Deformation of Gels with Spherical Auxetic Inclusions.
auxetic
continuum mechanics
deformation
model
simulation
Journal
Gels (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2310-2861
Titre abrégé: Gels
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101696925
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2022
29 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
29
09
2022
revised:
17
10
2022
accepted:
24
10
2022
entrez:
10
11
2022
pubmed:
11
11
2022
medline:
11
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Auxetic metamaterials possess unnatural properties, such as a negative Poisson's ratio, which offers interesting features when combined with traditional materials. This paper describes the deformation behavior of a gel consisting of spherical auxetic inclusions when embedded in a conventional matrix. The auxetic inclusions and conventional matrix were modeled as spherical objects with a controlled pore shape. The auxetic particle had a reentrant honeycomb, and the conventional phase contained honeycomb-shaped pores. The deformation behavior was simulated using various existing models based on continuum mechanics. For the continuum mechanics models-the simplest of which are the Mori-Tanaka theory and self-consistent field mechanics models-the auxetic particle was homogenized as a solid element with Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio and compared with the common composite gel filled with rigid spheres. The finite element analysis simulations using these models were performed for two cases: (1) a detailed model of one particle and its surroundings in which the structure included the design of both the reentrant and conventional honeycombs; and (2) a multiparticle face-centered cubic lattice where both the classic matrix and auxetic particle were homogenized. Our results suggest that auxetic inclusion-filled gels provide an unsurpassed balance of low density and enhanced stiffness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36354606
pii: gels8110698
doi: 10.3390/gels8110698
pmc: PMC9689618
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019 Jun 26;11(25):22768-22776
pubmed: 31140776
Adv Mater. 2018 Mar;30(12):e1706589
pubmed: 29380896
Gels. 2021 Dec 22;8(1):
pubmed: 35049541
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(21):18644-52
pubmed: 25286083
J Biomech Eng. 2012 Jan;134(1):011005
pubmed: 22482660
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018 Jun 13;10(23):19940-19947
pubmed: 29786416
Acta Mater. 2013 Feb 1;61(3):931-944
pubmed: 23929381
J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Mar;29(3):387-98
pubmed: 20194935
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Mar 19;12(3):
pubmed: 32204365
Gels. 2018 Apr 16;4(2):
pubmed: 30674811
Biomater Sci. 2020 Apr 21;8(8):2074-2083
pubmed: 32215398
Science. 2015 Sep 18;349(6254):1310-4
pubmed: 26383946
Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 18;6:6566
pubmed: 25782446
Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1780-2
pubmed: 16728597
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 29;21(1):
pubmed: 33383751
Biophys J. 2018 Nov 6;115(9):1630-1637
pubmed: 30297132
Mech Mater. 2012 Nov;54:70-83
pubmed: 23467780
Acta Biomater. 2012 Jul;8(7):2587-94
pubmed: 22465577