Survival outcomes in node-positive non-metastatic bladder cancer: An analysis of the national cancer database.

bladder cancer national cancer database radiation therapy radical cystectomy

Journal

Arab journal of urology
ISSN: 2090-598X
Titre abrégé: Arab J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101562480

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
entrez: 10 11 2022
pubmed: 11 11 2022
medline: 11 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinically node-positive non-metastatic bladder cancer (cN+) has been the target of several studies aiming to establish a standard of care for this population. Limited studies have shown a survival benefit for various multimodal therapy approaches. The role of radiation therapy has not been well established. Our study aims to study the trends of the reported treatment options offered to patients with cN+ bladder cancer in a national database and to evaluate the effect of various treatments, including radiation, on survival. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify cN+ bladder cancer patients who received chemotherapy alone or in combination with radical cystectomy (RC) or radiotherapy. 3,481 patients were included and divided into 4 groups: chemotherapy only, chemotherapy and RC, chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, RC, and radiation therapy. Demographic data was compared using ANOVA for continuous variables, and Chi-square for categorical variables. Multivariable analysis was done to compare groups using a multinomial logistic regression model. Kaplan-Meier test was used for survival analysis and Cox-Regression was used for multivariable survival analysis. Patients undergoing RC were significantly younger ( The combination of surgery and chemotherapy achieves statistically significant superior survival in cN+ bladder cancer. Adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy did not improve survival in this group of patients. (cN+): Clinically node-positive non-metastatic, (MIBC): Muscle invasive bladder cancer, (NCDB): National Cancer Database, (NAC): Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (RC): Radical Cystectomy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36353472
doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2077001
pii: 2077001
pmc: PMC9639493
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

175-181

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Références

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020 Feb;32(2):93-100
pubmed: 31400946
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2627-35
pubmed: 27269939
Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2225-2249
pubmed: 32162336
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Aug;17(4):e759-e767
pubmed: 31101578
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):639-644
pubmed: 29368231
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):859-66
pubmed: 12944571
Urol Oncol. 2016 Feb;34(2):59.e1-8
pubmed: 26421586
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):53-9
pubmed: 26205531

Auteurs

Amr A Elbakry (AA)

Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Tyler Trump (T)

Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Christopher Ferari (C)

Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Malcom D Mattes (MD)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Adam Luchey (A)

Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Classifications MeSH