Graph Theoretical Analysis of EEG Functional Connectivity Patterns and Fusion with Physiological Signals for Emotion Recognition.
EEG
emotion recognition
functional connectivity
graph theory
multimodal fusion
multimodal physiological signals
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Oct 2022
26 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
27
09
2022
revised:
22
10
2022
accepted:
24
10
2022
entrez:
11
11
2022
pubmed:
12
11
2022
medline:
15
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emotion recognition is a key attribute for realizing advances in human-computer interaction, especially when using non-intrusive physiological sensors, such as electroencephalograph (EEG) and electrocardiograph. Although functional connectivity of EEG has been utilized for emotion recognition, the graph theory analysis of EEG connectivity patterns has not been adequately explored. The exploitation of brain network characteristics could provide valuable information regarding emotions, while the combination of EEG and peripheral physiological signals can reveal correlation patterns of human internal state. In this work, a graph theoretical analysis of EEG functional connectivity patterns along with fusion between EEG and peripheral physiological signals for emotion recognition has been proposed. After extracting functional connectivity from EEG signals, both global and local graph theory features are extracted. Those features are concatenated with statistical features from peripheral physiological signals and fed to different classifiers and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for emotion recognition. The average accuracy on the DEAP dataset using CNN was 55.62% and 57.38% for subject-independent valence and arousal classification, respectively, and 83.94% and 83.87% for subject-dependent classification. Those scores went up to 75.44% and 78.77% for subject-independent classification and 88.27% and 90.84% for subject-dependent classification using a feature selection algorithm, exceeding the current state-of-the-art results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36365896
pii: s22218198
doi: 10.3390/s22218198
pmc: PMC9656224
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : European Commission
ID : 825079
Références
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Mar 22;19(6):
pubmed: 30909489
Brain Behav. 2019 May;9(5):e01269
pubmed: 30912271
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;57(7):1798-806
pubmed: 20442037
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;20(21):
pubmed: 33138049
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2021 Feb 01;PP:
pubmed: 33523816
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 25;22(1):
pubmed: 35009672
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2009 Dec;292(12):2023-31
pubmed: 19943355
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Apr 13;13(5):336-49
pubmed: 22498897
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:79-89
pubmed: 24440410
J Neural Eng. 2022 Jan 31;19(1):
pubmed: 35094982
Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
pubmed: 9623998
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jan 30;18(2):
pubmed: 29385749
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 18;19(20):
pubmed: 31635424
Netw Neurosci. 2021 Mar 01;5(1):274-294
pubmed: 33688615
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jan;18(1):58-67
pubmed: 11290940
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 13;19(9):
pubmed: 31086110
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
pubmed: 19819337
Front Neurorobot. 2019 Jun 12;13:37
pubmed: 31244638
Brain Inj. 2015;29(13-14):1729-35
pubmed: 26517188