Study protocol of the BASINEL Study: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial investigating treatment versus no treatment of low-risk basal cell carcinomas in older persons.
adult dermatology
dermatological tumours
geriatric dermatology
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 11 2022
10 11 2022
Historique:
entrez:
10
11
2022
pubmed:
11
11
2022
medline:
15
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) represent 70% of all skin cancers. These tumours do not metastasise but are locally invasive if left untreated. There is a high incidence of BCC in the elderly, and clinicians frequently face important treatment dilemmas. The approach to BCC in the elderly should be investigated thoroughly. Data on health-related quality of life (HrQoL), survival and complication rate will be examined in a treatment and a non-treatment arm (1:1 allocation). In the non-treatment arm, in vivo biological behaviour of low-risk BCCs in elderly patients will be examined. The main objective is to combine tumour characteristics with demographic data, in order to determine whether treatment will positively affect the patients' HrQoL within a predetermined time frame. A monocentric randomised controlled trial (RCT) was designed at the Ghent University Hospital. The study population consists of patients with the minimum age of 75 years and a new diagnosis of (a) low-risk BCC(s). Patients in the treatment arm will receive standard care. Patients in the non-treatment arm will be closely monitored: the tumour will be intensively evaluated using multispectral dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and high-definition optical coherence tomography. All patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire concerning their HrQoL at consecutive time points. Patient-reported side effects will be evaluated via an additional questionnaire.Primary outcomes will include the difference in HrQoL and the difference in complication risks (treatment vs non-treatment) at different time points of the study. Secondary endpoints are the evolution of the BCCs in the non-treatment arm and the long-term survival in both study arms. Tertiary endpoint is the treatment effectiveness in the treatment arm. The sample size calculation was performed and resulted in a target sample size of 272 patients in this study with a 1:1 allocation. Subjects can withdraw from participating in this study at any time for any reason without any consequences. Approval for this study was received from the Ethics Committee of the Ghent University Hospital on 26 August 2021.The results of this RCT will be submitted for publication in one or more international, peer-reviewed medical journals, regardless of the nature of the study results. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05110924).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36356999
pii: bmjopen-2022-063526
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063526
pmc: PMC9660619
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05110924']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e063526Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Invest Dermatol. 2005 Feb;124(2):435-42
pubmed: 15675965
JAAD Case Rep. 2018 Nov 10;4(10):1014-1023
pubmed: 30456275
J Biomed Opt. 2018 Feb;23(2):1-10
pubmed: 29473350
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 10;173(11):1006-12
pubmed: 23699934
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Aug;30(8):1295-302
pubmed: 27230832
JAMA. 2014 Sep 10;312(10):997-8
pubmed: 25203077
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 13;8(9):
pubmed: 31540342
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:177-182
pubmed: 27713103
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Aug;187(2):244-245
pubmed: 35157305
Acta Derm Venereol. 2011 Jan;91(1):24-30
pubmed: 21264452
Skin Res Technol. 2020 Sep;26(5):708-712
pubmed: 32227367
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;153(1):71-78
pubmed: 27732698