Total hip arthroplasty revision etiologies: a cross-sectional study in Isfahan, Iran.
Aseptic loosening
instability
periprosthetic fracture
revision
septic loosening
total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
ISSN: 1735-1995
Titre abrégé: J Res Med Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101235599
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
10
2021
revised:
20
04
2022
accepted:
10
05
2022
entrez:
10
11
2022
pubmed:
11
11
2022
medline:
11
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Complications after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are the most common reason for revision. Due to the high prevalence of revision surgery, we investigated the frequency of postprimary THA complications and related risk factor revision surgery. This is a cohort study that was performed in 2011-2019 on all patients who underwent primary THA surgery re-admitted to the Kashani and Saadi Hospital affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Science, Iran, due to some complications after THA. Demographic and basic data were collected from patient's medical documents. Harris hip score (HHS) was calculated for all patients 6 months after the last surgery. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21. Appropriate statistical tests were conducted to compare the results between the study groups. Among 1260 patients who underwent primary THA, 1006 of them entered the study after applying the exclusion criteria. Thirty nine patients were under revision, 53.8% had prosthesis infection, 56.4% had instability, 6% had aseptic loosening, and 30.8% had periprosthetic fracture. Odds ratio for the above complications were 45.5, 45, 6.4, and 15.5, respectively. HHS postoperatively was also significantly ( Instability, prosthetic infections, periprosthetic fractures, and aseptic loosening were the most common causes for increasing revision rates after THA, respectively. Higher BMI, persistent wound discharge, and nosocomial infections during the first hospitalization also increased the rate of revision after primary THA.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Complications after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are the most common reason for revision. Due to the high prevalence of revision surgery, we investigated the frequency of postprimary THA complications and related risk factor revision surgery.
Materials and Methods
UNASSIGNED
This is a cohort study that was performed in 2011-2019 on all patients who underwent primary THA surgery re-admitted to the Kashani and Saadi Hospital affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Science, Iran, due to some complications after THA. Demographic and basic data were collected from patient's medical documents. Harris hip score (HHS) was calculated for all patients 6 months after the last surgery. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21. Appropriate statistical tests were conducted to compare the results between the study groups.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Among 1260 patients who underwent primary THA, 1006 of them entered the study after applying the exclusion criteria. Thirty nine patients were under revision, 53.8% had prosthesis infection, 56.4% had instability, 6% had aseptic loosening, and 30.8% had periprosthetic fracture. Odds ratio for the above complications were 45.5, 45, 6.4, and 15.5, respectively. HHS postoperatively was also significantly (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Instability, prosthetic infections, periprosthetic fractures, and aseptic loosening were the most common causes for increasing revision rates after THA, respectively. Higher BMI, persistent wound discharge, and nosocomial infections during the first hospitalization also increased the rate of revision after primary THA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36353340
doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_959_21
pii: JRMS-27-70
pmc: PMC9639710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
70Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest
Références
J Trauma. 1974 Aug;14(8):675-94
pubmed: 4846429
J Int Med Res. 2018 Jun;46(6):2104-2119
pubmed: 29098919
Can J Anaesth. 2008 Mar;55(3):146-54
pubmed: 18310624
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2088-2092
pubmed: 28336249
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Sep;99(5):555-61
pubmed: 23891660
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jan;93(1):96-101
pubmed: 21196551
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Mar;85(2):187-90
pubmed: 12678350
Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):449-58
pubmed: 23083433
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jul 29;14(1):240
pubmed: 31358018
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jun;(327):238-46
pubmed: 8641069
J Formos Med Assoc. 1999 Mar;98(3):190-4
pubmed: 10365538
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1155-1161
pubmed: 30269967
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):379-84
pubmed: 27182244
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 May;78(5):749-54
pubmed: 8642032
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A Suppl 2(Pt 1):2-7
pubmed: 11685838
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Mar;94(3):391-7
pubmed: 22371549
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1285-8
pubmed: 24444568
J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(3):903-910
pubmed: 32333552
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2371-2378
pubmed: 33446383
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Feb;75(1):16-20
pubmed: 15022800
JAMA Surg. 2015 Oct;150(10):989
pubmed: 26287599
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1230
pubmed: 30718558