Comparative Analysis of Electric Field Strength, Magnetic Field Strength and Power Density around the Cell Phone Towers of Varying Characteristics with a Proposed Classification Facilitating Research on Human Population.

electric field electromagnetic field exposure evaluation magnetic field measurements public health radiation radiation detection radio waves

Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 10 2022
Historique:
received: 26 08 2022
revised: 20 10 2022
accepted: 26 10 2022
entrez: 11 11 2022
pubmed: 12 11 2022
medline: 15 11 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The continuous exposure of electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation from cell phone towers may possibly have an influence on public health. Each cell phone tower is unique in terms of number of antennas and its associated attributes; thus, the radiation exposure varies from one tower to another. Hence, a standardized method for quantifying the exposure is beneficial while studying the effects of radiation on the human population residing around the cell phone towers. A mere collection of data or human samples without understanding the cell phone tower differences may show study results such as an increase or decrease in biological parameters. Those changes may not be due to the effects of EMF radiation from cell phone towers but could be due to any other cause. Therefore, a comparative study was designed with the aim of quantifying and comparing the electric field strength (EF), magnetic field strength (MF) and power density (PD) on four sides of cell phone towers with varying numbers of antennas at 50 m and 100 m. Further, an attempt was made to develop a PD-based classification for facilitating research involving human biological samples. Through convenience sampling, sixteen cell phone towers were selected. With the use of coordinates, the geographic mapping of selected towers was performed to measure the distance between the towers. Based on the number of antennas, the cell phone towers were categorized into four groups which are described as group I with 1-5 antennas, group II comprising of 6-10 antennas, group III consisting of 11-15 antennas and group IV comprised of towers clustered with more than 15 antennas. The study parameters, namely the EF, MF and PD, were recorded on all four sides of the cell phone towers at 50 m and 100 m. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare the study parameters among study groups and different sides using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The mean MF in Group IV was 2221.288 ± 884.885 μA/m and 1616.913 ± 745.039 μA/m at 50 m and 100 m respectively. The mean PD in Group IV at 50 m was 0.129 ± 0.094 μW/cm

Identifiants

pubmed: 36361036
pii: ijerph192114157
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114157
pmc: PMC9653978
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Arch Dis Child. 2006 Apr;91(4):361-6
pubmed: 16551794
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 Jun;155(1):25-31
pubmed: 23179188
Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):307-13
pubmed: 16621850
J Radiol Prot. 2006 Jun;26(2):199-211
pubmed: 16738416
Radiat Res. 2008 May;169(5):561-74
pubmed: 18494173
Offentl Gesundheitswes. 1991 Aug-Sep;53(8-9):409-14
pubmed: 1837859
Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Oct;29(7):579-82
pubmed: 18412140
Oncol Lett. 2019 Nov;18(5):5383-5391
pubmed: 31612047
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;6(1):54-9
pubmed: 27011934
Br Med Bull. 2003;68:157-65
pubmed: 14757715
Biomed Environ Sci. 2010 Jun;23(3):199-207
pubmed: 20708499
Indian J Exp Biol. 2012 Dec;50(12):889-96
pubmed: 23986973
Am J Mens Health. 2019 Jan-Feb;13(1):1557988318816914
pubmed: 30526242
Electromagn Biol Med. 2017;36(3):295-305
pubmed: 28777669
Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S98-S106
pubmed: 15931683
Mutat Res. 1997 Dec 12;395(2-3):209-14
pubmed: 9465932
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):
pubmed: 34886365
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):
pubmed: 32610554

Auteurs

John Baliah (J)

Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Campus, Pondicherry 607402, India.

Balanehru Subramanian (B)

Central Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Campus, Pondicherry 607402, India.

David Livingstone (D)

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Campus, Pondicherry 607402, India.

Bushra Kanwal (B)

Independent Researcher, Banisar, Al Baha 65511, Saudi Arabia.

Mahmud Uz Zaman (MU)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdullaziz University, Ad Dilam Rd, Ar Rashidiyah, Al-Kharj 16245, Saudi Arabia.

Kumar Chandan Srivastava (KC)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.

Huda Abutayyem (H)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.

Khalid Al-Johani (K)

Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.

Anju P David (AP)

Al Jouf Specialist Dental Centre, Sakaka under Ministry of Health, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.

Deepti Shrivastava (D)

Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammad Khursheed Alam (MK)

Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.
Center for Transdisciplinary Research (CFTR), Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 602105, India.
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil lnternational University, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH