Bracing Interventions Can Help Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis with Surgical Indication: A Systematic Review.
brace
conservative treatment
idiopathic scoliosis
pediatrics
rehabilitation
surgery
systematic review
Journal
Children (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9067
Titre abrégé: Children (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648936
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Oct 2022
31 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
31
08
2022
revised:
18
10
2022
accepted:
25
10
2022
entrez:
11
11
2022
pubmed:
12
11
2022
medline:
12
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a common agreement that bracing is appropriate for curves between 20 and 40° for the Cobb angle during growth, but for larger curves, the experts' opinions are not consistent. We designed this systematic review to report the updated evidence about the effectiveness of bracing in scoliosis patients with curves ≥40° and a residual growth period. We included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, and case series addressing the effect of bracing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis during growth with curves ≥40° for the Cobb angle, published from 2000 onwards. Outcome: The percentage of patients with surgery, curves above 45° or 50°, and a Cobb angle change are all included in the study. Nine papers (563 patients, average worst curve of 44.8°) are included: four are retrospective case series, two are retrospective and two are prospective cohort studies, and one is a prospective controlled study. The overall quality was good, with respect to the type of design. A total of 32% of the patients improved, 26% were stable, and 42% worsened. The rate of improvement ranged from 11% to 78%; the rate of worsening ranged from 4% to 64%. There are some studies suggesting the use of bracing even in the case of severe curves when patients are motivated by trying to avoid surgery. More and better-quality research with coherent outcome criteria is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36360400
pii: children9111672
doi: 10.3390/children9111672
pmc: PMC9688311
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(4):311-9
pubmed: 26555827
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1512-21
pubmed: 24047455
Scoliosis. 2011 Aug 31;6:18
pubmed: 21880123
Neurospine. 2021 Sep;18(3):437-444
pubmed: 34634198
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e901-e906
pubmed: 30872192
Scoliosis. 2015 Mar 07;10:8
pubmed: 25780381
Eur Spine J. 2022 Apr 4;:
pubmed: 35376983
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 18;(6):CD006850
pubmed: 26086959
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Mar;30(2):85-89
pubmed: 28207617
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1951-6
pubmed: 24295798
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2068-75; discussion 2076-7
pubmed: 16166897
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(4):599-612
pubmed: 7380859
Eur Spine J. 2010 May;19(5):747-53
pubmed: 20195651
Spine Deform. 2020 Aug;8(4):597-604
pubmed: 32026441
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Apr;55(2):231-240
pubmed: 29517186
Spine Deform. 2015 Sep;3(5):440-450
pubmed: 27927530
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;97(5):346-356
pubmed: 29493563
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jul;39(Issue 6, Supplement 1 Suppl 1):S44-S46
pubmed: 31169647
Scoliosis. 2012 Sep 20;7(1):17
pubmed: 22995590
Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;38(4):469-75, v
pubmed: 17945126
Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018 Jan 10;13:3
pubmed: 29435499
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Oct;11(8):792-801
pubmed: 3810295
Eur Spine J. 2014 Dec;23(12):2603-18
pubmed: 24957258
Spine Deform. 2020 Oct;8(5):911-920
pubmed: 32394324
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Feb 24;52:19-23
pubmed: 32153775
Eur Spine J. 2022 Apr;31(4):980-989
pubmed: 35190896
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):834-41
pubmed: 23445094
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jul-Aug;(126):58-61
pubmed: 598140
Spine J. 2011 May;11(5):369-80
pubmed: 21292562