonstrate the method using a three-channel HH model. We then focus on the inference of nine parameters in an eight-channel HH model, which we analyze in detail. We explore how the MCMC algorithm can uncover complex relationships between inferred parameters using five injected current levels. The MCMC method provides as a result a nine-dimensional posterior distribution, which we analyze visually with solution maps or landscapes of the possible parameter sets. The visualized solution maps show new complex structures of the multimodal posteriors, and they allow for selection of locally and globally optimal value sets, and they visually expose parameter sensitivities and regions of higher model robustness. We envision these solution maps as enabling experimentalists to improve the design of future experiments, increase scientific productivity and improve on model structure and ideation when the MCMC algorithm is applied to experimental data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36341477
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.999531
pmc: PMC9632740
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
999531Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Rudi, Velasco, Sinha, Idumah, Powers, Heckman and Chardon.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):2696
pubmed: 33514831
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2040-2054
pubmed: 19783207
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):563-74
pubmed: 16791145
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7;104(32):13187-91
pubmed: 17652510
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6455-60
pubmed: 25934918
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):356-62
pubmed: 16444270
Cell Rep. 2018 Aug 7;24(6):1536-1549
pubmed: 30089264
Biol Cybern. 2014 Aug;108(4):495-516
pubmed: 24962080
J Comput Neurosci. 1995 Sep;2(3):215-35
pubmed: 8521288
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;87(2):1129-31
pubmed: 11826077
Bioinformatics. 2018 Feb 15;34(4):705-707
pubmed: 29069312
J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500-44
pubmed: 12991237
Elife. 2021 Jul 29;10:
pubmed: 34323690
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;107(6):1681-93
pubmed: 22190622
Nature. 1989 Aug 31;340(6236):715-8
pubmed: 2475782
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1345-52
pubmed: 15558066
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2013;2013:251905
pubmed: 24348527
J Math Neurosci. 2020 Apr 6;10(1):5
pubmed: 32253526
Brain Sci. 2019 Dec 09;9(12):
pubmed: 31835351
Elife. 2019 Jan 31;8:
pubmed: 30702427
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Front Neuroinform. 2007 Nov 02;1:1
pubmed: 18974796
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(3):e1002401
pubmed: 22396632
J Physiol. 1979 Dec;297(0):267-87
pubmed: 231651
PLoS One. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0196435
pubmed: 29768444
Neuron. 1995 Dec;15(6):1427-39
pubmed: 8845165
J Neurosci. 2015 Apr 29;35(17):6752-69
pubmed: 25926453
Science. 2006 Aug 18;313(5789):976-9
pubmed: 16917065
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Mar 9;16(3):e1007669
pubmed: 32150537
Biol Cybern. 2011 Oct;105(3-4):217-37
pubmed: 21986979
J Neurosci. 1998 Apr 1;18(7):2309-20
pubmed: 9502792
Elife. 2020 Sep 17;9:
pubmed: 32940606
Neural Comput. 2011 Jan;23(1):46-96
pubmed: 20964539
BMC Syst Biol. 2017 Jun 24;11(1):63
pubmed: 28646868
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 May 30;15(5):e1006694
pubmed: 31145724
Neural Comput. 2020 Aug;32(8):1448-1498
pubmed: 32521212
Front Neurosci. 2007 Oct 15;1(1):7-18
pubmed: 18982116
PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Jul 21;2(7):e94
pubmed: 16848639
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Dec;90(6):3998-4015
pubmed: 12944532
J Neurosci. 2005 Apr 6;25(14):3509-20
pubmed: 15814781
Neural Comput. 2011 Oct;23(10):2599-625
pubmed: 21671785
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jun;109(12):2972-81
pubmed: 23536715
Biol Cybern. 2008 Nov;99(4-5):241-51
pubmed: 19011918
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;94(1):590-604
pubmed: 15728775