Survival and Chemosensitivity in Advanced High Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with and without a BRCA Germline Mutation: More Evidence for Shifting the Paradigm towards Complete Surgical Cytoreduction.
BRCA status
CA125
chemotherapy response score
complete cytoreduction
epithelial ovarian cancer
Journal
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
ISSN: 1648-9144
Titre abrégé: Medicina (Kaunas)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9425208
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Nov 2022
08 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
24
09
2022
revised:
03
11
2022
accepted:
04
11
2022
entrez:
11
11
2022
pubmed:
12
11
2022
medline:
15
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background and Objectives: Approximately 10−15% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cases are related to BRCA germline mutations. Better survival rates and increased chemosensitivity are reported in patients with a BRCA 1/2 germline mutation. However, the FIGO stage and histopathological entity may have been confounding factors. This study aimed to compare chemotherapy response and survival between patients with and without a BRCA 1/2 germline mutation in advanced HGSOC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Materials and Methods: A cohort of BRCA-tested advanced HGSOC patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery following NACT was analyzed for chemotherapy response and survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy served as a vehicle to assess chemotherapy response on biochemical (CA125), histopathological (CRS), biological (dissemination), and surgical (residual disease) levels. Univariate and multivariate analyses for chemotherapy response and survival were utilized. Results: Thirty-nine out of 168 patients had a BRCA ½ germline mutation. No differences in histopathological chemotherapy response between the patients with and without a BRCA ½ germline mutation were observed. Survival in the groups of patients was comparable Irrespective of the BRCA status, CRS 2 and 3 (HR 7.496, 95% CI 2.523−22.27, p < 0.001 & HR 4.069, 95% CI 1.388−11.93, p = 0.011), and complete surgical cytoreduction (p = 0.017) were independent parameters for a favored overall survival. Conclusions: HGSOC patients with or without BRCA ½ germline mutations, who had cytoreductive surgery, showed comparable chemotherapy responses and subsequent survival. Irrespective of BRCA status, advanced-stage HGSOC patients have a superior prognosis with complete surgical cytoreduction and good histopathological response to chemotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36363568
pii: medicina58111611
doi: 10.3390/medicina58111611
pmc: PMC9699274
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Oncogene. 2006 Sep 25;25(43):5864-74
pubmed: 16998501
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):943-53
pubmed: 20818904
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Sep;25(7):1201-7
pubmed: 26035124
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct;107(1):99-106
pubmed: 17602726
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):185
pubmed: 32131779
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep 9;:
pubmed: 36085390
Invest Radiol. 1981 Nov-Dec;16(6):479-86
pubmed: 7319753
Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1127-1132
pubmed: 21084428
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:787143
pubmed: 25136623
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jun;30(6):845-852
pubmed: 32341114
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 1;33(22):2457-63
pubmed: 26124480
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2391-2402
pubmed: 31562799
Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):249-57
pubmed: 26002111
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1657-1664
pubmed: 33028623
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jan 16;105(2):141-8
pubmed: 23257159
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):560-5
pubmed: 24333362
J Ovarian Res. 2016 Sep 15;9(1):57
pubmed: 27629537
JAMA. 2012 Jan 25;307(4):382-90
pubmed: 22274685
J Ovarian Res. 2021 Jan 4;14(1):2
pubmed: 33397458
Oncology. 2007;72(5-6):293-301
pubmed: 18198490
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):277-288
pubmed: 33357510
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Oct;98(2):219-23
pubmed: 11574135
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jun;22(6):1346-1352
pubmed: 21228333
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1493-1505
pubmed: 31521509
Oncologist. 2016 Jun;21(6):745-54
pubmed: 27009938
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;304(4):1021-1032
pubmed: 33661392
Mol Oncol. 2009 Apr;3(2):151-6
pubmed: 19383376
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Aug;126(2):224-8
pubmed: 22579790
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2484-96
pubmed: 22204725
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jun;105(3):712-5
pubmed: 17400284
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 17;10(24):
pubmed: 34945222
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Sep;122(3):521-6
pubmed: 21683993
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Sep 29;13(1):117
pubmed: 32993745
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Feb;148(2):275-280
pubmed: 29195926
Comput Biol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):575-86
pubmed: 21703607
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Feb;108(2):433-7
pubmed: 17997147
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jun;133(3):401-4
pubmed: 24878391
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001 Apr;27(3):239-43
pubmed: 11373099