Assessment of Occlusal Vertical Dimension Change in Mechanical and Virtual Articulation: A Pilot Study.

facebow transfer occlusal vertical dimension virtual articulation

Journal

Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Nov 2022
Historique:
received: 12 10 2022
revised: 03 11 2022
accepted: 07 11 2022
entrez: 10 11 2022
pubmed: 11 11 2022
medline: 11 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the change in occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) with dental casts mounted on a mechanical articulator using an average axis facebow and on a virtual articulator mounted using the Bonwill triangle and the Balkwill angle and compare these groups with OVD change observed clinically in patients. Casts were obtained from each patient (n = 14) and mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator in the facebow preservation group (FPG) and on a virtual articulator using average anatomic values in the average mounting group (AMG). Customized mandibular anterior splints were virtually designed at an OVD increased by 3, 6, and 9 mm. Digital buccal scans were performed with the anterior devices in the participants’ mouths in the intraoral group (IOG), AMG, and FPG at the different OVD increases accordingly. While no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in the posterior interocclusal measurements with the incisal guide pin raised by 3 mm and 6 mm among all groups, a 9 mm increase resulted in a significant difference between AMG and IOG. The interocclusal posterior-to-anterior opening ratio observed clinically was 1:1.575. Increases in OVD up to 6 mm on dental casts mounted using average anatomic values performed similarly to the actual intraoral changes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36354657
pii: dj10110212
doi: 10.3390/dj10110212
pmc: PMC9689621
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010 Mar;18(1):17-22
pubmed: 20397498
J Prosthodont. 2021 Jan;30(1):24-35
pubmed: 32827222
J Prosthet Dent. 1979 Jun;41(6):605-13
pubmed: 374717
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):115-118
pubmed: 30885579
Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(2):166-181
pubmed: 31061997
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Aug;34(8):560-5
pubmed: 17650165
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:818694
pubmed: 24895613
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5S):e1-e105
pubmed: 28418832
J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Apr;53(4):495
pubmed: 3858510
J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Oct;52(4):467-74
pubmed: 6389829
Aust Dent J. 2012 Mar;57(1):2-10
pubmed: 22369551
Quintessence Int. 2012 May;43(5):369-80
pubmed: 22536588
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Apr 2;:
pubmed: 35382941
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1007-1014
pubmed: 29926254
J Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;28(4):436-443
pubmed: 30737975
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):271
pubmed: 33028288

Auteurs

Yu-Chun Lin (YC)

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Rebecca Scialabba (R)

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Jason D Lee (JD)

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Jie Sun (J)

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Sang J Lee (SJ)

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Classifications MeSH