Existing Policies/Guidelines on the Environmental Dimension of Antimicrobial Resistance in India: An Insight into the Key Facets through Review and SWOT Analysis.
SWOT analysis
antimicrobial resistance
environment
guidelines
legislations
policy
Journal
Tropical medicine and infectious disease
ISSN: 2414-6366
Titre abrégé: Trop Med Infect Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101709042
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2022
29 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
08
09
2022
revised:
11
10
2022
accepted:
17
10
2022
entrez:
10
11
2022
pubmed:
11
11
2022
medline:
11
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a multidimensional phenomenon. The environment acts as a mixing pot of drug-resistant bacteria from many sources such as pharmaceutical, biomedical, veterinary, and agricultural sectors. In this study, we analysed the existing AMR-related policies/guidelines/legislations in India in the above domains and how the current practices are being guided by them. We used a convergent parallel mix method design. Quantitative data were collected through a review of policies/guidelines/legislations in the said domains and analysed using the SWOT tool parallelly supported by key informant interviews of domain-specific stakeholders. Altogether, 19 existing AMR policies/guidelines/legislations were identified. The existence of few policies/guidelines in each domain indicated the evolving environment for policy interventions. However, the lack of capacity among farmers, inadequate provision for structured capacity building, high cost of alternatives to antimicrobials, and lack of provision of incentivisation in case of crop failure were identified as the major weaknesses prevalent across the domains. Opportunities for policy refinements/the introduction of new policies are ample. However, easy access to antimicrobials and injudicious use imposes threats to AMR containment in all sectors. Despite having a few policies for the containment of AMR, their implementation witnesses challenge due to the lack of collaborative approaches, the existence of policies disjointed from ground reality, infrastructural issues, and the lack of capacity and resources.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a multidimensional phenomenon. The environment acts as a mixing pot of drug-resistant bacteria from many sources such as pharmaceutical, biomedical, veterinary, and agricultural sectors. In this study, we analysed the existing AMR-related policies/guidelines/legislations in India in the above domains and how the current practices are being guided by them.
METHODS
METHODS
We used a convergent parallel mix method design. Quantitative data were collected through a review of policies/guidelines/legislations in the said domains and analysed using the SWOT tool parallelly supported by key informant interviews of domain-specific stakeholders.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Altogether, 19 existing AMR policies/guidelines/legislations were identified. The existence of few policies/guidelines in each domain indicated the evolving environment for policy interventions. However, the lack of capacity among farmers, inadequate provision for structured capacity building, high cost of alternatives to antimicrobials, and lack of provision of incentivisation in case of crop failure were identified as the major weaknesses prevalent across the domains. Opportunities for policy refinements/the introduction of new policies are ample. However, easy access to antimicrobials and injudicious use imposes threats to AMR containment in all sectors.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Despite having a few policies for the containment of AMR, their implementation witnesses challenge due to the lack of collaborative approaches, the existence of policies disjointed from ground reality, infrastructural issues, and the lack of capacity and resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36355880
pii: tropicalmed7110336
doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7110336
pmc: PMC9699572
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : United Nations Environment Programme
ID : No.1/SSFA/3879/Asia and Pacific Office/2021
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 05;17(3):
pubmed: 32033408
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018 Sep 1;94(9):
pubmed: 29878227
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Mar;153(3):299-310
pubmed: 33906992
Front Microbiol. 2014 Feb 05;5:23
pubmed: 24550896
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 10;115(15):E3463-E3470
pubmed: 29581252
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Oct 30;2014:135243
pubmed: 27350969
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jul 5;56(13):9149-9160
pubmed: 35732277
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Sep 5;10:27
pubmed: 28878929
Public Health Rep. 2012 Jan-Feb;127(1):4-22
pubmed: 22298919
Microb Pathog. 2015 Dec;89:54-61
pubmed: 26343496
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Feb;149(2):164-179
pubmed: 31219080
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):
pubmed: 33105585
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Dec 22;8:2193
pubmed: 29312422
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 8;9(1):103
pubmed: 32641109
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):
pubmed: 32967980
Springerplus. 2016 Oct 7;5(1):1743
pubmed: 27795886