Current Innovative Methods of Fetal pH Monitoring-A Brief Review.
cardiotocografic monitoring
electrochemical sensors
fetal and neonatal monitoring
fetal scalp pH sampling
materno-fetal
pH
spectral monitoring of oxygen saturation
ultrasound monitoring
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Nov 2022
03 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
16
09
2022
revised:
24
10
2022
accepted:
31
10
2022
entrez:
11
11
2022
pubmed:
12
11
2022
medline:
12
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we explore the "why?", and "how?", monitoring the pH of the fetal scalp is used, and show its limitations. In addition, we review the development of new devices based on the modern physics and nanomaterials serving this topic. Most of the works we found in our search have focused on improving the prognostic of fetal heart rate monitoring, because it is the "golden standard" in determining fetal distress. Although the best-known screening method, it can only provide limited information about the actual status of the fetus. The best predictive assessment, with the highest reproducibility, states that a normal fetal heart rate is indicative of a healthy baby. However, its excellent sensitivity is much reduced when identifying the actual "distress". This is when second-line monitoring methods come into play to guide the diagnostics and direct the obstetrician towards an action plan. Although a historic method, fetal scalp pH sampling is still under review as to its efficiency and place in the current obstetrics. Continuous surveillance of the fetal parameters is important, especially for the fetuses undergoing intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR). Since fetal scalp blood sampling is still under research and is a randomized controlled trial, which compares the relevance of pH and lactates to the obstetrical situation, the maternal-fetal medicine could greatly benefit from the introduction of engineered nanomedicines to the field.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36359522
pii: diagnostics12112675
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112675
pmc: PMC9689968
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Feb;54(1):79-83
pubmed: 24471849
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;178(2):330-5
pubmed: 9500495
Early Hum Dev. 1989 Nov;20(2):109-24
pubmed: 2686962
J Biol Eng. 2021 Dec 20;15(1):28
pubmed: 34930385
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct;51(8):102421
pubmed: 35690334
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 06;12(4):
pubmed: 35448277
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jul;226:54-58
pubmed: 29843068
BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1056-60; discussion 1060-2
pubmed: 24597746
BJOG. 2014 Dec;121(13):1749-50
pubmed: 25413765
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;67:44-52
pubmed: 32299728
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Dec;159(2):333-7
pubmed: 21978943
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Apr;216:106671
pubmed: 35144149
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD006066
pubmed: 28157275
J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Mar-Apr;38(2 Suppl):95S-99S
pubmed: 8483016
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jan;105(1):29-33
pubmed: 9442158
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1984 Feb;22(1):41-6
pubmed: 6144590
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 May;80(3):F246-9
pubmed: 10212094
JOGN Nurs. 1981 May-Jun;10(3):164-8
pubmed: 6908916
J Perinat Med. 2022 May 10;50(7):961-969
pubmed: 35534874
Clin Lab Med. 1981 Jun;1(2):215-25
pubmed: 7346212
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):265.e1-265.e8
pubmed: 35489441
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:1-6
pubmed: 35131629
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e71838
pubmed: 23977157
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Aug;263:153-158
pubmed: 34216939
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;177(5):1238-46
pubmed: 9396924
NCHS Data Brief. 2022 Jan;(429):1-8
pubmed: 35072603
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:139-143
pubmed: 33934025
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):615-624
pubmed: 29078943
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Dec 1;153(7):717-20
pubmed: 4073132
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jan;180(1 Pt 1):73-81
pubmed: 9914582
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2003 Dec;32(8 Pt 1):713-9
pubmed: 15067895
J Biomed Opt. 2016 Apr 30;21(4):40502
pubmed: 27071413
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:62-7
pubmed: 26253238
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jun 15;134(4):399-412
pubmed: 453276
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;199(1):34.e1-5
pubmed: 18342288
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr;50(4):101964
pubmed: 33130281
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 13;18(8):
pubmed: 30104478
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jan;184:97-102
pubmed: 25483990
Clin Perinatol. 1982 Jun;9(2):409-22
pubmed: 6749380
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;188(3):820-3
pubmed: 12634664
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jan 1;133(1):44-50
pubmed: 32772
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Mar;73(3):250-4
pubmed: 8122508