Through the looking glass: Deep interpretable dynamic directed connectivity in resting fMRI.


Journal

NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 12 2022
Historique:
received: 28 09 2022
revised: 01 11 2022
accepted: 06 11 2022
pubmed: 11 11 2022
medline: 15 12 2022
entrez: 10 11 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Brain network interactions are commonly assessed via functional (network) connectivity, captured as an undirected matrix of Pearson correlation coefficients. Functional connectivity can represent static and dynamic relations, but often these are modeled using a fixed choice for the data window Alternatively, deep learning models may flexibly learn various representations from the same data based on the model architecture and the training task. However, the representations produced by deep learning models are often difficult to interpret and require additional posthoc methods, e.g., saliency maps. In this work, we integrate the strengths of deep learning and functional connectivity methods while also mitigating their weaknesses. With interpretability in mind, we present a deep learning architecture that exposes a directed graph layer that represents what the model has learned about relevant brain connectivity. A surprising benefit of this architectural interpretability is significantly improved accuracy in discriminating controls and patients with schizophrenia, autism, and dementia, as well as age and gender prediction from functional MRI data. We also resolve the window size selection problem for dynamic directed connectivity estimation as we estimate windowing functions from the data, capturing what is needed to estimate the graph at each time-point. We demonstrate efficacy of our method in comparison with multiple existing models that focus on classification accuracy, unlike our interpretability-focused architecture. Using the same data but training different models on their own discriminative tasks we are able to estimate task-specific directed connectivity matrices for each subject. Results show that the proposed approach is also more robust to confounding factors compared to standard dynamic functional connectivity models. The dynamic patterns captured by our model are naturally interpretable since they highlight the intervals in the signal that are most important for the prediction. The proposed approach reveals that differences in connectivity among sensorimotor networks relative to default-mode networks are an important indicator of dementia and gender. Dysconnectivity between networks, specially sensorimotor and visual, is linked with schizophrenic patients, however schizophrenic patients show increased intra-network default-mode connectivity compared to healthy controls. Sensorimotor connectivity was important for both dementia and schizophrenia prediction, but schizophrenia is more related to dysconnectivity between networks whereas, dementia bio-markers were mostly intra-network connectivity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36356823
pii: S1053-8119(22)00858-8
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119737
pmc: PMC9844250
mid: NIHMS1860176
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

119737

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R21 HL129047
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG043434
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG026276
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RF1 MH121885
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB009352
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U54 MH091657
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH087770
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH129047
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB006841
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG003991
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R03 MH096321
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000448
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : U24 RR021992
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors do not have any competing interests.

Références

Mach Learn Med Imaging. 2020 Oct;12436:1-10
pubmed: 36383497
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002 Spring;14(2):190-6
pubmed: 11983794
Future Med Chem. 2011 Apr;3(6):647-63
pubmed: 21554073
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar;24(3):663-76
pubmed: 23146964
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 03;5:1401
pubmed: 25520695
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jul;156(2-3):150-6
pubmed: 24794395
Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Nov 12;7:159
pubmed: 24282401
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 14;30(28):9477-87
pubmed: 20631176
Front Syst Neurosci. 2011 Feb 08;5:7
pubmed: 21369355
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Mar;38(3):1311-1332
pubmed: 27862625
Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;25(10):1347-57
pubmed: 17499467
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 15;190:191-204
pubmed: 29883735
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 21;30(2):824-835
pubmed: 31251328
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Jun 1;111(11):2374-91
pubmed: 24598530
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Apr;39(4):1626-1636
pubmed: 29315982
BJR Open. 2019 Jul 04;1(1):20190021
pubmed: 33178948
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):1666-81
pubmed: 18082428
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):1866-72
pubmed: 22936095
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jul 24;5:298-308
pubmed: 25161896
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;20(8):519-34
pubmed: 20471808
J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Feb;30(1):45-67
pubmed: 20706781
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Jan;11(1):70-98
pubmed: 25022540
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jul 1;64(1):40-7
pubmed: 18549875
Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Jun 05;14:45
pubmed: 32581756
Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Oct;13(5):1220-1235
pubmed: 30094555
Neuron. 2014 Oct 22;84(2):262-74
pubmed: 25374354
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jul 10;85(2):461-4
pubmed: 10991308
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(13):e6223
pubmed: 28353559
MAGMA. 2010 Dec;23(5-6):351-66
pubmed: 20162320
Front Syst Neurosci. 2011 Feb 04;5:2
pubmed: 21442040
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 07;8:897
pubmed: 25426048
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Aug 1;28(8):2959-2975
pubmed: 29771288
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):343-60
pubmed: 17553704
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:105-24
pubmed: 23668970
Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Dec;21(10):1251-61
pubmed: 14725933
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:62-79
pubmed: 23684880
Med Image Anal. 2018 Aug;48:117-130
pubmed: 29890408
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:1038-1049
pubmed: 27693612
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):823-8
pubmed: 24297904
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 30;14:630
pubmed: 32714130
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Aug 1;40(11):3203-3221
pubmed: 30950567
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jun;34(6):1330-43
pubmed: 22359372
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29:102531
pubmed: 33340977
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3293-7
pubmed: 25716830
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:736-745
pubmed: 27865923
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jan;42(1):80-94
pubmed: 32965740
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3085-93
pubmed: 22154957
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 24;30(47):15915-26
pubmed: 21106830
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2021 Jun;12729:71-82
pubmed: 34548772
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Sep 1;28(9):3095-3114
pubmed: 28981612
Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;19(6):659-67
pubmed: 23774715
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2015 Jun;2(2):46-55
pubmed: 26345525
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt B):619-631
pubmed: 28939432
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt B):1074-1079
pubmed: 26364863
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:101966
pubmed: 31401405
Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Dec;14(6):2232-2241
pubmed: 31376115
Brain Imaging Behav. 2022 Jun;16(3):1294-1302
pubmed: 34997915
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4724-9
pubmed: 10200329
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117385
pubmed: 32950691
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:431-442
pubmed: 29278772
Brain Connect. 2017 Feb;7(1):25-33
pubmed: 27917679
Brain Connect. 2011;1(1):13-36
pubmed: 22432952
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116366
pubmed: 31740342
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 15;193:175-84
pubmed: 26773910
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Sep;34(9):2154-77
pubmed: 22438275
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 1;85(1):60-69
pubmed: 30177256
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2020 Oct;12267:528-538
pubmed: 33257918
Arch Neurol. 1998 Mar;55(3):395-401
pubmed: 9520014
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Feb;38(2):631-643
pubmed: 27623046
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Dec;6(12):1125-1134
pubmed: 32800754
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 29;9(1):6580
pubmed: 31036843
Front Comput Neurosci. 2014 Oct 16;8:131
pubmed: 25360109
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8
pubmed: 12506194
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 15;95:232-47
pubmed: 24657355
Brain. 2018 Jan 1;141(1):37-47
pubmed: 29053771
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:449-68
pubmed: 24389422
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1043-52
pubmed: 20850549
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Apr;39(4):1765-1776
pubmed: 29322586
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Sep 25;12:220
pubmed: 30319370
Neurology. 2017 Oct 24;89(17):1764-1772
pubmed: 28954876

Auteurs

Usman Mahmood (U)

Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Department of Computer Science, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: umahmood1@gsu.edu.

Zening Fu (Z)

Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Department of Computer Science, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Satrajit Ghosh (S)

McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.

Vince Calhoun (V)

Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Department of Computer Science, Atlanta, GA, USA; Georgia Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Sergey Plis (S)

Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Department of Computer Science, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH